Systemization of accounting and taxation approaches of commission operations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2019.168376Keywords:
business accounting, process of documentation of commission operations, commission, commission trading, commission agreementAbstract
The object of this research is the mechanism of commission operations and their management as a tool to optimize the use of financial resources of an enterprise. The problem is a number of issues related to the identification of a commission transaction, its documentation, the status of its participants (commission agent and committent), the methodology for calculating commission fees and determining pricing policies. As well as the order of reflection in accounting and reporting of the status and results of the implementation of these business transactions. In addition, they require solving the problem of taxation of commission operations under various tax systems and selected taxes.
Theoretical and empirical research methods are used, including abstraction and specification, which provided the definition of the boundaries of commission operations and procedures for their documentation. To build a system of components of a commission operation, the methods of grouping, analogy and theoretical generalization are used to organize the accounting processes of their reflection. The use of an inductive approach and modeling contributed to the development of algorithms for optimizing the taxation of commission operations. In addition, the methods of comparison, analysis and synthesis, combined with a systematic approach, made it possible to determine the method of accounting for commission operations.
As a research result, the order of accounting for commission operations of both parties to the contract specified in the work is systematized One of the ways to improve the pricing mechanism is also the abolition of the obligatory carrying out of markdown operations, as a result of which the time spent on documenting the registration and accounting process of this operation will be reduced and the interest of the committees in the intermediary services will increase. It is proposed to improve the VAT calculation in the process of carrying out commission operations. This ensures a uniform procedure for the formation of tax liabilities and tax credit of commission agents and committents, and the VAT will be paid to the budget only from commission, it allows to optimize the use of enterprise resources. Compared with the existing order, this makes it possible to optimize the contractual policy of the enterprise and the strategic planning of the enterprise’s activities.
References
- Blakyta, H. V., Hladii, I. O., Dziuba, O. M., Brovko, O. T. (2014). Bukhhalterskyi oblik v torhivli ta restorannomu hospodarstvi. Kyiv: Tsentr uchbovoi literatury, 288.
- Tkachenko, N. M. (2011). Bukhhalterskyi finansovyi oblik, opodatkuvannia i zvitnist. Kyiv: Alerta, 976.
- Bezverkhyi, K. V. (2013). Oblikovi dokumenty yak pervynna skladova oblikovo-zvitnoi informatsii pidpryiemstva. Yevropeiskyi vektor ekonomichnoho rozvytku, 1 (14), 11–18.
- Tarasova, T. O., Yanchev, A. V., Voloshyn, I. H. (2015). Pervynnyi oblik tovarnykh operatsii pidpryiemstv rozdribnoi torhivli. Kharkiv: KhDUKhT, 204.
- Drozdova, O. H. (2014). Komisiina torhivlia – spetsyfichna forma torhovelnoi diialnosti. Visnyk sotsialno-ekonomichnykh doslidzhen, 2, 56–60.
- Kuzma, Kh. V. (2016). Komisiina torhivlia: istoriia vynyknennia ta osoblyvosti. Pidpryiemnytstvo i torhivlia, 20, 117–121.
- Dziuba, O. M. (2016). Tovarni operatsii pidpryiemstva: osoblyvosti obliku z urakhuvanniam vitchyznianoho ta mizhnarodnoho dosvidu. Naukovyi visnyk Khersonskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Seriia: Ekonomichni nauky, 17 (1), 134–137.
- Iargutova, V. Iu., Kudakova, K. S. (2019). Osobennosti buhgalterskogo ucheta operaciy po dogovoru porucheniia. Sibirskiy ekonomicheskiy zhurnal, 2.
- Li, B., Zhao, C., Ji, Y., Bai, J. (2011). Study of moral hazard management in accounting intermediary organizations. 2011 International Conference on E-Business and E-Government (ICEE). doi: http://doi.org/10.1109/icebeg.2011.5882677
- Brunner, L. (2016). The Liability of an Online Intermediary for Third Party Content: The Watchdog Becomes the Monitor: Intermediary Liability after Delfi v Estonia. Human Rights Law Review, 16 (1), 163–174. doi: http://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngv048
- Julià-Barceló, R., Koelman, K. J. (2000). Intermediary liability: intermediary liability in the e-commerce directive: so far so good, but it’s not enough. Computer Law & Security Review, 16 (4), 231–239. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/s0267-3649(00)89129-3
- Koriahin, M. V., Kutsyk, P. O. (2015). Kontseptualnyi rozvytok metodolohii bukhhalterskoho obliku. Lviv: LKA, 239.
- Podatkovyi kodeks Ukrainy vid 02.12.2010 r. No. 2755-VI (potochna redaktsiia 01.01.2019 r., pidstava 2628-VIII) (2011). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, 13-14, 15-16, 17, 112.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Nataliia Ostapiuk, Julia Stashenko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.
