Tactical and technical aspects of minimally invasive left internal mammary artery – left anterior descending artery bypass and hybrid coronary revascularization on its basis

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4798.2020.213906

Keywords:

hybrid coronary revascularization, mini-invasive mammary artery-left anterior descending artery bypass, coronary artery stenting, thoracotomy

Abstract

Reducing surgical trauma is one of the obvious ways of reducing perioperative risks and improving surgical techniques, which is also very positively perceived by patients. Hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) is one of the ways of minimizing surgical trauma during coronary revascularization.

Objectives: to note the tactical and technical aspects of the minimally invasive left internal mammary artery-left anterior descending artery bypass (mini-LIMA-LAD) and HCR, which allow benefiting from these techniques of myocardial revascularization over the traditional ones.

Materials and methods: Between 2011 and 2019, 39 mini-LIMA-LAD operations were performed at the SI “V. T. Zaycev IGUS NAMSU”. The average age of patients was 60.6±8.2 years, 5 (13 %) of patients were female. In nine patients mini-LIMA-LAD was the first (in eight) or second (in one) stage of the planned HCR.

Results and discussion: There were no perioperative deaths, myocardial infarctions or conversions. At a median follow-up time of 49.5 [Q1; Q3: 34.3; 70.6] months one patient died 13 months after surgery. Four patients had angina recurrences at different times. The article discusses the tactical and technical aspects of mini-LIMA-LAD and HCR, which allow benefiting from these techniques of myocardial revascularization over the traditional ones.

Conclusions: Mini-LIMA-LAD and HCR on its basis are a low-traumatic alternative to traditional coronary bypass through sternotomy with acceptable early and long-term results. They have a much better cosmetic effect, especially for women, but are more demanding in surgical technique and tissue handling. The strategy of coronary revascularization described, unlike other less traumatic techniques, does not require expensive additional equipment and can be performed by regular means

Author Biographies

Oleksandr Pyetkov, Kharkiv Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education Amosova str., 58, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61176

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Surgery of the Heart, Great Vessels and Pediatric Surgery

Igor Polivenok, State Institution “V. T. Zaycev Institute of General and Urgent Surgery National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine” Balakireva entry, 1, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61103

PhD, Head of Department

Department of Interventional Cardiology and Cardiac Intensive Care

Yuri Skibo, Kharkiv Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education Amosova str., 58, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61176

PhD, Head of Department

Department of Surgery of the Heart, Great Vessels and Pediatric Surgery

Valery Boyko, State Institution “V. T. Zaycev Institute of General and Urgent Surgery National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine” Balakireva entry, 1, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61103

