Development of the estimation methodology for the commercial balance of the market of social and environmental services of forests

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2017.119595

Keywords:

social and ecological potential, market of social and ecological services, commercial balance of the market, natural zones, optimal forest cover.

Abstract

The perspective direction of the development of the economic space of the forest sector is the capitalization of the social and ecological potential of the forest, it makes it necessary to form new ecological systems for the forestry of Ukraine. In particular, the market of social and environmental services of the forest, the object of which is a special commodity is the social and environmental service.

It is shown that the opportunities for establishment of the market for social and ecological forest services are determined by the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of the socio-ecological potential: the level of forest cover, the natural structure of the forest. And also by the magnitude and direction of the demand for the socio-ecological benefits of forests in these or other ethno-natural and economic territories. The ratio of these components is defined as the commercial balance of the market. This raises the need to develop a methodology for evaluation of the commercial balance of the market, which would allow to determine and forecast the opportunities for capitalizing the social and environmental potential of the forest in terms of volume and range, depending on the natural and economic environment of the territories.

The proposed methodology for evaluation of the social and economic potential of forests in the context of the formation of the market for social and environmental services unites three consecutive stages:

– identification of environmental problems and social needs of the territories where the project is planned to establish a market for social and environmental services of the forest, the level of their importance and danger;

– evaluation of the wooded areas that can determine the volume and quality and structure of forests (tree species, age), which can determine the range of services;

– analysis of the marketing environment that allows to determine the possible volume and direction of demand.

Practical application of the methodology will make it possible to determine the opportunities and prospects for capitalizing the social and environmental benefits of forests in certain ethno-prodigal and economic areas, that is, with the opportunities and prospects for the formation and functioning of the market for social and ecological forest services.

Author Biography

Anastasiy Suska, Kharkiv Petro Vasylenko National Technical University of Agriculture, 44, Alchevsky str., Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61002

PhD, Corresponding Member of the Academy of Economic Sciences of Ukraine, Head of the Department

Department of Wood Technology and Systems Engineering Forest Complex

References

  1. Antonenko, I., Ochrimenko, A. (2006). Renta turystyczna w sferze. Mitdzynarodowej zasobow lesnych: konferencji Naukowej nt: «Rola turystyki strategii I polityce rozwoju gospodarki regionalnej». Gdansk, 477–483.
  2. Berg, A., Ehnstrom, B., Gustafsson, L., Hallingback, T., Jonsell, M., Weslien, J. (1994). Threatened Plant, Animal, and Fungus Species in Swedish Forests: Distribution and Habitat Associations. Conservation Biology, 8 (3), 718–731. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1994.08030718.x
  3. Davies, S. (2003). Private Finance Initiative (PF) and Public Partnerships (PPPs). Definitions and Sources. Cardiff University, 139.
  4. Hawken, P., Lovins, A., Lovins, L. (1999). Natural capitalism: Creating the Next Industrial revolution. Brown: Little, 416.
  5. Isaak, R. (1998). Green Logis: Ecopreneurship, Theory and Ethics. London: Sheffeld Greenleaf, 144. doi:10.4324/9781351283168
  6. Markusen, A. (1994). Sticky laces in slippery space: the political economy jf postward fats – groft regions. Working paper, 79, 24–31.
  7. Mints, A. A. (1972). Ekonomicheskaya otsenka estestvennykh resursov. Nauchno-metodicheskie problemy ucheta geograficheskikh razlichiy v effektivnosti ispol'zovaniya. Moscow: Mysl', 303.
  8. Antonenko, I. Ya., Drobot, O. I. (2010). Mekhanizmy modernizatsii instytutsionalnoho seredovyshcha liso resursnoho rozvytku. Ekonomika pryrodokorystuvannia i okhorony dovkillia, 13 (4), 7–12.
  9. Mishenin, E. V. (1998). Ekologo-ekonomicheskie problemy prirodopol'zovaniya v lesnom komplekse. Sumy: Mrіya, 272.
  10. Nudel'man, M. S. (1987). Sotsіal'no-ekonomicheskie problemy rekreatsionnogo prirodopol'zovaniya. Kyiv: Naukova dumka, 132.
  11. Molchanov, A. A. (1966). Optimal'naya lesistost'. Moscow: Nauka, 210.
  12. Tkach, V. P. (1999). Zaplavni lisy livoberezhnoi Ukrainy ta naukovi osnovy hospodariuvannia v nykh. Lviv: UDLTU, 36.
  13. Mykhovych, A. I. (1972). O hydrolohycheskykh kryteryiakh optymalnoi lesystosty. Lesovodstvo y ahrolesomelyoratsyia, 29, 3–9.

Published

2017-11-30

How to Cite

Suska, A. (2017). Development of the estimation methodology for the commercial balance of the market of social and environmental services of forests. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 6(5(38), 20–24. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2017.119595

Issue

Section

Development of Productive Forces and Regional Economy: Original Research