Changes in parameters of hemodynamics in abdominal delivery with different methods of anesthesia

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4798.2020.193841

Keywords:

caesarean section, central and peripheral hemodynamics, general anesthesia, spinal anesthesia, hemodynamic types of circulation, risk, arterial hypotension

Abstract

Aim. To study and evaluate changes in the basic parameters of central and peripheral hemodynamics of the maternal organs in caesarean section (CS) with different methods of anesthesia.

Materials and methods. 127 pregnant women were divided into 4 subgroups: Ia (n=31) – general anesthesia (GA) using Ketamine, Ib (n=31) – GA with Sodium Thiopental, IIa (n=31) – spinal anesthesia (SA), IIb (n=34) – SA with Ondansetron 8 mg intravenous. The assessment was performed in 5 stages: 1 – initial; 2 – beginning of operation; 3 – fetal extraction; 4 – end of operation; 5 – 12 hours after operation. The main indicators of hemodynamics were analyzed: systolic (SAP), diastolic (DAP) and mean (MAP) arterial pressure, stroke volume of the heart (SV), cardiac output (CO), cardiac index (CI), total peripheral vascular resistance (TPR).

Results. Maximum increase of SAP, DAP, MAP, CI, CO in GA groups was found at the prenatal stage. Decrease of SAP, DAP, MAP in SA groups was indicated. Hypotension in IIa subgroup required correction with Mesatone in 23 women, while only five patients from IIb subgroup had a correction of hypotension with Mesatone.

Conclusion. In subgroups Ia and Ib, major hemodynamic changes were noted at the prenatal stage, which is manifested in energetically less favorable functioning of the cardiovascular system. CS with SA using Ondansetron was accompanied by favorable hemodynamic shifts at all the stages (especially at the prenatal stage), what is indicating "hemodynamic safety" of that method of anesthesia

Author Biography

Marine Georgiyants, Kharkiv Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education Amosova str., 58, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61176

MD, Professor

References

  1. Mysovskaia, Iu. S. (2015). Dinamika pokazatelei operativnogo rodorazresheniia. Biulleten medicinskikh internet-konferencii, 5 (5), 436–437.
  2. Kulikov, A. V., Shifman, E. M. (2018). Anesteziia, intensivnaia terapiia i reanimaciia v akusherstve i ginekologii. Klinicheskie rekomendacii. Protokoly lecheniia. Moscow: Medicina, 824.
  3. Ghaffari, S., Dehghanpisheh, L., Tavakkoli, F. et. al. (2018). The effect of spinal versus general anesthesia on quality of life in women undergoing cesarean delivery on maternal request. Cureus, 10 (12), 371. doi: http://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.3715
  4. Mamovich, N. V., Kinzhalova, S. V., Makarov, R. A., Shakirov, R. T. (2019). Anesthetic management of abdominal delivery in females with multiple pregnancy. Messenger of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation, 16 (4), 24–30. doi: http://doi.org/10.21292/2078-5658-2019-16-4-24-30
  5. Khan, Z., Eftekhar, N., Barrak, R. (2019). General versus spinal anesthesia during caesarean section: a narrative review. Archives of Anesthesia and Critical Care, 5 (1), 18–21. doi: http://doi.org/10.18502/aacc.v5i1.743
  6. Nag, D. S., Samaddar, D. P., Chatterjee, A., Kumar, H., Dembla, A. (2015). Vasopressors in obstetric anesthesia: a current perspective. World Journal of Clinical Cases, 3, 58–64. doi: http://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v3.i1.58
  7. Chen, D., Qi, X., Huang, X., Xu, Y., Qiu, F., Yan, Y., Li, Y. (2018). Efficacy and Safety of Different Norepinephrine Regimens for Prevention of Spinal Hypotension in Cesarean Section: A Randomized Trial. BioMed Research International, 2018, 1–8. doi: http://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2708175
  8. Committee on practice bulletins – obstetrics. Practice bulletin No. 177: Obstetric analgesia and anesthesia (2017). Obstetrics and gynecology, 129 (4), 73–89. doi: http://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000002018
  9. Honcharenko, M. S., Chykalo, T. M. (2011). Doslidzhennia adaptatsiinykh mozhlyvostei i fraktalnykh kharakterystyk kardioritma studentiv Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni V. N. Karazina z riznymy typamy krovoobihu. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni V.N.Karazina. Seriia: biolohiia, 13 (947), 170–175.
  10. Spicin, A. P., Kushkova, N. E., Kolodkina, E. V. (2018). Osobennosti centralnoi gemodinamiki u lic molodogo vozrasta v zavisimosti ot otlichii fakticheskoi chastoty serdechnykh sokraschenii. Zdorove naseleniia i sreda obitaniia, 7 (304), 27–30.
  11. Iupatov, E. Iu., Fatkullin, I. F. (2006). Znachenie issledovaniia gemodinamiki beremennykh dlia ocenki effektivnosti kompleksnoi terapii pozdnego gestoza. Kazanskii medicinskii zhurnal, 87 (4). 288–291.
  12. Dyer, R. A., Reed, A. R., van Dyk, D., Arcache, M. J., Hodges, O., Lombard, C. J. et. al. (2009). Hemodynamic Effects of Ephedrine, Phenylephrine, and the Coadministration of Phenylephrine with Oxytocin during Spinal Anesthesia for Elective Cesarean Delivery. Anesthesiology, 111 (4), 753–765. doi: http://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0b013e3181b437e0

Published

2019-01-30

How to Cite

Georgiyants, M., & Seredenko, N. (2019). Changes in parameters of hemodynamics in abdominal delivery with different methods of anesthesia. ScienceRise: Medical Science, (1 (34), 57–62. https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4798.2020.193841

Issue

Section

Medical Science