The prerequisites for the emergence of culture industrial management
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-2180.34.2018.184765Keywords:
культура менеджменту, індустріальне суспільство, передумови.Abstract
The purpose of the article theoretical analysis and generalization of the preconditions of
culture industrial management, which will contribute to the cultural enrichment of science with new
knowledge about the formation of the management culture in the industrial society. The
methodology of the research is the dialectical principle of cognition, systemic, sociocultural and
historical approaches, the fundamental tenets of the theory and history of culture management.
Used General scientific and interdisciplinary methods of research: analysis and synthesis,
induction and deduction, comparison, generalization, formalization. The scientific novelty of the
obtained results lies in identifying objective prerequisites for the emergence of culture industrial
management. Conclusions. The main prerequisites of the formation of the culture of industrial
management are: first, European science and mechanistic, deriving from the Newton's picture of
the worldview of reality as a machine, and atomism (individualism), rationality and social
Darwinism, as the "natural law" on mshvidoba the struggle for existence: secondly, protestant
ethics which justified a making money and accumulation of riches; thirdly, political economy,
which presented an economy as a machine which operates after the laws of Newtonian mechanics,
only in place of motion of the masses there was motion of commodities, money and labor force;
fourthly, large scientific and technical openings, that required new forms and methods of organization of management; fifthly, theoretical, philosophical and cultural science developments
which appeared in the countries of Europe and USA: ideas of Ch. Babbage about specialization
and division of labour, A. Ure about philosophy of factory production, B. Trentowski, about attitude
of philosophy toward cybernetics as art of management, R. Owen about the socially oriented
management. It follows to consider at the beginning of the development of the autonomous theory of
industrial management 1886 when on collections of the American society of engineers-mechanics
the lecture of H. Taun was presented «Engineer as an economist», which defined the evolution of
scientific schools and culture of industrial management.
Key words: management culture, industrial society, pre-conditions.
References
Ахутин А. В. Поворотные времена. Санкт-Петербург : Наука, 2005. 743 с.
Бэкон Ф. Сочинения : в 2-х т. Пер. с англ. Москва : Мысль, 1978. Т. 2. 576 с.
Вебер М. Протестантская этика и дух капитализма. Пер. с нем. Москва : ДиректМедиа, 2016. 178 с.
Гайденко П. П. Научная рациональность и философский разум. Москва : ПрогрессТрадиция, 2003. 528 с.
Гейзенберг В. Избранные труды. Пер. с нем. Москва: Эдиториал, 2001. 616 с.
Гоббс Т. Левіафан, або Суть, будова і повноваження держави церковної та цивільної. Пер. з англ. Київ : Дух і Літера, 2000. 600 с.
Декарт Р. Рассуждение о методе. Москва: Академический проект, 2017. 205 с.
Друкер П. Управление в обществе будущего. Москва: Вильямс, 2007. 320 с.
Дункан Дж. Основополагающие идеи в менеджменте. Пер. с англ. Москва : Дело, 1996. 420 с.
Кант И. Критика чистого разума. Пер. с нем. Москва : Эксмо, 2016. 784 с.
Лейбниц Г. Сочинения : в 4-х т. Пер. с нем. Москва : Мысль, 1983. Т. 1. 636 с.
Маркс К. Капитал. Критика политической экономии : в 4-х т. Пер. с нем. Москва : Манн, Иванов и Фербер, 2013. Т. 1. 565 с.
Мартинишин Я. М., Коваленко Є. Я. Формування сучасної системи управління життєдіяльністю суспільства. Вісник Київського національного університету культури і мистецтв. Серія: Менеджмент соціокультурної діяльності. 2018. Вип. 1. С. 7–24.
Мартинишин Я. М., Хлистун О. С. Феномен ідей в управлінні життєдіяльністю суспільства. Вісник Київського національного університету культури і мистецтв. Серія: Менеджмент соціокультурної діяльності. 2018. Вип. 2. С. 7–25.
Милль Дж. Основы политической экономии с некоторыми приложениями к социальной философии. Пер. с англ. Москва : Эксмо, 2007. 1040 с.
Минцберг Г. Создание эффективной организации. Пер. с англ. Санкт-Петербург : Питер, 2011. 502 с.
Сен-Симон А. Сочинения : в 2-х т. Пер. с фр. Москва : АСТ, 2015. Т. 1. 956 с.
Смит А. Исследование о природе и причинах богатства народов. Пер. с англ. Москва : Эксмо, 2016. 1056 с.
Федюкин В. К. История техники и технологий. Москва : Политехника, 2007. 416 с.
Babbage Ch. On the Economy of Machinery and Manufactures. Cambridge : Cambridge university press, 2009. 343 р.
Bowler P. Evolution: The History of an Idea. Berkeley : University of California Press, 2003. 412 р.
Marshall A. Elements of Economics of Industry. London : Forgotten Books, 2015. 448 р.
Owen R. Outline of the Rational System of Society. London : Nabu Press, 2015. 28 р.
Trentowski B. Stosunek filozofii do cybernetyki czyli sztuki rządzenia narodem. Poznań : Żupański, 1843. 268 s.
Ure A. The Philosophy Manufactures. London : Charles Knight, 1835. 480 р.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Єлена Коваленко
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).