Tactical and technical aspects of minimally invasive left internal mammary artery – left anterior descending artery bypass and hybrid coronary revascularization on its basis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4798.2020.213906Keywords:
hybrid coronary revascularization, mini-invasive mammary artery-left anterior descending artery bypass, coronary artery stenting, thoracotomyAbstract
Reducing surgical trauma is one of the obvious ways of reducing perioperative risks and improving surgical techniques, which is also very positively perceived by patients. Hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) is one of the ways of minimizing surgical trauma during coronary revascularization.
Objectives: to note the tactical and technical aspects of the minimally invasive left internal mammary artery-left anterior descending artery bypass (mini-LIMA-LAD) and HCR, which allow benefiting from these techniques of myocardial revascularization over the traditional ones.
Materials and methods: Between 2011 and 2019, 39 mini-LIMA-LAD operations were performed at the SI “V. T. Zaycev IGUS NAMSU”. The average age of patients was 60.6±8.2 years, 5 (13 %) of patients were female. In nine patients mini-LIMA-LAD was the first (in eight) or second (in one) stage of the planned HCR.
Results and discussion: There were no perioperative deaths, myocardial infarctions or conversions. At a median follow-up time of 49.5 [Q1; Q3: 34.3; 70.6] months one patient died 13 months after surgery. Four patients had angina recurrences at different times. The article discusses the tactical and technical aspects of mini-LIMA-LAD and HCR, which allow benefiting from these techniques of myocardial revascularization over the traditional ones.
Conclusions: Mini-LIMA-LAD and HCR on its basis are a low-traumatic alternative to traditional coronary bypass through sternotomy with acceptable early and long-term results. They have a much better cosmetic effect, especially for women, but are more demanding in surgical technique and tissue handling. The strategy of coronary revascularization described, unlike other less traumatic techniques, does not require expensive additional equipment and can be performed by regular means
References
- Doenst, T., Diab, M., Sponholz, C., Bauer, M., Färber, G. (2017). The Opportunities and Limitations of Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, 114 (46), 777–784. doi: http://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2017.0777
- Hua, K., Zhao, Y., Dong, R., Liu, T. (2018). Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery in China: Multi-Center Experience. Medical Science Monitor, 24, 421–426. doi: http://doi.org/10.12659/msm.905408
- D'Onofrio, A., Gerosa, G. (2015). Shifting a Paradigm of Cardiac Surgery: From Minimally Invasive to Micro-Invasive. The Journal of Heart Valve Disease, 24 (5), 528–530.
- Gallego-Poveda, J., Guerra, N. C., Gonzalez-Rivas, D., Carvalheiro, C., Ferreira, H., Sena, A. et. al. (2017). Cardiac surgery using a single thoracic port – current status and future directions. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 9 (4), 898–902. doi: http://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2017.02.07
- Langer, N. B., Argenziano, M. (2016). Minimally Invasive Cardiovascular Surgery: Incisions and Approaches. Methodist DeBakey Cardiovascular Journal, 12 (1), 4–9. doi: http://doi.org/10.14797/mdcj-12-1-4
- Doenst, T., Lamelas, J. (2017). Do we have enough evidence for minimally-invasive cardiac surgery? A critical review of scientific and non-scientific information. The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery, 58 (4), 613–623. doi: http://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.16.09446-5
- Easterwood, R. M., Bostock, I. C., Nammalwar, S., McCullough, J. N., Iribarne, A. (2018). The evolution of minimally invasive cardiac surgery: from minimal access to transcatheter approaches. Future Cardiology, 14 (1), 75–87. doi: http://doi.org/10.2217/fca-2017-0048
- Melly, L., Torregrossa, G., Lee, T., Jansens, J.-L., Puskas, J. D. (2018). Fifty years of coronary artery bypass grafting. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 10 (3), 1960–1967. doi: http://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2018.02.43
- Diodato, M., Chedrawy, E. G. (2014). Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: The Past, Present, and Future of Myocardial Revascularisation. Surgery Research and Practice, 2014, 1–6. doi: http://doi.org/10.1155/2014/726158
- Tatoulis, J., Buxton, B. F., Fuller, J. A. (2004). Patencies of 2,127 arterial to coronary conduits over 15 years. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 77 (1), 93–101. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-4975(03)01331-6
- Otsuka, F., Yahagi, K., Sakakura, K., Virmani, R. (2013). Why is the mammary artery so special and what protects it from atherosclerosis? Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 2 (4), 519–526. doi: http://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2013.07.06
- Ahn, J.-M., Park, D.-W., Lee, C. W., Chang, M., Cavalcante, R., Sotomi, Y. et. al. (2017). Comparison of Stenting Versus Bypass Surgery According to the Completeness of Revascularization in Severe Coronary Artery Disease. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 10 (14), 1415–1424. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2017.04.037
- Head, S. J., Milojevic, M., Daemen, J., Ahn, J.-M., Boersma, E., Christiansen, E. H. et. al. (2018). Mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting for coronary artery disease: a pooled analysis of individual patient data. The Lancet, 391 (10124), 939–948. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30423-9
- Iqbal, M. B., Ilsley, C., De Robertis, F., Lane, R., Kabir, T., Bahrami, T. et. al. (2017). Comparison of Outcomes of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Using Internal Mammary Graft Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Isolated Proximal Left Anterior Descending Narrowing. The American Journal of Cardiology, 119 (5), 719–726. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.11.031
- Itagaki, S., Reddy, R. C. (2013). Options for left internal mammary harvest in minimal access coronary surgery. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 5 (6), 638–640. doi: http://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2013.11.02
- Gong, W., Cai, J., Wang, Z., Chen, A., Ye, X., Li, H., Zhao, Q. (2016). Robot-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting improves short-term outcomes compared with minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 8 (3), 459–468. doi: http://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2016.02.67
- Sabashnikov, A., Patil, N. P., Weymann, A., Mohite, P. N., Zych, B., García Sáez, D. et. al. (2014). Outcomes after different non-sternotomy approaches to left single-vessel revascularization: a comparative study with up to 10-year follow-up. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 46 (4), e48–e55. doi: http://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezu287
- Yuh, D. D., Vricella, L. A., Baumgartner, W. A. (Eds.) (2007). The Johns Hopkins Manual of Cardiothoracic Surgery. New York: McGraw Hill, 449–467.
