The phenomenon of "person managing": formulation of research methodology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-0285.1.2014.146295Keywords:
problem of the person, Homo oeconomicus, Homo dominicus (the person managing), economy, economy philosophy, axiological approach, values, noosphereAbstract
To date, a man of his nature and essence, this is one of the most pressing problems of our time, as evidenced by the history of science and philosophical knowledge, in which there are many approaches in thinking about human existence. Based on this – and it's not in the least due to the expansion of the domestic field of philosophical studies – there is a very noticeable change in the traditional philosophical discourse for domestic issues. In this expanding flow problems should, in our opinion, and this section to include social and philosophical studies, philosophy as the economy in general and its specific aspects. We have in mind, especially the section of economic philosophy, which may conditionally, you can give the name of "economic anthropology".
From the perspective of the economy, the economy – the main area of human activity, the scope of its interaction with nature (biosphere), the creation and consumption of wealth as the existential values. It is in the economic activity comes becoming a man, his transformation from a biological organism in a social individual and personality. Human activity is not only changing the biosphere, it changes his mind, ideology and human society as a whole.
Subject of research originally formed as some ideal model that performs the function of the tool in the future and a means for understanding the variety of empirical reality. Moreover, this model is always mediated by goals and values not only researchers, but also expresses, according to the author of the concept of the "ideal type" of Max Weber, "interest period".
Main methodological approaches in the field of philosophical anthropology does not always correspond to modern social reality. Therefore, to overcome some of the methodological shortcomings, should carry out the analysis, in other words, "an epistemological revision" of approaches. Used axiological approach as epistemology installation. Tries to consider and enter the phenomenon of economic rights as an integral part of the philosophy of economy. Where farming is an integral part of the culture. Culture is the realization of goals (outcomes), focused, teleonoms human activities, the results of which is nothing but a collection of human values, axiological universals of culture (values and sense of reality). And, according to this reality every single individual, or "multi-dimensional man" somehow in the making, creates personal value system
The search for such elements typical for a person managing a manifestation of his axiological functions and will probably contribute to designing the ideal model of economic man. And so whether it's modeling "economic man" or "noosphere man" can not be a claim to receive objective knowledge, and perhaps only experience of existential-phenomenological understanding of the phenomenon of farms personality.
People involved in the business practices of all your system Ego, it sold its natural, emotional and spiritual strength. From the standpoint of economic philosophy strategic goal of all mankind at the present stage of development is – the noosphere.
The attempt in this study is some variation of constructing "ideal type" of man as an economic phenomenon of the noosphere, and perhaps as an option later in the human noosphere transition, based on the use of axiological approach, which will simulate a certain phenomenology and social characters as the basis of this typology.
Specific axiological aspect of the problem Homo dominicus as a phenomenon of noosphere, in our opinion, acquires when we oppose it Homo oeconomicus in the operation and development of economic systems, in other words, in the socio-economic reality. It will be two contrasting value systems. But before you jump to such a comparison, we had to first outline the methodological framework of the study, which was done, and only then determine the dominant value in one model or another person.
Adoption axiological approach as the current tendency in the study of man as an economic phenomenon noosphere should be regarded as establishing a new methodology, heuristically fruitful in relation to the identification of the inherent nature of man, and the description of its different models in phenomenology and praxeology. Oh man economy as a phenomenon should noosphere can lead philosophical discourse, highlighting various aspects of the manifestation of his "system of values", along with pragmatic, ethical, aesthetic, religious, and philosophical components that, in the end, can afford not only to analyze, reconstruct, but and predict human sociability in being.
References
Гребеньков Г.В. Введение в философию хозяйства / Г.В. Гребеньков. – Донецк : ДИЭХП, 2000. – 104 с.
Осипов Ю.М. Опыт философии хозяйства / Ю.М. Осипов. – М.: Изд-во МГУ, 1990. – 470 с.
Субетто А.И. Ноосферный вектор в философии хозяйства / А.И. Субетто // Общество. Среда. Развитие (Terra Humana). – 2008. – №4. – С.133-144.
Вернадский В.И Философские мысли натуралиста / В.И. Вернадский. – М.: Наука, 1988. – 340 c.
