Diversity of forms of Islam: invariance and variability
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-0285.2.2020.222191Keywords:
Islam, heterogeneity of Islam, forms of Islam, Islamism, Muslim culture.Abstract
The purpose of the article is to analyze the nature of the heterogeneity of Islam in the field of Muslim culture and to determine the moderators of the variability of its forms. Methodology. The culturology analysis of Islam in the interdisciplinary space of the social sciences and humanities is the conceptual methodological core of the research. For a comprehensive study of the phenomenon, a civilizational approach was used, which made it possible to realize the uniqueness of the Muslim world as a local civilization and the functional role of the Islamic religion in it. The research strategy is based on system analysis in the author’s interpretation. The phenomenon of Islam is interpreted as an integral system in the totality of relations and connections between the invariant and variable components. Scientific novelty. To study the problem of the diversity of forms of Islam, the author's model of the system method, based on the dichotomy of the invariant and variable components of the phenomenon, was introduced into scientific circulation. The idea of the variability of Islam in the space of Muslim civilization has been verified. The invariant and variable components of Islam and the moderators of their formation are determined. Conclusions. Based on the paradigm of the invariance of the dogma of Islam and the diversity of its interpretation in the chronotope, the core moderators of the variability of the forms of Islam are established: 1) the absence in the Quran and Sunnah of direct prohibitions in relation to certain aspects of worldly life; the absence of a unified religious center that monitors the monotony of interpretation of canonical texts;2) the weakening of the connection between the sacred and the profane, which determined the politicization of Islam (in the form of Islamism of all shades); 3) symbiosis of religion and ethnic culture, which led to the dichotomy “classical-folk” Islam; 4) the correlation of the configuration of Islam with the socio-political structure of society, which, in particular, determined the binary opposition of two doctrines of building a Muslim community: the firs doctrine is based on the idea of the revival of the Caliphate, the second doctrine is based on Sharia rule within national borders,References
Alatas S. F. (2001). Alternative Discourses in Southeast Asia. SARI: Jurnal Alam dan Tamadun Melayu. Vol. 19 [in English].
Bowen J. R. (2016). On British Islam: Religion, Law, Everyday Practice in Shari’a Councils. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press [in English].
Bowen J. R. (2013). Religions in Practice: An Approach to the Anthropology Religions. 6th edition. London: Routledge [in English].
Bowen J. R. (2012). A New Anthropology of Islam. Washington: Cambridge University Press [in English].
El-Farouk A. (1991). Internal Migration in the Sudan: Some Demographic and Socio-economic Aspects. Durham: The University of Durham [in English].
Ende W. (2005). Der Islam in der Gegenwart. München: C.H. Beck [in German].
Gaborieau M. (2017). Retour sur la sociologie différentielle de l’islam. Parcours et réflexions. Archives de sciences des religions. Vol. 4, No.180, 77–97 [in French].
Geertz C. (1970). Islam Observed: Religions Development in Moroco and Indonesia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press [in English].
Gellner E. (1981). Muslim Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press [in English].
Hefner R. W. (2003). Global Violence and Indonesian Muslim Politics. American Anthropologist. Vol. 104, No.3, 754–765 [in English].
Hefner R. W. (1997). Islamization and Democratization in Indonesia Islam in an Era of Nation-States: Politics and Religious Renewal in Muslim Southeast Asia. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press [in English].
Matthes J. (2000). Religion in the Social Sciences: A Socio-Epistemological Critique. Akademika. Vol. 56, 85–105 [in English].
McAmis R. D. (2002). Malay Muslims: The History and Challenge of Resurgent Islam in Southeast Asia. Michigan: Eerdmans [in English].
Moten A. R. (2010). Islamization of Knowledge in Theory and Practice: The Contribution of Sayyid Abul A’La Mawdûdi. Islamic Studies. Vol. 43, No.2, 247–272 [in English].
Muhammad Al-H. (2018). A la Decouverte de l’Islam. Paris: Editions Assia [in French].
Salvatore A. (2016). Sociology of Islam. Knowledge. Power and Civility. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley [in English].
See H. P. (2010). Islamisation of Knowledge: Islamic Sociology and Anthropology in Theory and Practice. Al-Shajarah: Journal of the International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization. Vol. 15, No.1, 83–110 [in English].
Smith D. E. (2016) South Asian Politics and Religion. Prinseton: Princeton University Press [in English].
Abdulatipov R. G. (2001). Management of ethnopolitical processes: questions of theory and practice. Moscow: Slavyanskiy dialog [in Russian].
Aklaev A. R. (2008). Ethnopolitical Conflictology: Analysis and Management. Moscow: Delo [in Russian].
Al-Attas S. M. (2001). An Introduction to the Metaphysics of Islam: An Outline of the Fundamental Elements of the Muslim Worldview. Moscow: Kuala Lumpur [in Russian].
Bashirov L. A. (2009). Islam in the context of ethnopolitical processes in modern Russia. Doctoral thesis. Moscow [in Russian].
Dobaev I. P. (2003). Islamic Radicalism: Essence, Ideology, Political Practice. Doctoral thesis. Rostov-on-Don [in Russian].
Zhdanov N. V. (1989). Islam on the threshold of the XXI century. Moscow: Politizdat [in Russian].
Levin Z. I. (2014). Essays on the nature of Islamism. Moscow: IS RAS [in Russian].
Nechitailo D. A. (2011). Contemporary radical Islamism. Strategy and tactics. Moscow: Nauka [in Russian].
Prozorov S. M. (2004). Islam as an ideological system. Moscow: Vostochnaya literatura RAN. T.1 [in Russian].
Raguzin V. N. (1999). Ethno-confessional relations in modern Russia: state, problems, contradictions. Socio-philosophical analysis. Doctoral thesis. Moscow [in Russian].
Tishkov V. A. (2001). Society in Armed Conflict: Ethnography of the Chechen War. Moscow: Nauka [in Russian].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).