The simulation of phonography as a temporal problem

Authors

  • Marianna Golubenko

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-0285.1.2018.148317

Keywords:

Media, temporality, phonography, sound engineering, simulacrum, phenomenology

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to substantiate the ontological status of phonography as a simulative activity and to identify relevant temporal markers. The methodology of the research is based on the application of cultural, comparative and historical-logical methods. Scientific novelty consists in the approval of phonography (even in its documentary form) as a simulative activity. In addition, the thesis is proposed: simulacrum, as an effect of "reversed temporality" (the copy is ahead of the original), is primarily a problem of hearing (as the most accurate time analyzer), and "poly-phonic" auditory perception is a direct way to provide a positive ontological status of simulated reality. Conclusions. The situation of "schizophony" (disconnection of the visual cause and auditory consequence) directly raised the question of the simulated "objective reality" of phonography. The temporality of phonography easily overturns the common eventuality (take at least cyclic reproduction, which in general came to the world for the first time with sound recording). The mentioned practice includes editing (as a nonlinear time fragmentation), so-called "doubletrack" – as a super-position of several timelines, and multi-microphone recording (like all-presence – the ability to observe simultaneously from different angles and plans).

Author Biography

Marianna Golubenko

Applicant, National Academy of Managerial Staff of Culture and Arts

References

Алдошина И. А., Приттс Р. Музыкальная акустика: учеб. для вузов. Санкт-Петербург: Композитор-Санкт-Петербург, 2006. 720 с.

Делёз Ж. Логика смысла / пер. с фр. Я. И. Свирского. Москва: Академический Проект, 2011. 472 с.

Кущ Є. В. Електромузичний інструментарій як еволюційний фактор музичної культури: монографія. Київ: НАКККіМ, 2015. 160 с.: іл.

Шлыков В. А. Звуковой образ в современных музыкальных фонограммах: дис. … канд. искусствоведения. Москва, 2010. 153 с.

Fox C. The art of noise: how music recording has changed over the decades. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/music/2014/may/16/music-recording-science-museum-christopher-fox.

Kester W. Understand SINAD, ENOB, SNR, THD, THD + N, and SFDR so You Don’t Get Lost in the Noise Floor. URL: http://www.analog.com/media/en/training-seminars/tutorials/MT-003.pdf.

Notes on Intercultural Communication. URL: https://laofutze.wordpress.com/2014/01/03/e-t-hall-proxemics-understanding-personal-space/.

Schafer M. The Soundscape: Our Sonic Environment and the Tuning of the World. Rochester, VT: Destiny Books, 1994. 320 p.

Aldoshina I., Pritts R. (2006). Musical Acoustics: Tutorial for Universities. Saint Petersburg: Kompozitor-Sankt-Peterburg [in Russian].

Deleuze G. (2011). The Logic of Sence. (Y. Svirsky, Trans). Moscow: Akademicheskiy Prospekt [in Russian].

Kushch E. (2015). Electronic Musical Instruments as an Evolutionary Factor of Musical Culture: monogra-phy. Kyiv: NAKKKiM [in Ukrainian].

Shlykov V. (2010). Sound Image in Modern Phonograms. Candidate’s thesis. Moscow [in Russian].

Fox C. (2014). The art of noise: how music recording has changed over the decades. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/music/2014/may/16/music-recording-science-museum-christopher-fox.

Kester W. (2009). Understand SINAD, ENOB, SNR, THD, THD + N, and SFDR so You Don’t Get Lost in the Noise Floor. Retrieved from http://www.analog.com/media/en/training-seminars/tutorials/MT-003.pdf.

Notes on Intercultural Communication. (2014). Retrieved from https://laofutze.wordpress.com/2014/01/03/ e-t-hall-proxemics-understanding-personal-space/.

Schafer M. (1994). The Soundscape: Our Sonic Environment and the Tuning of the World. Rochester, VT: Destiny Books.