Лазарев Ф. В. Пролегомены к ноосферно-антропологическому манифесту / Ф.В. Лазарев // Ноосферология: наука, образование, практика [Под ред. О. А. Габриеляна]. – Симферополь: Феникс, 2008. – С. 54-82.
Муза Д.Е. Введение в глобалистику: Учебное пособие / Д.Е. Муза. – Донецк. Изд-во "Ноулидж" (донецкое отделение), 2010. – 240 с.
Лазарев Ф. В. Многомерный человек. Введение в интервальную антропологию / Ф.В. Лазарев, Б. Литтл. – Симферополь: СОНАТ, 2001. – 264 с.
Креминский А.И Новая антропология в свете учения о ноосфере / А.И. Креминский // Учёные записки ТНУ им. В.И. Вернадского. Серия: Философия. Социология. – Т. 22 (61). – 2009. – №1. – С.15-23.
Муза Д.Е. Антропологический поворот XXI века: контрапункт технологии и рынка / Д.Е. Муза // Ноосфера и цивилизация. – Донецк, ДонНТУ, 2011. – Выпуск 10-11 (12). – C. 175-183.
Гребеньков Г.В. Проблема человека в контексте философии права / Г.В. Гребеньков // Ноосфера и цивилизация. – Донецк: ДонНТУ, 2007. – Выпуск 5 (8). – С.116 – 122.
Гребеньков Г.В. Концепция ноосферы как мировоззренческая основа современной философии хозяйства / Г.В. Гребеньков // Ноосфера. Збірник наукових праць. – Донецьк: ДонНТУ. – 2002. – №1. – C.83-89.
Milton F. The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase its Profits. New York Times Magazine, September 13, 1970. – 376 p.
Greben'kov G.V. Vvedenie v filosofiyu khozyaystva/ G.V. Greben'kov. – Donetsk : DIEKhP, 2000 . – 104 s.
Osipov Yu.M. Opyt filosofii khozyaystva / Yu.M. Osipov. – M.: Izd-vo MGU, 1990. – 470 s.
Subetto A.I. Noosfernyy vektor v filosofii khozyaystva / A.I. Subetto // Obshchestvo. Sreda. Razvitie (Terra
Humana). – 2008. – №4. – S.133-144.
Vernadskiy V.I Filosofskie mysli naturalista / V.I. Vernadskiy. – M.: Nauka, 1988. – 340 c.
Lazarev F. V. Prolegomeny k noosferno-antropologicheskomu manifestu / F.V. Lazarev // Noosferologiya: nauka, obrazovanie, praktika [Pod red. O. A. Gabrielyana]. – Simferopol': Feniks, 2008. – S. 54-82.
Muza D.E. Vvedenie v globalistiku: Uchebnoe posobie / D.E. Muza. – Donetsk. Izd-vo "Noulidzh" (donetskoe otdelenie), 2010. – 240 s.
Lazarev F. V. Mnogomernyy chelovek. Vvedenie v interval'nuyu antropologiyu / F.V. Lazarev, B. Littl. – Simferopol': SONAT, 2001. – 264 s.
Kreminskiy A.I Novaya antropologiya v svete ucheniya o noosfere / A.I. Kreminskiy // Uchyenye zapiski TNU im. V.I. Vernadskogo. Seriya: Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. – T. 22 (61). – 2009. – №1. – S.15-23.
Muza D.E. Antropologicheskiy povorot XXI veka: kontrapunkt tekhnologii i rynka / D.E. Muza // Noosfera i tsivilizatsiya. – Donetsk, DonNTU, 2011. – Vypusk 10-11 (12). – C. 175-183.
Greben'kov G.V. Problema cheloveka v kontekste filosofii prava / G.V. Greben'kov // Noosfera I tsivilizatsiya. – Donetsk: DonNTU, 2007. – Vypusk 5 (8). – S.116 – 122.
Greben'kov G.V. Kontseptsiya noosfery kak mirovozzrencheskaya osnova sovremennoy filosofii khozyaystva / G.V. Greben'kov // Noosfera. Zbіrnik naukovikh prats'. – Donets'k: DonNTU. – 2002. – №1. – C.83-89.
Milton F. The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase its Profits. New York Times Magazine, September 13, 1970. – 376 p.
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Almanac "Culture and Contemporaneity"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
