CEREMONIALISM OF EMILE DURKHEIM WITHIN THE FORMATION OF HERMENEUTICS OF CULTURE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32461/149901Keywords:
сult, culture, ritual, religion, epistemologyAbstract
Purpose of the article is to discover specific, according to the instructions of the epistemology of Durkheim, incompatible installation as an initiative, imitation incentives of the rituals, presented with a detailed description of traditions and customs, which together form the construction of the theoretical concept of this kind of explanations. A methodology is an integrated approach, which is determined by the ritual basis of cultural processes, formed by folklore genesis and conceptually covered by the interdisciplinary approach, according to the works of E. Durkheim. The scientific novelty of the work is the perspective of the concept of Durkheim from the positions of the possibilities of the hermeneutics of the culture in the cosmological generalizations of mental stereotypes in it. Conclusions. The cosmology of mythmaking and the epistemology of Durkheim constitute qualities that interpret the scientific exposition and are explained by themselves, which traces the unity of ideas about the ideal beginnings of the world and the usage of them in the practice of ritual and life as such.
References
Александер Д. Об интеллектуальных истоках «сильной программы». Социологическое обозрение. Москва: НИУ ВШЭ, 2010. т.9, №2. С 5.
Вебер М. Избранное. Протестантская этика и дух капитализма. Москва: Центр гуманитарных инициатив, 2016. 656 с.
Гофман И. Представление себя другим в повседневной жизни / Пер. с англ. и вступ. статья А.Д. Ковалева. Москва: «КАНОН-пресс-Ц», «Кучково поле», 2000. 304 с.
Ганнеп А. ван. Обряды перехода: Семантическое изучение обрядов. Москва: Восточная литература, 2002. 198 с.
Дюркгейм Э. Элементарные формы религиозной жизни. Тотемистическая система в Австралии. (Введение, Глава 1.). Классики мирового религиоведения. Антология. Т. 2. Москва , 1998. С. 174-230.
Коллинз Р. Четыре социологических традиции. Москва: Территория будущего, 2009. 320 с.
Леви-Брюль Л. Сверхъестественное в первобытном мышлении. Москва: Педагогика-Пресс, 1999. 608 с.
Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Манифест Коммунистичекой партии.Сочинения. 2-е изд., Т. 4. Москва: Государственное издательство политической литературы, 1955. С. 419-459.
Роулз Э. У. Эпистемология Дюркгейма: незамеченный аргумент. Социологическое обозрение. Москва, 2014. Том 13. №2 С. 84.
Фюстель де Куланж Н.-Д. Гражданская община древнего мира / Пер. с фр. под ред. проф. Д. Н. Кудрявского. Санкт-Петербург: 1906. 495 с.
Шульга Е. Проблематика предпонимания в герменевтике. Москва: ИФ РАН, 2004. 174 с.
Щепановская Е. Методологические проблемы герменевтического изучения культуры: реферат соискателя кафедры теоретической и прикладной культурологии. Санкт-Петербург: СПбГУ, 2008. 57с.
Юрий М. Социология культуры. Киев: Кондор, 2006. 304 с.
Durkheim, E. and Mauss, M. Primitive classification. London: Routledge, 1970.
Nisbet R. The sociology of Emile Durkheim. N. Y.: Oxford University Press, 1974.
Parsons T. The Structure of Social Action. A Study of Social Theory with special reference to a group of recent European writers. New York: The Free Press, 1968 (1937). Vol.2. 837 p.
Alexander, D. Ob (2010). Intellectualnih istokah «silnoi program» Sociologicheskoe obozrenie. 2010. 9, 2. Moscow: NIU VShE [in Russian].
Veber, M. Selection (2016). Protestantska ethica i duh capitalisma. Moscow: Center Humanitarian Initiatives [in Russian].
Gofman, I. Predstavlenie sebya drugim v povsednevnoj zhizni (2000). Moscow: «KANON-press-C», «Kuchkovo pole» [in Russian].
Gannep, A. van. (2002). Obryady perekhoda: Semanticheskoe izuchenie obryadov. Moscow: Vostochnaya literature [in Russian].
Durkheim, E. (1998). EHlementarnye formy religioznoj zhizni. Totemisticheskaya sistema v Avstralii. (Vvedenie, Glava 1.) Klassiki mirovogo religiovedeniya. Antologiya Moscow: 2, 174-230. [in Russian].
Collins, R. (2009). Hetyre sociologicheskih tradicii Moscow: Territoriya budushchego. Moscow: Territoriya budushchego [in Russian].
Levy-Bruhl, L. (1999). Super Sverh"estestvennoe v pervobytnom myshlenii. Moscow: Pedagogika-Press [in Russian].
Marks K., Engels F. (1955). Manifest Communist Partii. Sochineniya. 2-e 4. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo politicheskoj literatury [in Russian].
Rawles, A. W. (2014). Epistemologia Durkheima: an unnoticed argument nezamechennyj argument. Sociologicheskoe obozrenie. 13. 2, 84. Moscow: [in Russian].
Füstel de Coulanges, N.-D. (1906). Grazhdanskaya obshchina drevnego mira Per. s fr. pod red. prof D. N. Kudryavskiy. Saint Petersburg: SPbGU [in Russian].
Shulga, E. (2004). The problemanie predponimaniya v germenevtike. Moscow: IF RAN [in Russian].
Schepanovskaia, E. (2008). Metodologicheskie problemy germenevticheskogo izucheniya kul'tury: referat soiskatelya kafedry teoreticheskoj i prikladnoj kul'turologii. Sankt Petersburg: Sankt Petersburg State University [in Russian].
Yuri, M. (2006). Sociologiya kul'tury. Kyiv: Condor [in Ukrainian].
Durkheim, Е. & Mauss, M. (1970). Primitive classification. London: Routledge [in England].
Nisbet, R. The sociology of Emile Durkheim. (1974). New York: Oxford University Press [in USA].
Parsons, T. (1968 (1937)). The Structure of Social Action. A Study of Social Theory with special reference to a group of recent European writers. New York: The Free Press [in USA].
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Halyna Volkova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
