Diagnostics in lean management system of industrial enterprise
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2018.129872Keywords:
diagnostics as a process, lean manufacturing, value stream, lean manufacturing methods, industrial enterpriseAbstract
The object of research is methods for diagnosing the elements of the value stream of an industrial enterprise in their interaction, taking into account the focus of the result on minimizing waste in the system of lean management. On the organizational and methodological aspects of diagnostics, it is expedient to consider a rational combination of effective methods, in particular the concept of lean production, the use of which is directed, first of all, to overcoming the crisis situation of the industrial enterprise and also continuous assessment of lean changes and effective transformations, minimization of waste and establishment of reserves for possible reduction of unproductive expenses.
Based on the results of the application of the cognitive method and the method of scientific information retrieval, it is established that there is no single approach to the treatment of the essence of diagnostics. But the common position remains the search, identification and identification of problem aspects of the activity and possible prospective tendencies with the purpose of developing alternative options for the best development of the enterprise. Based on the results of the use of critical analysis and logical generalization, it is proposed to consider the diagnostic process through a causative relationship with management functions. This is ensured by the integrated use of a set of expedient methods of lean production within the framework of individual functions.
Further development of the interpretation of «diagnostics» is received as a process from the position of mutually fulfilling rational specific lean methods, techniques, means and procedures. The purpose of the diagnostics is identification of external and internal factors in a directed action (assistance/obstruction) to provide value to the customer and forecast the development of an industrial enterprise.
It is proved that diagnostics in the management system of an industrial enterprise is expedient to realize through the coordination of management functions (accounting, control, analysis, planning, stimulation). Result are focused on eliminating costs non-value-added, reducing to the minimum allowable level of technologically necessary costs non-value-added, searching for hidden reserves of costs to value-added.
References
- Ono, T. (2008). Proizvodstvennaya sistema Toyoty. Ukhodya ot massovogo proizvodstva. Moscow: Institut kompleksnykh strategicheskikh issledovaniy, 208.
- Omelianenko, T. V. (2009). Oshchadlyve vyrobnytstvo: geneza kontseptsii y aktualizatsiia stratehii. Vcheni zapysky, 11, 133–139. Available at: http://ir.kneu.edu.ua/bitstream/2010/5908/1/133%20-%20139.pdf
- Kuzmin, О., Меlnyk, О., Іvanec, L. (2011). Diagnostics in system of process-structure management. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu «Lvivska politekhnika», 417, 9–14 Available at: http://ena.lp.edu.ua/bitstream/ntb/13433/1/003_D%D1%96agnostika%20v%20sistem_9_14_714.pdf
- Lukianova, V. V. (2009). Suchasnyi stan teoretychnykh osnov diahnostyky diialnosti pidpryiemstva. Visnyk Khmelnytskoho natsionalnoho universytetu, 1 (3), 56–57.
- Kryvoviaziuk, I. V., Kost, Ya. O.; Briukhovetska, N. Yu. (Ed.). (2012). Diahnostyka finansovo-hospodarskoi diialnosti promyslovoho pidpryiemstva. Donetsk-Lutsk: LNTU, 200.
- Nahirna, M. Ya. (2016). Etiolohichna diahnostyka eksportno-importnoi diialnosti pidpryiemstv. Lviv, 25.
- Borysenko, O. Ye. (2015). Diahnostyka upravlinnia resursnym zabezpechenniam vyrobnychoi diialnosti metalurhiinoho pidpryiemstva. Dnipropetrovsk, 19.
- Vynokurova, O. I. (2015). Antykryzove upravlinnia pidpryiemstvamy na zasadakh preventyvnoho diahnostuvannia. Odessa, 20.
- Pazieieva, H. M. (2017). Kompleksna diahnostyka v zabezpechenni ekonomichnoi bezpeky pidpryiemstv (na materialakh transportno-ekspedytsiinykh pidpryiemstv Ukrainy). Kyiv, 22.
- Zhukov, A. V. (2014). Metodychnyi pidkhid shchodo diahnostyky efektyvnosti vyrobnycho-hospodarskoi diialnosti pidpryiemstva. Biznes Inform, 3, 276–281.
- Kuzmin, O. Ye., Bortnikova, M. N. (2017). Formuvannia modeli diahnostuvannia rezultativ realizatsii konsaltynhovykh proektiv dlia pidpryiemstv. Biznes Inform, 11, 203–211.
- Prudnikova, I. M. (2017). Diahnostyka yakosti orhanizatsiinykh struktur upravlinnia pidpryiemstvamy. Kyiv, 22.
- Kuzmin, O., Melnyk, O., Zhuk, L. (2018). Formation of diagnostics indicator b ase of the university scientific activity system. Technology audit and production reserves, 1 (4 (39)), 9–15. doi:10.15587/2312-8372.2018.124396
- Veyder, M. (2011). Instrumenty berezhlivogo proizvodstva: Mini-rukovodstvo po vnedreniyu metodik berezhlivogo proizvodstva. Moscow: Alpina Pablisherz, 125.
- Marchwinski, C., Shook, J., Schroeder, A. (2008). Lean Lexicon a graphical glossary for Lean Thinkers. Lean Enterprise Institute, 136.
- Dailey, K. W. (2003). The Lean Manufacturing Pocket Handbook. Publishing Co., 42.
- Omelianenko, T. V., Shcherbyna, O. V., Barabas, D. O., Vakulenko, A. V. (2009). Oshchadlyve vyrobnytstvo: kontseptsiia, instrumenty, dosvid. Kyiv: KNEU, 157.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Iryna Kolos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.
