The language of the media as an indicator of the language culture of modern society

Authors

  • Maryna Lysyniuk

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-0285.2.2020.222243

Keywords:

culture, media language, literary language, language norm, media discourse

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to analyze the current state of the language of the Ukrainian media as an indicator of the linguistic culture of modern society. Research methodology. The interdisciplinary nature of the study led to the use of general scientific methods, in particular, unstructured systematic observation and descriptive technique. The scientific novelty lies in the generalization of linguistic trends in modern media, in explaining the reasons for linguistic shifts in recent decades. The article notes the dominant position in the stylistic system of our time of the language of the media, which has become the main factor in the productive functioning of the Ukrainian language, a factor that determines its cultural, historical, and historical and linguistic originality. In addition, the language of the media plays the role of a kind of model of the national language in the information society, largely shaping literary norms, language tastes, and preferences, influencing the perception of politics, art, literature, and the like. Hence the urgent need to comply with the language of the media literary norms. Conclusions. The conclusions note that one of the most important areas of studying the cultural aspect of the language of the media is to find out how the latter affects culture. The essence of this influence lies in the fact that the language of the media, which covers practically unlimited topics, significantly affects the literary language, and through it, the culture. The language of the media enriches the literary language, saturating it with evaluative turns, forming a refined language, developing techniques, and methods of discussion and polemics. Developing a literary language, the language of the media also contributes to the development of culture due to, for example, the qualities of speech such as flexibility, wealth, and a variety of functions. It is emphasized that the power and advantage of journalism plays an important role in the language of the media - in the direct impact on the addressee, the audience. Therefore, the mission of a journalist is to positively influence the mass audience, to correct its motivation, behavior, and worldview. It is concluded that the language of the media should be exemplary in terms of the competent use of linguistic ethics, correct word usage, the richness of vocabulary, expressive word-formation. Attention is drawn to the fact that the role of neological vocabulary in the media, which reflects the current processes in society, remains a problem in media speech. Further research is also required by the question of the characteristics of the media language and the prospects for its development.

References

Agranovich, S. Z., Samorukova, I. V. (1997). Harmony - the goal is harmony. Moscow: MISiS [in Russian].

Babych, N. D. (2003). Practical stylistics and culture of the Ukrainian language. Lviv: Svit [in Ukrainian].

Betsenko, T. P. (2017). Linguo-cultural analysis of the literary text in the modern scientific and educational philological dimension. Actual problems of philology and translation studies. 2017. Vol. 12. pp. 18–22 [in Ukrainian].

Bibik, S. P. (2013). Oral literary language in the Ukrainian culture of everyday life: communicative-pragmatic and normative aspects: Abstract of the Ph.D. thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Bilograts, H., Nechypir, H. (2029). Linguistic errors of leading Ukrainian TV channels. Bulletin of the National University "Lviv Polytechnic". Series: Journalistic Sciences. 2019. No. 3. pp. 129–135 [in Ukrainian].

Bilyanska, O. (2003). Language aggression as the antipode of speech culture. Television and radio journalism. Lviv, pp. 35–42 [in Ukrainian].

Gorbanevsky, M. V. (2007). About responsibility for the word. Russian speech. 2007. No. 1. pp. 69–73 [in Russian].

Yelisovenko, Y. P. (2001). Culture and speech technique in television and radio journalism. Style and text. Kyiv. pp. 45–52 [in Ukrainian].

Ermolenko, S. Y. (1999). Essays on Ukrainian literature (stylistics and culture of language) / resp. ed. L. O. Wildflower. Kyiv: Dovira [in Ukrainian].

Zaitseva, S. (2012). Implementation of the communicative function of language in the Internet blog. Scientific notes of the V.I. Vernadsky. Series “Philology. Social communication. Vol. 25 (64). No. 1. Simferopol. pp. 71–75 [in Ukrainian].

Zalinskaya, I. Ya. (2012). Communicative features of the Ukrainian language in live radio and television: Abstract of Ph.D. thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Kononenko, P., Kononenko, T. (2013). Ukrainian studies of the XXI century: state, problems, prospects of development as a system of integrative knowledge. Ukrainian studies. No. 2. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Ukr_2013_2_3 (access date: 15.04.2018) [in Ukrainian].

Krivenko, B. V. (1993). The language of mass communication: the lexico-semiotic aspect. Voronezh [in Russian].

Culture of Russian speech (1999). ed. prof. L.K. Graudina and prof. N.R. Shiryaeva. Moscow [in Russian].

Literary norm and language practice (2013). [Yermolenko SY, Bibik SP, Kots TA etc.]; for order. S. Ya. Yermolenko. Nizhyn [in Ukrainian].

Mitchuk, O. (2003). New socio-political vocabulary of modern media. Television and radio journalism: collection. scientific method wash. Lviv, pp. 43–51 [in Ukrainian].

Ponomariv, O. (2013). Ukrainian word for all and for everyone. Kyiv: Lybid [in Ukrainian].

Potebnya, A. A. (1993). Thought and language. Kiev: Nauka [in Russian].

Serbenska, O. A. (2002). Broadcasting in the relationship with oral language. Television and radio journalism: collection. scientific method wash. Lviv. pp. 32–37 [in Ukrainian].

Serbenska, O. (2002). Surzhyk: "low language" disorder or language pathology. Television and radio journalism: collection. scientific method wash. Lviv. pp. 23–28 [in Ukrainian].

Sirotinina, O. B. (2008). Positive and negative consequences of twenty years of "freedom" of Russian speech. Problems of speech communication. Issue. 8, pp. 8–13 [in Russian].

Solganik, G. Ya. (2005). On the structure and the most important parameters of publicistic speech (the language of the media). Language of modern journalism. Moscow. pp. 13–30 [in Russian].

Sorokin, Yu. A. (1994). Ethnic conflictology. Samara: Russian Lyceum [in Russian].

Stishov, A. O. (2005). Ukrainian vocabulary of the late twentieth century: (On the material of the language of the media). 2nd ed., Reworked. Kyiv: Pugach [in Ukrainian].

Shturnak, O. (2003). Violation of language norms on Ukrainian TV channels (UT-1, 1 1, INTER). Television and radio journalism: collection. scientific method wash. Lviv. pp. 51–57 [in Ukrainian].

Yatsimirskaya, M. (2004). The culture of the professional language of the journalist. Lviv: PAIS [in Ukrainian].

Published

2020-12-30

Issue

Section

Культурологія