GLOBALIZATION AS A FACTOR IN THE FORMATION OF MODERN CULTURAL SPACE UKRAINE

Authors

  • Valentin Klochko

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-0285.2.2015.146960

Keywords:

cultural space, globalization, cultural approaches to the study of space, the dialectics of contradiction and globalization in general and its impact on the nature and effects of changes in the cultural space

Abstract

The article defined cultural aspect of the concept of "cultural space" the basic approach to its analysis, found an association of modern requirements to the development of culture and spirituality in the age of globalization of all aspects of the life of man and society. Classification of approaches to determine the nature and characteristics of the complex concept of "cultural space", as well as the actual content of these approaches. In the light of the controversial nature of the effects of globalization in general are disclosed and contradictory effects on the development of the cultural process in Ukraine.

This article analyzes the impact of the modern world-historical process of globalization on cultural Plenty of countries and, in particular, of our country. First of all, the disclosed main approaches to the analysis of the subject of research. Suggest my own classification of these approaches revealed their very content. In the light of the controversial nature of the effects of globalization in general and the study of the contradictory effects of globalization on the development of cultural space.

Following the definition of the categories themselves "culture" and "cultural space" is given its own characteristic approach to the study of contemporary cultural space, the contents of the latter. Among these approaches should be defined:

- The dynamic approach, which considers the cultural space in the continuous changes of its constituent elements, causality, change in time and open space;

- A comprehensive approach taking into account the unity of material, social, technical, of the other elements of the cultural space;

- A statistical approach based on the use of mathematical methods and calculations for the characterization of the dynamics and changes in the cultural space;

- An integrated approach that traces the establishment of the relationship between the individual subsystems of cultural space, taking into account elements of subjects and levels of government;

- Functional approach, considering the cultural space through a set of functions inherent to its individual elements;

- The very essence of the dialectical approach globalization its impact on the cultural environment is seen as internally contradictory process that combines the positives and negatives, barbu old with the new;

In Satya we show how to counteract the globalization of the major trends in births lead to confrontation in the cultural space – between the desire for cultural integration with the world the danger of a gradual erosion of national cultures, national cultural identity.

The originality of contemporary processes of globalization and the cultural space of states and nationalities is manifested through the search for a compound of the principles and mechanisms of the relation of different parts of the global whole while strengthening dialectical contradictory parts – uniformity and peoples that do not lead to the disintegration of the whole, but rather strengthen and diversify the cultural play.

Disobeying cultural values of some of the other more developed countries, and mutual enrichment – that is generally manifested planetary spiritual synthesis. It has nothing to do with kulturnvm imperialism and its manifestations in the spiritual life (the preaching of the commercialization of "mass culture", "Westernization").

It is necessary to fight another negative feature of the impact of globalization on national cultural space – is the risk of a gradual erosion of national cultures under the guise of their mutual enrichment. An analysis of the accumulated Frantsiiets experience shows the usefulness borbv manifestations of popular culture "vesternizatszatsii" and the need for state and public control of these processes, connections and mutual influence of national and international cultural values.

This is especially important for Ukraine, which for centuries had their own state who could protect national achievements. Even inherited from the past existing suschestvennyn different political interests, culture and preferences of the population in different areas that can be observed and teretorialnomu (East – West), and language features (the ratio of the Ukrainian and Russian languages), hopes at one time or another vector integration in the future, which gives preference to one or the other part of the population, finally, especially education of different age groups of the population – all this should not be an obstacle gradual entry of Ukraine into the globalization space and the associated desire for cultural vzaimoobrascheniyu.

Already, this process occurs. It is reflected in the foreign policy of Ukraine to join the European political structure. Will etosodeystvovat national identity of Ukrainian society? In our view, globalization of its very objective logic allows you answer yes to this question. This is social optimism in assessing the impact of globalization on the nature of changes in the cultural space of Ukraine.