MD, Professor, Corresponding Member of NAMS of Ukraine, Director

References

  1. Doenst, T., Diab, M., Sponholz, C., Bauer, M., Färber, G. (2017). The Opportunities and Limitations of Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, 114 (46), 777–784. doi: http://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2017.0777
  2. Hua, K., Zhao, Y., Dong, R., Liu, T. (2018). Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery in China: Multi-Center Experience. Medical Science Monitor, 24, 421–426. doi: http://doi.org/10.12659/msm.905408
  3. D'Onofrio, A., Gerosa, G. (2015). Shifting a Paradigm of Cardiac Surgery: From Minimally Invasive to Micro-Invasive. The Journal of Heart Valve Disease, 24 (5), 528–530.
  4. Gallego-Poveda, J., Guerra, N. C., Gonzalez-Rivas, D., Carvalheiro, C., Ferreira, H., Sena, A. et. al. (2017). Cardiac surgery using a single thoracic port – current status and future directions. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 9 (4), 898–902. doi: http://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2017.02.07
  5. Langer, N. B., Argenziano, M. (2016). Minimally Invasive Cardiovascular Surgery: Incisions and Approaches. Methodist DeBakey Cardiovascular Journal, 12 (1), 4–9. doi: http://doi.org/10.14797/mdcj-12-1-4
  6. Doenst, T., Lamelas, J. (2017). Do we have enough evidence for minimally-invasive cardiac surgery? A critical review of scientific and non-scientific information. The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery, 58 (4), 613–623. doi: http://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.16.09446-5
  7. Easterwood, R. M., Bostock, I. C., Nammalwar, S., McCullough, J. N., Iribarne, A. (2018). The evolution of minimally invasive cardiac surgery: from minimal access to transcatheter approaches. Future Cardiology, 14 (1), 75–87. doi: http://doi.org/10.2217/fca-2017-0048
  8. Melly, L., Torregrossa, G., Lee, T., Jansens, J.-L., Puskas, J. D. (2018). Fifty years of coronary artery bypass grafting. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 10 (3), 1960–1967. doi: http://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2018.02.43
  9. Diodato, M., Chedrawy, E. G. (2014). Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: The Past, Present, and Future of Myocardial Revascularisation. Surgery Research and Practice, 2014, 1–6. doi: http://doi.org/10.1155/2014/726158
  10. Tatoulis, J., Buxton, B. F., Fuller, J. A. (2004). Patencies of 2,127 arterial to coronary conduits over 15 years. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 77 (1), 93–101. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-4975(03)01331-6
  11. Otsuka, F., Yahagi, K., Sakakura, K., Virmani, R. (2013). Why is the mammary artery so special and what protects it from atherosclerosis? Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 2 (4), 519–526. doi: http://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2013.07.06
  12. Ahn, J.-M., Park, D.-W., Lee, C. W., Chang, M., Cavalcante, R., Sotomi, Y. et. al. (2017). Comparison of Stenting Versus Bypass Surgery According to the Completeness of Revascularization in Severe Coronary Artery Disease. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 10 (14), 1415–1424. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2017.04.037
  13. Head, S. J., Milojevic, M., Daemen, J., Ahn, J.-M., Boersma, E., Christiansen, E. H. et. al. (2018). Mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting for coronary artery disease: a pooled analysis of individual patient data. The Lancet, 391 (10124), 939–948. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30423-9
  14. Iqbal, M. B., Ilsley, C., De Robertis, F., Lane, R., Kabir, T., Bahrami, T. et. al. (2017). Comparison of Outcomes of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Using Internal Mammary Graft Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Isolated Proximal Left Anterior Descending Narrowing. The American Journal of Cardiology, 119 (5), 719–726. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.11.031
  15. Itagaki, S., Reddy, R. C. (2013). Options for left internal mammary harvest in minimal access coronary surgery. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 5 (6), 638–640. doi: http://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2013.11.02
  16. Gong, W., Cai, J., Wang, Z., Chen, A., Ye, X., Li, H., Zhao, Q. (2016). Robot-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting improves short-term outcomes compared with minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 8 (3), 459–468. doi: http://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2016.02.67
  17. Sabashnikov, A., Patil, N. P., Weymann, A., Mohite, P. N., Zych, B., García Sáez, D. et. al. (2014). Outcomes after different non-sternotomy approaches to left single-vessel revascularization: a comparative study with up to 10-year follow-up. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 46 (4), e48–e55. doi: http://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezu287
  18. Yuh, D. D., Vricella, L. A., Baumgartner, W. A. (Eds.) (2007). The Johns Hopkins Manual of Cardiothoracic Surgery. New York: McGraw Hill, 449–467.
  19. Zhao, D. F., Edelman, J. J., Seco, M., Bannon, P. G., Wilson, M. K., Byrom, M. J. et. al. (2017). Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting With and Without Manipulation of the Ascending Aorta. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 69 (8), 924–936. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.11.071
