Features of the managerial culture of late industrialism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-0285.1.2019.179636Keywords:
management culture, late industrialism societyAbstract
The purpose of the article is a theoretical and methodological analysis of the formation of the managerial cul- ture of late industrialism. The methodology of research is the dialectical principle of cognition, sociocultural and his- torical approaches of the systems, fundamental positions of theory and history of management culture. The scientific and interdisciplinary methods of research are used: analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, comparison, for- malization. The scientific novelty of the obtained results is the generalization of theoretical propositions regarding the emergence, formation, and development of a culture of management of late industrialism, identify the specific features and regularities of these processes. Conclusions. The formation of managerial culture of late industrialism, based on quantitative, system and situational approaches, refers to the period of the glorious 30th anniversary in the history of capitalism and socialism, that is, until the post-war period of 1945-1975, although the origin of the elements of the theo- ry of this management took place much earlier. The objective prerequisites for the relevance of both approaches, in this period, began a rapid development of scientific and technological progress, complications of device and environment associations and the failure of the then management science to make effective recommendations for their functioning. The beginning of the spread quantitative approach should be considered the 50-ies In this approach, management is viewed as a logical process, which lends itself to mathematical formalization. Its precondition was the invention of elec- tronic computers, mathematical methods of operations research, modeling and forecasting. This allowed to quickly pro- cess large amounts of information to create a management model with a large number of variables, conditions, and restrictions and to find optimal management solutions. The increasing interdependence has led to a proliferation in the 60-ies of the system approach, from the point of view of which any organization viewed as open, dynamic system, and as a multidimensional phenomenon, designed to ensure the integrity and viability of the system-organization in a chang- ing external environment. In the 70-ies. in the conditions of growing uncertainty, received widespread situational ap- proach, the essence of which is to identify situations and identifying and implementing adequate management actions that allow you to provide a winning position for the organization.
References
Богданов А. А. Тектология (всеобщая организационная наука). Москва : Директ-Медиа, 2014. Кн.
Гвишиани Д. М. Организация и управление. Москва : МГТУ, 1998. 536 с.
Государственное управление. Словарь-справочник (по материалам «International Encyclopedia of Public Policy and Administration»). Пер. с англ. Под ред. Л. Т. Волчковой. Санкт-Петербург : Петрополис, 2001. 632 с.
Дмитриев В. К. Экономические очерки. Москва : ГУ ВШЭ, 2001. 580 с.
Друкер П. Управление в обществе будущего. Пер. с англ. Москва : Вильямс, 2007. 320 с.
Канторович Л. В. Математические методы организации и планирования производства. Ленинград : ЛГУ, 1939. 67 с.
Лао-цзы. Дао дэ цзин. Пер. с древнекит. Москва : Центрполиграф, 2016. 224 с.
Мак‘явеллі Н. Державець. Флорентійські хроніки. Державець. Пер. з італ. Харків : Фоліо, 2007. С. 415–487.
Мартинишин Я. М., Коваленко Є. Я. Мистецтво управління й освітні технології підготовки мене- джерів соціокультурної діяльності. Біла Церква : Видавець Пшонківський О. В., 2018. 374 с.
Мартинишин Я. М., Коваленко Є. Я. Смисли в культурі управління. Вісник Національної академії керівних кадрів культури і мистецтв. 2017. ғ 4. С. 26–31.
Мартинишин Я. М., Коваленко Є. Я. Формування сучасної системи управління життєдіяльністю суспільства. Вісник Київського національного університету культури і мистецтв. Серія: Менеджмент соціокультурної діяльності. 2018. Вип. 1. С. 7–24.
Мартинишин Я. М., Хлистун О. С. Феномен ідей в управлінні життєдіяльністю суспільства. Вісник Київського національного університету культури і мистецтв. Серія: Менеджмент соціокультурної діяльності. 2018. Вип. 2. С. 7–25.
Немчинов В. С. Экономико-математические методы и модели. Москва : Соцэкгиз, 1962. 410 с.
