Identification of parameters of structure of soil curvilinear massifs by numerical methods of complex analysis

Authors

  • A.Ya. Bomba National University of Water Management and Environmental Sciences, Ukraine
  • M.V. Boichura National University of Water Management and Environmental Sciences, Ukraine
  • O.R. Michuta National University of Water Management and Environmental Sciences, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24028/gj.v44i2.256402

Keywords:

electrical tomography, quasiconformal mappings, identification, inverse problems, numerical methods

Abstract

The works by specialists in electrical tomography usually model soil masses as a two-dimensional single-connected domain, the boundary of which consists of a horizon line and some «deep» line with a constant potential value on it. At the same time, the latter is set very approximately because of the «absence» of charges in remote (deep) areas. To avoid such simplification, the author proposes to solve the corresponding model problem in a relatively simple domain through its subsequent conformal mapping onto studied physical environment with a complex structure. The latter is carried out using some fractional-rational function. Whereas to simulate the movement of charges, numerical complex analysis methods are generally used. In this case, common simplification regarding the «point-like» nature of the applied quasipotential sections is rejected, and the distribution of current density on the last is taken into account. The studied medium, for example, is assumed to be given in the form of a function of local bursts of homogeneities.

Image reconstruction is conducted during alternate iterative solving of problems on the construction of a range of fields of current densities and refinement of parameters of conductivity coefficient. The latter is implemented out under the minimization of the functional of residuals between discrete (known) measurements of potential and stream functions on the surface of the soil mass and the corresponding calculated ones, using the ideas of regularization. Non-use of information (due to the high complexity of obtaining it) about the distribution of voltage and current in deep areas generates a certain mathematical uncertainty. However, its influence on the results of image reconstruction in the near-surface areas is insignificant.

Numerical experiments were performed and analyzed. For the given examples, the conductivity coefficient on the «lion’s share» of the medium was found with a small residual. Whereas the coordinates of the identified bursts, in comparison with a priori known ones, shifted towards the surface of soil mass. This is explained both by the peculiarities of the construction of the subproblem of identification of the conductivity coefficient in the absence of boundary conditions at deep sections and the existing significant quasiconformity residuals. In the future, these shortcomings can be «eliminated» by implementing an additional intermediate conformal mapping onto a circle and applying «fictitious orthogonalization» in the vicinity of the «junction» points of boundary streamlines and equipotential lines.

References

Bomba, A.Ya., Kashtan, S.S., Pryhornytskyi, D.O., & Yaroshchak, S.V. (2013). Complex Analysis Methods. Rivne: National University of Water and Environmental Engineering, 430 p. (in Ukrainian).

Bondar, K.M., Khomenko, R.V., Chernov, A.P., & Kuksa, N.V. (2020). Results of the ground penetrating radar survey in the church of St. Elias — Bohdan Khmelnytsky burial vault in Subotiv. Gieafizichieskii Zhurnal, 42(3), 175—194. https://doi.org/10.24028/gzh.0203-3100.v42i3.2020.204709 (in Russian).

Modin, I.N. (2015). Geophysical surveys for inclined-directional drilling for laying pipelines under roads. Inzheniernyie Izyskaniia, 5-6, 32—36. http://www.geomark.ru/journals_list/zhurnal-inzhenernye-izyskaniya-5-62015/?attach=2263 (in Russian).

Samarskii, A.A. (1983). The Theory of Difference Schemes. Moscow: Nauka, 616 p. (in Russian).

Aizebeokhai, A.P. (2010). 2D and 3D geoelectrical resistivity imaging: Theory and field design. Scientific Research and Essays, 5(23), 3592—3605. https://doi.org/10.5897/SRE.9000003.

ALGLIB-C++/C# numerical analysis library. September 10, 2021. Retrieved from https://www.alglib.net/docs.php.

Bomba, A., & Boichura, M. (2020). Identification of burst parameters using numerical quasiconformal mapping methods. International Journal of Applied Mathematics, 33(5), 903—917. http://dx.doi.org/10.12732/ijam.v33i5.11.

Bomba, A., Boichura, M., & Sydorchuk, B. (2020). Generalization of numerical quasiconformal mapping methods for geological problems. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5(4), 45—54. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2020.215045.

Bomba, A., & Malash, K. (2019). Modeling the formation of craters caused by the two charges explosion using quasiconformal mappings numerical methods. 2019 9th International Conference on Advanced Computer Information Technologies (ACIT), Czech Republic (pp. 113—116). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACITT.2019.8780021.

Bomba, A.Ya., Moroz, I.P., & Boichura, M.V. (2021). The optimization of the shape and size of the injection contacts of the integrated p-i-n-structures on the base of using the conformal mapping method. Radio Electronics, Computer Science, Control, 1(1), 14—28. https://doi.org/10.15588/1607-3274-2021-1-2.

Holder, D. (2005). Electrical Impedance Tomography. Methods, History and Applications. Bristol: Institute of Physics, 456 p.

Hua, P., Webster, J.G., & Tompkins, W.J. (1987). Effect of the measurement method on noise handling and image quality of EIT imaging. Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, USA, 2 (pp. 1429—1430).

Loke, M.H. (2021). Tutorial: 2-D and 3-D electrical imaging surveys. September 10, 2021. Retrieved from https://www.geotomosoft.com/coursenotes.zip.

Rasul, H., Zou, L., & Olofsson, B. (2018). Monitoring of moisture and salinity content in an operational road structure by electrical resistivity tomography. Near Surface Geophysics, 16, 423—444. https://doi.org/10.1002/nsg.12002.

Romashchenko, M.I., Bohaienko, V.O., Matiash, T.V., Kovalchuk, V.P., & Krucheniuk, A.V. (2021). Numerical simulation of irrigation scheduling using fractional Richards equation. Irrigation Science, 39(3), 385—396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-021-00725-3.

Ulyanchuk-Martyniuk, O., Michuta, O., & Ivanchuk, N. (2020). Biocolmation and the finite element modeling of its influence on changes in the head drop in a geobarrier. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4(10), 18—26. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2020.210044.

Vlasyuk, A., Zhukovskyy, V., Zhukovska, N., & Shatnyi, S. (2020). Parallel computing optimization of two-dimensional mathematical modeling of contaminant migration in catalytic porous media. 2020 10th International Conference on Advanced Computer Information Technologies (ACIT), Germany (pp. 23—28). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACIT49673.2020.9208878.

Published

2022-06-02

How to Cite

Bomba, A. ., Boichura, M. ., & Michuta, O. . (2022). Identification of parameters of structure of soil curvilinear massifs by numerical methods of complex analysis. Geofizicheskiy Zhurnal, 44(2), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.24028/gj.v44i2.256402

Issue

Section

Articles