The semiotic dominants of initiation physicality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-0285.1.2020.221329Keywords:
initiation, human, initiation physicality, sign, symbol, hair, hairstyle, mask.Abstract
The purpose of the article is to investigate the semiotic dominants of physicality in initiation practices, conditioned by both external and internal representations of human beings. The methodology is based on the use of psychoanalytic, structural-semiotic, philosophical-anthropological, and cultural-historical methods. Scientific novelty. The application of the structural-semiotic approach allows us to reconstruct the symbolic system of physicality as a text having an internal structure and to suggest ways of deciphering this text. The semiotic dominants of initiation physicality on the example of hair, hairstyle, mask, and various manipulations with the body are considered, characteristics of their filling are given. Conclusions. Examples of the semiotic dominants of initiation physicality prove that initiation is represented through the prism of a semiotic process in which physicality is a sign and the context and conditions of its expression are initiations. This theory of sign systems provides an opportunity to interpret the human experience as an interpretive structure in which the way a person uses a sign or acts through initiation practices determines the approach to a perfect image. Models of modern man's behavior are based primarily on the attainment of bodily perfection with the help of hairstyle, makeup, tattooing, piercing, aesthetic methods of surgery, etc. This process is an unconscious means of copying the actions of an archaic person who has used tattoos, scarring, and other manipulations of the body in rituals and rituals of initiation. A promising direction for further research is the detailed study of initiation physicality in contemporary cultural space as an appropriate model of positioning the individual in a society, which proclaims the requirements for manipulation and transformation in order to conform to the image of the body formed by that society.References
Vojevodin, O. P. (2013). Man. Society. Culture. Culture of Ukraine, 43, 81–88 [in Ukrainian].
Gaznyuk, L. M. (2016). Personal, generic, and universal in the somatic being of man. Scientific Sheets, № 24 (245), 28, 149–152 [in Russian].
Dili, Dzh. (2000). Basics of Semiotics. Lviv: Arsenal [in Ukrainian].
Kazakov, Ye. F. (2013). The soul of primitive man. Vestnik of the Kemerovo State University, № 4 (56), 197–201 [in Russian].
Levi-Stros, K. (2000). The Way of the Masks. Moscow: Respublika [in Russian].
Lotman, Yu. M. (1992). Culture and Explosion. Moscow: Gnosis [in Russian].
Petrov, M. K. (2004). Language, sign, culture. Moscow: Editorial URSS [in Russian].
Science of Spirit. Embodied Philosophy. URL: http://www.perthnow.com.au/travel/virtual-tourism-takes-off/story-e6frg3tu1111113851697.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).