Analysis of the structural models of competencies in project management

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2017.100393

Keywords:

competence approach, directed graph, adjacency matrix, closed cycles, analytical search

Abstract

The analysis of structural models that reflect the topology of project management processes using directed graphs is performed. It is shown that the essence of the analysis of directed graphs is connected with the determination of closed cycles. To solve the problem of analysis of structural objects, it is proposed to use the method of analytical definition of cycles in complex systems describing the set of competences in the field of project management. At the same time, it is necessary to take into account the industry component of the field of knowledge. The requirements for the evaluation of competencies, as well as for the system of training professionals in the field of project management, it would be very logical to harmonize with the specifics of the industry. At the same time, universal models do not offer acceptable solutions. Therefore, in this research, it is proposed to resolve this contradiction on the basis of an analysis of the system of competencies as directed graph.

The possibility of structural analysis of directed graphs due to specific properties of adjacency and reachability matrices is proved, which makes it possible to automate the structural analysis of control schemes based on the competence approach.

Aspects of knowledge management are traditionally considered as the main component of project management and as an object of study in the professional training of project managers. The second direction is, strangely enough, the least studied, although the training and trainings allow to resolve the contradictions of the project management. Existing approaches to knowledge management in the field of professional project management do not always provide an effective formation of the education trajectory due to the lack of models, methods and means of analyzing the relation of competencies. The mutual relations of competences form the core of knowledge that forms the basis of fundamentally new provisions in the formation of the content of academic disciplines. The theoretical provisions of this study can be applied in the practice of professional project management and advanced training to form the trajectory of career development of personnel.

Author Biographies

Dmytro Lukianov, Belarusian State University, 4, Nezavisimosti ave., Minsk, Belarus, 220030

PhD, Assistant Professor

Department of General and Clinical Psychology

Olexii Kolesnikov, Odessa National Polytechnic University, 1, Shevchenko ave., Odessa, Ukraine, 65044

PhD, Assistant Professor

Department of Systems Management Life Safety

Katerina Dmitrenko, Odessa National Polytechnic University, 1, Shevchenko ave., Odessa, Ukraine, 65044

Department of Systems Management Life Safety

Viktor Gogunskii, Odessa National Polytechnic University, 1, Shevchenko ave., Odessa, Ukraine, 65044

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor

Department of Systems Management Life Safety

References

  1. Euler, L. (1741). Solutio problematis ad geometriam situs pertinentis. Commentarii Academiae Scientiarum Imperialis Petropolitanae, 8, 128–140.
  2. Tutte, W. T. (2012). Graph Theory As I Have Known It. Oxford University Press, 164.
  3. ICB ‑ IPMA Competence Baseline, Version 3.0. (2006). Project Management Association, 212. Available: http://www.ipma.world/assets/ICB3.pdf
  4. ICB ‑ IPMA Individual Competence Baseline, Version 4.0. (2015). International Project Management Association, 432. Available: http://products.ipma.world/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/IPMA_ICB_4_0_WEB.pdf
  5. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide). Ed. 5. (2013). Project Management Institute, 619.
  6. Project Manager Competency Development Framework. Ed. 2. (2007). Project Management Institute, 81.
  7. Kolesnikova, K. V., Lukianov, D. V. (2013). Analiz strukturnoi modeli kompetentsii z upravlinnia proektamy natsionalnoho standartu Ukrainy. Management of development of complex systems, 13, 19–27. Available: http://urss.knuba.edu.ua/files/zbirnyk-13/19-27.pdf
  8. Kafarov, V. V., Perov, V. L., Meshalkin, V. P. (1974). Printsipy matematicheskogo modelirovaniia himiko-tehnologicheskih sistem. Moscow: Khimiia, 344.
  9. Qureshi, S. M., Kang, C. (2015). Analysing the organizational factors of project complexity using structural equation modelling. International Journal of Project Management, 33 (1), 165–176. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.04.006
  10. Wen, Q., Qiang, M. (2016). Coordination and Knowledge Sharing in Construction Project-Based Organization: A Longitudinal Structural Equation Model Analysis. Automation in Construction, 72, 309–320. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2016.06.002
  11. Kaiser, M. G., El Arbi, F., Ahlemann, F. (2015). Successful project portfolio management beyond project selection techniques: Understanding the role of structural alignment. International Journal of Project Management, 33 (1), 126–139. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.03.002
  12. Kluge, R., Stein, M., Varro, G., Schurr, A., Hollick, M., Muhlhauser, M. (2016). A systematic approach to constructing incremental topology control algorithms using graph transformation. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing. doi:10.1016/j.jvlc.2016.10.003
  13. Koenen, A.-K., Dochy, F., Berghmans, I. (2015). A phenomenographic analysis of the implementation of competence-based education in higher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 50, 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2015.04.001
  14. Durand, G., Belacel, N., LaPlante, F. (2013). Graph theory based model for learning path recommendation. Information Sciences, 251, 10–21. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2013.04.017
  15. Kolesnikova, E. V., Vaisman, V. A., Velichko, V. A. (2012). Development of the Markov model of states of a project-controlled organization. Modern technologies in engineering, 7, 217‑223.
  16. Kolesnikova, K. V., Olekh, T. M. (2012). Matrix diagram and the «strong connection» indicator value in the projects. Electrical and Computer Systems, 7 (83), 148–153.
  17. Kolesnіkov, O., Gogunskii, V., Kolesnikova, K., Lukianov, D., Olekh, T. (2016). Development of the model of interaction among the project, team of project and project environment in project system. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5(9(83)), 20–26. doi:10.15587/1729-4061.2016.80769
  18. Kolesnikova, K. V., Paliy, S. V. (2014). Method of determining a directed graph ergodic systems project management. Management of development of complex systems, 20, 27‑31. Avaiable: http://urss.knuba.edu.ua/files/zbirnyk-20/8_0.pdf
  19. Biloshchytskyi, A., Kuchansky, A., Biloshchytska, S., Dubnytska, A. (2017). Conceptual Model of Automatic System of Near Duplicates Detection in Electronic Documents. 14-th International Conference «The Experience of Designing and Applications of CAD Systems in Microelectronics» (CADSM’17), IEEE. Polyana, 381–384.

Published

2017-03-30

How to Cite

Lukianov, D., Kolesnikov, O., Dmitrenko, K., & Gogunskii, V. (2017). Analysis of the structural models of competencies in project management. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 2(2(34), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2017.100393

Issue

Section

Information Technologies: Original Research