National strategic innovation security conceptualization

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2018.134242

Keywords:

strategic innovation security, national security, technological forecasting, technological dynamics, state policy

Abstract

The object of research is the strategic innovation security of the country. The need to analyze the innovative dimension of strategic security is due to the fact that narrowing national security in the military and political aspect in relation to national security and defense interests is an erroneous approach in modern conditions. Innovative security is the component linking research directions in the interests of ensuring both the military security of the country and its social and economic development.

Both classical scientific methods (analysis and synthesis, logical generalization, analogies, comparative comparison), and specific methods of the economy of high technology and innovative management are used in the research.

Conceptual bases of information and analytical support of strategic innovation security are developed, which require the development of sound and effective management solutions that integrate various sources of information and rely on a wide range of quantitative and qualitative methods with a focus on the long-term perspective. Based on the analysis of a number of foreign SSM concepts and national security analysts, a range of tasks is identified, which should be addressed within the framework of strategic innovation security analysts.

A set of indicators is identified to determine the assessment of the state of strategic innovation security. It is suggested to consider macro-indicators of strategic innovation security:

  • reflect the conformity of the national to the global innovative trends;
  • organizational and management indicators reflecting the compliance of the innovation infrastructure and the level of innovative communications within the innovation system and with the global innovation system to the requirements of new innovative and technological trends;
  • sectoral indicators of innovation security, reflecting the level of compliance of industry technologies and products with promising requirements and specific industry technological trajectories.

Due to the consideration of strategic innovation security as the leading factor of national security, it is possible to develop appropriate assessment criteria based on technological dynamics.

Author Biography

Vitaliy Omelyanenko, Sumy State Pedagogical University named after A. S. Makarenko, 87, Romenskaia str., Sumy, Ukraine, 40002

PhD

Department of Business Economics and Administration

References

  1. Workman, M. (2012). Validation of a biases model in strategic security decision making. Information Management & Computer Security, 20 (2), 52–70. doi: http://doi.org/10.1108/09685221211235599
  2. Freeman, C. (1982). The Economics of Industrial Innovation. London: Pinter, 249.
  3. Sherman, W. C. (2002). Air warfare. Air University Press. Maxwell Air Force Base. doi: http://doi.org/10.21236/ada421698
  4. Lensey, R. A. (2007). China's rise regional stabilizer or U.S. adversary? Monterey: Naval Postgraduate School.
  5. Nikolaenko, A. I. (2013). Innovation safety in the evolutional development of economic system. Bulletin of Donetsk National University. Series C. Economics and Law, 2, 110–113.
  6. Koliopoulos, C.; Denemark, R. A. (Ed.). (2010). Historical Approaches to Security. Strategic Studies. The International Studies Encyclopedia. Vol. 5. Oxford: ISA with Wiley-Blackwell, 3321–3338.
  7. Malits'kiy, B. A. (2014). Nauka, tekhnologii, innovatsii i natsional'naya bezopasnost': teoreticheskie i prikladnye aspekty. Makarov: KZHT «Sofiya», 58.
  8. Dementev, V. E. (2016). Tekhnologicheskaya neodnorodnost' proizvodstva i tsiklichnost' ekonomicheskogo razvitiya. Zhurnal ekonomicheskoi teorii, 3, 40–50.
  9. Prokopenko, O., Omelyanenko, V. (2017). Priority Selection Within National Innovation Strategy in Global Context. Economics and Business, 31 (1), 5–18. doi: http://doi.org/10.1515/eb-2017-0014
  10. Omelyanenko, V. (2016). Innovation priorities optimization in the context of national technological security ensuring. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 4, 226–234.
  11. Omelyanenko, V. A., Kudrina, O. Y., Volodin, D. V. (2017). Conceptual principles of development resources security analysis. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 2, 280–287. doi: http://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2017.2-26
  12. Omelyanenko, V. A. (2014). Analysis of Potential of International Inter-Cluster Cooperation in High-Tech Industries. International Journal of Econometrics and Financial Management, 2 (4), 141–147.
  13. Karim, H. V. (2006). Strategic Security Management. A Risk Assessment Guide for Decision Makers. CPP, CSC, 416.
  14. Munk, T. H. (2015). Cyber-security in the European Region: Anticipatory Governance and Practices. Manchester: https://www.escholar.manchester.ac.uk/jrul/search/?search=%22The%20University%20of%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20Manchester%22" target="_blank">University of Manchester, 286.
  15. Mosoiu, O., Oana, M. (2009). Evolutions and tendencies in the common European security strategy in the context of lobalization. AFASES 2009: Scientific research and education in the air force. Brasov: «Henri Coanda» Air Force Academy, 50–59.
  16. Omelyanenko, V. (2017). Analysis of conceptual aspects of institutional and technological design. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 2 (5 (40)), 31–36. doi: http://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2018.128651
  17. Omelyanenko, V. (2017). Basics of Optimization Strategy for Integrating Space Industry Technology Package Into Global Value Chains. Economics and Business, 30 (1), 113–125. doi: http://doi.org/10.1515/eb-2017-0010
  18. Omelyanenko, V. A. (2016). Basics of general approach for technological systems analysis. Advanced Information Systems and Technologies AIST-2016. Sumy, 29–30.
  19. Garwin, R. L. (2017). Strategic Security Challenges for 2017 and Beyond NAS Annual Meeting. Availailable at: https://fas.org/rlg/nas-challenges.pdf
  20. Doctorate in Strategic Security. Available at: https://henley-putnam.national.edu/programs/doctorate-strategic-security/
  21. Greaves, S., Clark, T. (2008). Strategic Security as a New Academic Discipline. Journal of Strategic Security, 1 (1), 7–20. doi: http://doi.org/10.5038/1944-0472.1.1.2
  22. Obnovlennaia Innovacionnaia strategiia OESR: vliianie na nacionalnye strategii stran. (2016). Available at: https://oecdcentre.hse.ru/news/200128013.html
  23. Erohin, V. Yu. (2013). Strategii ustoychivogo razvitiya predpriyatiy: printsipy i kriterii razrabotki. Socialno-ekonomicheskie yavleniia i process, 3 (49), 60–62.
  24. Sarkisyan, O. L. (2015). Koncept «strategichekoy kultury» kak model issledovaniy v oblasti nacionalnoy bezopasnosti. Problemy nacionalnoi bezopasnosti v usloviyah globalizacii (mezhdisciplinarnye aspekty). Er.: RAU, 5–14.

Downloads

Published

2018-01-23

How to Cite

Omelyanenko, V. (2018). National strategic innovation security conceptualization. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 3(5(41), 36–42. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2018.134242

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 5(41) (2018): Macroeconomics

Section

Problems of Macroeconomics and Socio-Economic Development: Original Research

License

Copyright (c) 2018 Vitaliy Omelyanenko

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.