Слуцкий Е. Е. Экономические и статистические произведения. Москва : Эксмо, 2011. 1152 с.
Bertalanffy L. General System Theory. New York: George Braziller, 1969. 296 р.
Follett M. P. Dynamic Administration: The Collected Papers of Mary Parker Follett. Eastford: Martino Fine Books, 2014. 322 р.
Hamel G. The Future of Management. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2007. 255 р.
Mockler R. J. Situational Theory of Management Situational Theory of Management. Harvard Business Review. 1971. ғ 3. Р. 146.
Pink D. A whole new mind why right-brainers will rule the future. New York: Riverhead Books, 2015. 329 p 268 s.
Smuts J. Holism and Evolution. London: MacMillan Press, 1927. 392 p.
Trentowski B. Stosunek filozofii do cybernetyki czyli sztuki rządzenia narodem. Poznań : Żupański, 1843.
Bogdanov, A. A. (2014). Tectology (universal organizational science). (Vol. 1). Moscow: Direkt-Media [in Russian].
Gvishiani, D. M. (1998). Organization and management. Moscow: MGTU [in Russian].
Volchkovа, L. T. (2001). Administration of the state. Dictionary (based on "International Encyclopedia of Public Policy and Administration"). (Trans. in Eng.). St. Petersburg: Petropolis [in Russian].
Dmitriev, V. K. (2001). Economic essays. Moscow: GU VShE [in Russian].
Druker, P. (2007). Managing in the society of the future. (Trans. in Eng.). Moscow: Vil'iams [in Russian].
Kantorovich, L. V. (1939). Mathematical methods of organizing and planning production. Leningrad: LGU [in Russian].
Lao-tszy. (2016). Dao de tszin. (Trans. in ancient China.). Moscow: Tsentrpoligraf [in Russian].
Mak'iavelli, N. (2007). The Prince. Florentijs'ki khroniky. Derzhavets' (Trans. in Ital.). Kharkiv: Folio, 415-487 [in Ukrainian].
Martynyshyn, Y. M., & Kovalenko, Y. Y. (2018). Art of management and educational technologies of preparation of managers of social and cultural activity. Bila Tserkva: Vydavets O. V. Pshonkivskyj [in Ukrainian].
Martynyshyn, Y. M., & Kovalenko, Y. Y. (2017). The measures in culture of management. Visnyk Natsional'noi akademii kerivnykh kadriv kul'tury i mystetstv, 4, 26-31 [in Ukrainian].
Martynyshyn, Y. M., & Kovalenko, Y. Y. (2018). Formation of the modern system management of life society. Visnyk Kyivs'koho natsional'noho universytetu kul'tury i mystetstv. Seriia: Menedzhment sotsiokul'turnoi di- ial'nosti, 1, 7-24 [in Ukrainian].
Martynyshyn, Y. M., & Khlystun, Е. S. (2018). The phenomenon of ideas in the management activity of the society. Visnyk Kyivs'koho natsional'noho universytetu kul'tury i mystetstv. Seriia: Menedzhment sotsiokul'turnoi diial'nosti, 2, 7-25 [in Ukrainian].
Nemchinov, V. S. (1962). Economic-mathematical methods and models. Moscow: Sotsekgiz [in Russian].
Slutskii, E. E. (2011). Economic and statistical works. Moscow: Eksmo [in Russian].
Bertalanffy, L. (1969). General System Theory. New York: George Braziller.
Follett, M. P. (2014). Dynamic Administration: The Collected Papers of Mary Parker Follett. Eastford: Martino Fine Books.
Hamel, G. (2007). The Future of Management. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Mockler, R. J. (1971). Situational Theory of Management Situational Theory of Management. Harvard Business Review, 3, 146.
Pink, D. (2015). A whole new mind why right brainers will rule the future. New York: Riverhead Books.
Smuts, J. (1927). Holism and Evolution. London: MacMillan Press.
Trentowski, B. (1843). The Relationship of philosophy to Cybernetics it is the art to lead the people. Poznań: Żupański [in Poland].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).