The nature and functions of culture and art code in the contemporary scientific literature

Authors

  • Olena Aphonina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-0285.1.2016.148393

Keywords:

Code, the nature of the code, functions of the code, functions of the art code, nature of the art code

Abstract

Objective. The research deals with the definition of theoretical questions aimed at identifying the nature of the code and its functions in culture and arts from the point of view of the different concepts and paradigms in the modern scientific literature. The methodology of the study is to apply a systematic approach that focuses on the study of the nature and functions of the code of culture and arts. The scientific novelty of this work is to extend the concepts of the nature and functions of the cultural code. Based on the research of semantic and cultural content of the concept "code" the study gives its basic definitions, identifies its presence and comprehension in the scientific (philosophy, mathematics, computer science, semiotics, linguistics, cultural studies, literature, art, etc.) and non-scientific sphere (mythology, religion , fashion, artistic creativity, everyday life, socio-cultural activities of people). Conclusions. The problem of culture and art code belongs to interdisciplinary field of humanitarian and natural disciplines. The semiotic nature of the code has a long history and is associated with the process of encoding of information in various forms of spiritual culture and arts. Code is a formula, stamp, image, sign, symbol, which have constant quality, but can be transformed depending on the cultural and historical environment. The main types of cultural codes are the following: logical, semantic, stylistic, socio-cultural relations and mutual understanding. Any code is part of the communicative process, therefore, must be recognized and understood by all participants of communication. Its functions are in the communication – intersubjectivity, interactivity, perception and cognition.


Author Biography

Olena Aphonina

PhD in Arts, associate professor, doctoral student of National Academy of Managerial Staff of Culture and Arts

References

Андрейчук Н. І. Застосування терміну код в антропокультурній лінгвістиці / Н. І. Андрейчук // Вісник Нац. ун-ту "Львівська політехніка". Серія: Проблеми української термінології. – № 648, 2009. – С. 113-117.

Асафьев Б. В. Музыкальная форма как процесс / Б. В. Асафьев. Кн. 1, 2. – Л.: Музыка, 1971. – 376 с.

Кирилюк О. Життєзначущі орієнтації людини в світі та об’єктивні чинники формування культури / О. Кирилюк [Електронний варіант]. – Режим доступу: http://www.myslenedrevo.com.-ua/uk/Sci/Culturology/uvuk/ Universality/Progress.html.

Кирнарская Д. К. Психология специальных способностей. Музыкальные способности / Д. Кирнарская. – М.: Таланты – XXI век. 2004. – 496 с.

Колесник О. С. Феномен інтерпретації в художній культурі : монографія / Олена Сергіївна Колесник. – К.: НАКККіМ, 2014. – 265 с.

Культурология. XX век. Энциклопедия: В 2 томах / Ред. С. Левит. – СПб.: Университетская книга, 1998. – 447 с.

Лотман Ю. М. Статьи по семиотике культуры и искусства / Предисл. С. М. Даниэля, сост. Р. Г. Григорьева. – СПб.: Академический проект, 2002. – 543 с.

Постмодернизм. Энциклопедия / сост. А.А. Грицанов, М.А. Можейко. – Мн.: Интерпрессервис; Книжный Дом, 2001. – 1040 с. (Мир энциклопедий). Режим доступу: http://yanko.lib.ru/books/encycl/ post_mod_encyclop-_all.html#_Toc1654-6803.

Соссюр Ф. де. Курс общей лингвистики / Ф. де Соссюр; [пер. с фр. А. М. Сухотин] // Ф. де Соссюр. Труды по языкознанию. – М., 1977. – С. 31-285.

Шеннон К. Математическая теория связи // Работы по теории информации и кибернетике / Клод Шеннон. – М. : Иностранная литература, 1963. – С. 223-332.

Paivio A. Imagery and verbal processes / А. Paivio. – New York, 1981. – 608 р. – Режим доступу : http://www.lifecircles-inc.com/Learningtheories/IP/paivio.html.

Andreychuk N. (2009). Use of the term code in antropokulturnogo linguistics. Journal of Nat. Zap "Lviv Polytechnic". Series: Problems of Ukrainian terminology [in Ukrainian].

Asafiev B.V. (1971). Musical form as a process. L .: Music, 1971 [in Russian].

Kyryliuk O. (1996). Zhyttieznachushchi oriientatsii liudyny v sviti ta obiektyvni chynnyky formuvannia kultury. Access: http://www.-myslenedrevo.com.ua/uk/Sc-i/Culturology/uvuk [in Russian].

Kirnarskaya D. (2004). Psychology special abilities. Musical ability. M .: Talents – XXI century [in Russian].

Kolesnik О. (2014). The phenomenon of the interpretation in the artistic culture: monograph. К: NAKKKiM [in Ukrainian].

Cultural. XX century. Encyclopedia: In 2 volumes / Ed. S. Levit. (1998). St. Petersburg: University Book [in Russian].

Lotman Iu. (2002). Stat'i po semiotike kul'tury i iskusstva. SPb.: Akademicheskii proekt [in Russian].

Postmodernism: Encyclopedia. (2001). Gritsanov, A., Mozheyko, M.A. (Eds.).Minsk Interpresservis: Bk. House [in Belarus].

F. de Saussure. (1977). Course in General Linguistics Trans. with fr. AM Sukhotin. Works on linguistics. Moscow [in Russian].

Shennon K. (1963). Matematicheskaia teoriia sviazi // Raboty po teorii informatsii i kibernetike. M. : Inostrannaia literatura [in Russian].

Paivio A. (1981). Imagery and verbal processes. New York. Access : http://www.l-ifecircles- inc.com/Learningtheories/IP/paivio.html [in English].