Thus revealed the nature and the characteristics of the cultural space and the direction of exposure to the processes of globalization, which was developed in the world, and analyzed the light of modern approaches suggest that Ukraine has no prospects of joining the global scope.

Author Biography

Valentin Klochko

Doctor of Science in Economics, Professor of the Art Management and Event-technologies chair, National Academy of Managerial Staff of Culture and Arts

References

Frey B. Revolution in Economics (Munich dectures in Economics) /B. Frey. Happiness A. – Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2010. – 256 p.

Fukuyama F. Trust: The Social Virtues and The Creation of Prosperyty/ F.Fukuyama . – N. : The Free Press,1995. – 480 p.

Ohmae, Triad Pover. The coming shape of globai Competion. – Free Press, 1985.

Wallersrein I. Klassenanalyse und Weeltsystemanalyse. In: Soziale Unmoglichkeiten- Soziale Welt. Sonderland 2. Gottingen. 1983.

Robertson R. Globalisation /Robertson R. – L., 1992.

Kiely R. Globalisation, post – Fordism and the contemporary context of development// Intern. Soziology . – 1998. – vol. 13,1, 95-115.

Reinicke W. H. Global public Foreign affairs /Reinicke W. H. – 1997. – vol. 76.

Друкер П. Бизнес и инновации. Пер. с англ. М.Д. Вильямс /Друкер П. 2007. – 432 с.

Білорус О. Г. Глобалізація і національна стратегія України / О. Г. Білорус. – Броди: Просвіта; К. : Батьківщина, 2001.

Соколенко С. К. Глобалізація і економіка України. К. КНЕУ, 2009.

Филипенко А. С. Экономическая глобализация: истоки и результат /Филипенко А. С. – М. : Экономика, 2010.

Клочко В. П. Глобалізація: економічні та соціально-культурні аспекти / Клочко В. П. – К., 2005.

Дилигенский Г. Г. Глобализация в человеческом измерении / Дилигенский Г. Г. // Материалы постоянно действующего междисциплинарного клуба ученых // Глобальный мир. – 2002. – Вып. 6 (18).

Frey, B., Happiness, A. (2010). Revolution in Economics (Munich dectures in Economics B. Frey. – Cambridge: The MIT Press [in English].

Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The Social Virtues and The Creation of Prosperity/ F.Fukuyama – N. – 4: The Free Press., [in English].

Ohmae, Triad Pover (1985). The coming shape of global competition.- Free Press. [in English].

Wallersrein, I. (1983). Klassenanalyse und Weeltsystemanalyse. In: Soziale Unmoglichkeiten- Soziale Welt. Sonderland 2. Gottingen. [in German].

Robertson, R. (1992). Globalisation. L. [in English].

Kiely, R. (1998). Globalisation, post – Fordism and the contemporary context of development. Intern. Soziology 13,1, 95-115 [in English].

Reinicke, W. (1997). Global public policy. Foreign affairs. vol. 76 [in English].

Druker, P. (2007). Biasness and innovations. M. Willanz [Trans.] [in Ukrainian].

Bilorus, O. (2001). Globalization and national strategy of Ukraine. O.G. Bilorus. Brody. Prosvita. K. Batkivshina [in Ukrainian].

Sokolenko, S. (2011). Globalization: economy of Ukraine. Kyiv, KNEU [in Ukrainian].

Filipenko, A. (2010). Economic globalization: origins and results. Moscow Economica [in Russian].

Klochko, V. (2005). Globalization of economics and social-cultural aspects. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Diligenski, G. (2002). Globalization in human mode. Proceedings of the permanent interdisciplinary club of the scientists. Globalnyi mir, 6 (18) [in Russian].

доктор экономических наук, професор, профессор кафедры арт-

менеджмента и ивент-технологий Национальной академии руководящих кадров культуры и искусств14. Kravchenko, A. (2001). Cultural studies. Moscow [in Russian].