  20. Albert, A., Ennker, J., Hegazy, Y., Ullrich, S., Petrov, G., Akhyari, P. et. al. (2018). Implementation of the aortic no-touch technique to reduce stroke after off-pump coronary surgery. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 156 (2), 544–554. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.02.111
  21. McGinn, J. T., Usman, S., Lapierre, H., Pothula, V. R., Mesana, T. G., Ruel, M. (2009). Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Dual-Center Experience in 450 Consecutive Patients. Circulation, 120(11_suppl_1), S78–S84. doi: http://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.108.840041
  22. Nambiar, P., Mittal, C. (2013). Minimally Invasive Coronary Bypass Using Internal Thoracic Arteries via a Left Minithoracotomy. Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, 8 (6), 420–426. doi: http://doi.org/10.1177/155698451300800607
  23. Ziankou, A., Ostrovsky, Y. (2015). Early and Midterm Results of No-Touch Aorta Multivessel Small Thoracotomy Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Propensity Score-Matched Study. Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, 10 (4), 258–267. doi: http://doi.org/10.1097/imi.0000000000000185
  24. Nambiar, P., Kumar, S., Mittal, C. M., Saksena, K. (2018). Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting with bilateral internal thoracic arteries: Will this be the future? The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 155 (1), 190–197. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.07.088
  25. Harskamp, R. E., Bonatti, J. O., Zhao, D. X., Puskas, J. D., de Winter, R. J., Alexander, J. H., Halkos, M. E. (2014). Standardizing definitions for hybrid coronary revascularization. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 147 (2), 556–560. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.10.019
  26. Leacche, M., Zhao, D. X., Umakanthan, R., Byrne, J. G. (2012). Do hybrid procedures have proven clinical utility and are they the wave of the future?: hybrid procedures have no proven clinical utility and are not the wave of the future. Circulation, 125 (20), 2504–2510. doi: http://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.111.031138
  27. Angelini, G., Wilde, P., Salerno, T., Bosco, G., Calafiore, A. (1996). Integrated left small thoracotomy and angioplasty for multivessel coronary artery revascularisation. The Lancet, 347 (9003), 757–758. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(96)90107-5
  28. Puskas, J. D., Halkos, M. E., DeRose, J. J., Bagiella, E., Miller, M. A., Overbey, J. et. al. (2016). Hybrid Coronary Revascularization for the Treatment of Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 68 (4), 356–365. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.05.032
  29. Tajstra, M., Hrapkowicz, T., Hawranek, M., Filipiak, K., Gierlotka, M., Zembala, M. et. al. (2018). Hybrid Coronary Revascularization in Selected Patients With Multivessel Disease. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 11 (9), 847–852. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2018.01.271
  30. Zhurba, O. O., Rudenko, A. V. (2018). Predictors of intraoperative complications and on-pump conversions of isolated coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with coronary artery disease. Emergency medicine, 7 (94), 19–25. doi http://doi.org/10.22141/2224-0586.7.94.2018.150815
  31. Mankovskyi, H. B. (2019). Viddaleni rezultaty revaskuliaryzatsii miokarda u patsiientiv z ishemichnoiu khvoroboiu sertsia ta porushenniam vuhlevodnoho obminu. Kyiv: DU «NISSKh im. M. M. Amosova NAMN Ukrainy», 19.
  32. Harskamp, R. E., Brennan, J. M., Xian, Y., Halkos, M. E., Puskas, J. D., Thourani, V. H. et. al. (2014). Practice Patterns and Clinical Outcomes After Hybrid Coronary Revascularization in the United States. Circulation, 130 (11), 872–879. doi: http://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.114.009479
  33. Neumann, F.-J., Sousa-Uva, M., Ahlsson, A., Alfonso, F., Banning, A. P., Benedetto, U. et. al. (2018). 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. European Heart Journal, 40 (2), 87–165. doi: http://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394
  34. Chakos, A., Jbara, D., Singh, K., Yan, T. D., Tian, D. H. (2018). Network meta-analysis of antiplatelet therapy following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG): none versus one versus two antiplatelet agents. Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 7 (5), 577–585. doi: http://doi.org/10.21037/acs.2018.09.02
  35. Babliak, O. D., Demianenko, V. M., Melnyk, Ye. A., Revenko, K. A., Pidhaina, L. V., Stohov, O. S. (2018). Maloinvazyvne bahatosudynne koronarne shuntuvannia v umovakh perednolateralnoi torakotomii. Sertse i sudyny. 1 (61), 65–69.
  36. Babliak, O. D., Demianenko, V. M., Melnyk, Ye. A., Revenko, K. A., Pidhaina, L. V., Stohov, O. S. (2018). Mini-invazyvne bahatosudynne koronarne shuntuvannia v umovakh shtuchnoho krovoobihu: analiz rannikh rezultativ ta opanuvannia metodyky. Visnyk sertsevo-sudynnoi khirurhii, 4 (33), 18–21.

Downloads

Published

2020-09-30

How to Cite

Pyetkov, O., Polivenok, I., Skibo, Y., & Boyko, V. (2020). Tactical and technical aspects of minimally invasive left internal mammary artery – left anterior descending artery bypass and hybrid coronary revascularization on its basis. ScienceRise: Medical Science, (5 (38), 36–42. https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4798.2020.213906

Issue

Section

Medical Science