- Zhao, D. F., Edelman, J. J., Seco, M., Bannon, P. G., Wilson, M. K., Byrom, M. J. et. al. (2017). Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting With and Without Manipulation of the Ascending Aorta. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 69 (8), 924–936. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.11.071
- Albert, A., Ennker, J., Hegazy, Y., Ullrich, S., Petrov, G., Akhyari, P. et. al. (2018). Implementation of the aortic no-touch technique to reduce stroke after off-pump coronary surgery. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 156 (2), 544–554. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.02.111
- McGinn, J. T., Usman, S., Lapierre, H., Pothula, V. R., Mesana, T. G., Ruel, M. (2009). Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Dual-Center Experience in 450 Consecutive Patients. Circulation, 120(11_suppl_1), S78–S84. doi: http://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.108.840041
- Nambiar, P., Mittal, C. (2013). Minimally Invasive Coronary Bypass Using Internal Thoracic Arteries via a Left Minithoracotomy. Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, 8 (6), 420–426. doi: http://doi.org/10.1177/155698451300800607
- Ziankou, A., Ostrovsky, Y. (2015). Early and Midterm Results of No-Touch Aorta Multivessel Small Thoracotomy Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Propensity Score-Matched Study. Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, 10 (4), 258–267. doi: http://doi.org/10.1097/imi.0000000000000185
- Nambiar, P., Kumar, S., Mittal, C. M., Saksena, K. (2018). Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting with bilateral internal thoracic arteries: Will this be the future? The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 155 (1), 190–197. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.07.088
- Harskamp, R. E., Bonatti, J. O., Zhao, D. X., Puskas, J. D., de Winter, R. J., Alexander, J. H., Halkos, M. E. (2014). Standardizing definitions for hybrid coronary revascularization. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 147 (2), 556–560. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.10.019
- Leacche, M., Zhao, D. X., Umakanthan, R., Byrne, J. G. (2012). Do hybrid procedures have proven clinical utility and are they the wave of the future?: hybrid procedures have no proven clinical utility and are not the wave of the future. Circulation, 125 (20), 2504–2510. doi: http://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.111.031138
- Angelini, G., Wilde, P., Salerno, T., Bosco, G., Calafiore, A. (1996). Integrated left small thoracotomy and angioplasty for multivessel coronary artery revascularisation. The Lancet, 347 (9003), 757–758. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(96)90107-5
- Puskas, J. D., Halkos, M. E., DeRose, J. J., Bagiella, E., Miller, M. A., Overbey, J. et. al. (2016). Hybrid Coronary Revascularization for the Treatment of Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 68 (4), 356–365. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.05.032
- Tajstra, M., Hrapkowicz, T., Hawranek, M., Filipiak, K., Gierlotka, M., Zembala, M. et. al. (2018). Hybrid Coronary Revascularization in Selected Patients With Multivessel Disease. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 11 (9), 847–852. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2018.01.271
- Zhurba, O. O., Rudenko, A. V. (2018). Predictors of intraoperative complications and on-pump conversions of isolated coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with coronary artery disease. Emergency medicine, 7 (94), 19–25. doi http://doi.org/10.22141/2224-0586.7.94.2018.150815
- Mankovskyi, H. B. (2019). Viddaleni rezultaty revaskuliaryzatsii miokarda u patsiientiv z ishemichnoiu khvoroboiu sertsia ta porushenniam vuhlevodnoho obminu. Kyiv: DU «NISSKh im. M. M. Amosova NAMN Ukrainy», 19.
- Harskamp, R. E., Brennan, J. M., Xian, Y., Halkos, M. E., Puskas, J. D., Thourani, V. H. et. al. (2014). Practice Patterns and Clinical Outcomes After Hybrid Coronary Revascularization in the United States. Circulation, 130 (11), 872–879. doi: http://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.114.009479
- Neumann, F.-J., Sousa-Uva, M., Ahlsson, A., Alfonso, F., Banning, A. P., Benedetto, U. et. al. (2018). 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. European Heart Journal, 40 (2), 87–165. doi: http://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394
- Chakos, A., Jbara, D., Singh, K., Yan, T. D., Tian, D. H. (2018). Network meta-analysis of antiplatelet therapy following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG): none versus one versus two antiplatelet agents. Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 7 (5), 577–585. doi: http://doi.org/10.21037/acs.2018.09.02
- Babliak, O. D., Demianenko, V. M., Melnyk, Ye. A., Revenko, K. A., Pidhaina, L. V., Stohov, O. S. (2018). Maloinvazyvne bahatosudynne koronarne shuntuvannia v umovakh perednolateralnoi torakotomii. Sertse i sudyny. 1 (61), 65–69.
- Babliak, O. D., Demianenko, V. M., Melnyk, Ye. A., Revenko, K. A., Pidhaina, L. V., Stohov, O. S. (2018). Mini-invazyvne bahatosudynne koronarne shuntuvannia v umovakh shtuchnoho krovoobihu: analiz rannikh rezultativ ta opanuvannia metodyky. Visnyk sertsevo-sudynnoi khirurhii, 4 (33), 18–21.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Oleksandr Pyetkov, Igor Polivenok, Yuri Skibo, Valery Boyko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.
Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.