Improvement of tank for gas transportation in compressed condition and comparative evaluation criteria

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2019.170074

Keywords:

transportation of compressed natural gas, combined type tanks, criteria for the perfection of designs, tank mass, gas volume

Abstract

The object of research is the design features of tanks for gas transportation in a compressed state and the criteria for their comparative evaluation. One of the most problematic places is the lack of a unified approach to the non-economic evaluation of the efficiency of transportation of compressed gas in high-pressure tanks. The issue is of particular importance in the conditions of gas transportation by sea and, in particular, produced on the shelf. This is due to the diversity of tank designs offered by manufacturers, characterized by different working pressures and design. To create the possibility of evaluation of the mass-dimensional perfection of high-pressure tanks, an analysis of the structures suitable for the formation of the cargo systems of marine vehicles, and the criteria for their comparative evaluation has been carried out. Also the design of multi-cavity high-pressure tanks of increased working tank is proposed. They consist of steel and fiberglass pipes and special connections with plug-in retaining elements. Considering that it is common to use normal cubic meters for gas metering, a new universal criterion is proposed for comparative evaluation of their perfection. It is determined by the ratio of the mass of the tank to the volume of gas transported in it to normal conditions. The criterion establishes the relationship between the amount of gas transported and the main parameter of the tanks, taking into account their inclusion in the freight systems of vehicles. According to the specified criterion, multi-cavity tanks are competitive in terms of their performance in the form of a lengthy design, limited by the parameters of the marine vehicle. Due to the universality of the proposed criterion, it is possible for manufacturers of high pressure vessels to use them in promoting products in various industries. For the perception of the new criterion by consumers, it is necessary to conduct its comparative analysis with the criteria used today for evaluation of perfection for tanks of various types and parameters.

Author Biographies

Andriy Dzhus, Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas, 15, Carpatska str., Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine, 76019

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor

Department of Oil and Gas Machines and Equipment

 

Andriy Yurych, Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas, 15, Carpatska str., Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine, 76019

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Oil and Gas Well Drilling Engineering

References

  1. About. KGTM Kelley GasTransportModules. Available at: http://kelleygtm.com/about/
  2. Stephen, G., Cano, G. (2006). CNG marine transport – demonstration project development. Presented at the Offshore Technology Conference. Houston. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4043/17780-ms
  3. EnerSea Transport Inc. Available at: http://enersea.com
  4. Global Energy Ventures Ltd. Available at: https://gev.com
  5. TransCanada Pipeline Ltd. Available at: https://www.tcenergy.com/
  6. TITAN® Specifications. Hexagon. Available at: http://www.hexagonlincoln.com/mobile-pipeline/titan/titan-specifications#
  7. Paton, B. Ye., Kryzhanivskyi, Ye. I., Savytskyi, M. M., Shvydkyi, E. A., Zaitsev, V. V., Mandryk, O. M. (2012). Pat. No. 67664 UA. Method for transportation of compressed natural gas by a movable pipeline. MPK: F17C 5/00. No. u201114580; declareted: 08.12.2011; published: 27.02.2012, Bul. No. 4. Available at: http://uapatents.com/2-67664-sposib-transportuvannya-stisnutogo-prirodnogo-gazu-rukhomim-truboprovodom.html
  8. Petrov, V. A., Petrov, A. V., Petrov, A. V. (2002). Pat. No. 2178113 C2 RU. Rezervuar mnogopolostnii dlia transportirovki i khraneniia szhatykh gazov «PRETTI». MPK: F17C1/00. No. 98107129/12; declareted: 14.04.1998; published: 10.01.2002. Available at: https://findpatent.ru/patent/217/2178113.html
  9. Blynkov, A. N., Vlasov, A. A., Lytsys, A. V., Shurpiak, V. K. (2007). CNG – novaia tekhnolohyia morskoi transportyrovky haza: sostoianye, perspektyvy, problemy. Rossiiskii morskoi registr sudohodstva, 30, 127–162.
  10. Trudgeon, M. (2005). An Overview of NGV Cylinder Safety Standards, production and in-Service Requirements. Available at: https://apvgn.pt/wp-content/uploads/overview_of_ngv_cylinder_safety_standards.pdf
  11. Komkov, M. A., Tarasov, V. A., Zarubyna, O. V. (2012). Analyz konstruktyvno-massovoho sovershenstva obolochek sosudov davlenyia. Mashynostroenye, 3, 11–18.
  12. Dzhus, A. P. (2016). Zasoby dlia transportuvannia stysnutoho pryrodnoho hazu ta kryterii otsinky yikh doskonalosti. Mashyny, obladnannia i materialy dlia naroshchuvannia vitchyznianoho vydobutku ta dyversyfikatsii postachannia nafty i hazu. Ivano-Frankivsk, 224–228.
  13. Wavistrong Installation Guide for GRE Pipe Systems. (2013). Available at: http://www.futurepipe.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Wavistrong-Installation-Guide.pdf
  14. McNamara, J. F., Connolly, A., Steen, J. (2000). High Pressure Composite Pipeline and Joints for Gas Distribution Network. Proceedings of the 3rd International Pipeline Technology Conference. Brugge, 681–694.
  15. Practice for Obtaining Hydrostatic or Pressure Design Basis for Fiberglass (Glass-Fiber-Reinforced Thermosetting-Resin) Pipe and Fittings. ASTM International. doi: http://doi.org/10.1520/d2992-06
  16. DNAOP 0.00-1.07-94. Pravyla budovy i bezpechnoi ekspluatatsii posudyn, shcho pratsiuiut pid tyskom (1994). Zatverdzheni nakazom Derzhnahliadokhoronpratsi Ukrainy No. 104. 18.10.1994. URL: https://dnaop.com/html/88/doc-%D0%9D%D0%9F%D0%90%D0%9E%D0%9F_0.00-1.07-94
  17. Pysarenko, H. V. (Ed.) (1979). Soprotyvlenye materyalov. Kyiv: Vyshcha shkola, 696.
  18. Savytskyi, M. M., Savytskyi, O. M., Suprunenko, V. O., Zaitsev, V. V. (2013). Determination of internal circuit keels parameters of flexible skirt of amphibious hovercraft vessel. NUS Journal. Electronic Editon, 1. Available at: http://evn.nuos.edu.ua/article/view/19553/17209

Published

2018-12-31

How to Cite

Dzhus, A., & Yurych, A. (2018). Improvement of tank for gas transportation in compressed condition and comparative evaluation criteria. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 2(1(46), 4–8. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2019.170074

Issue

Section

Mechanical Engineering Technology: Original Research