Decision making on the direction of investment in the development of separate parameters of agricultural equipment

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2020.198866

Keywords:

agribusiness, agricultural engineering, market segments, financing, product competitiveness, quality indicators

Abstract

The object of research is the process of self-financing, as a leading direction in the system of investment support for the development of business entities. One of the most problematic places in resolving this issue is prioritizing these investments.

During the study, the statistical method is used to analyze and summarize statistical information and the methods of cluster analysis and k-means to classify the main groups of indicators of technical and operational and economic and marketing parameters for the use of agricultural machinery. As well as methods of matrix analysis and multidimensional spaces – for the positioning of enterprises and the rationale for the choice of investment areas.

The paper proposes theoretical and methodological principles and conclusions, which together solve an important practical problem – the need to search for areas of investment in the development of individual parameters of agricultural machinery. The analysis of the state and characteristics of the activities of agricultural engineering enterprises of Ukraine is made. The necessity of breakthrough development of the machine-building sector of the agro-industrial complex is emphasized. It is noted that most of the Ukrainian enterprises producing agricultural machinery have outdated equipment, so they need re-equipment and significant financial injections. When classifying the priority areas of investment, it is found that agricultural machinery, which is now produced by Ukrainian engineering enterprises, needs to be completely changed. Therefore, a list of stages for the selection of areas for improving tractor equipment is proposed. The proposed approach to determining the priority of investing provides for the classification of quality indicators according to the priority of their improvement according to a certain algorithm. The investment areas are evaluated and it is established that the final decision on investing in the development of certain parameters of agricultural machinery can be made by improving only those indicators of a certain group that were obtained using clustering.

Due to the simplicity of the proposed approach, it can be applied not only for agricultural engineering, but also for other enterprises of the economic complex of Ukraine. Compared with similar well-known approaches, its use will allow more accurate research and obtain the necessary data for targeted investment in the face of limited funds.

Author Biographies

Olena Kitchenko, National Technical University «Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute», 2, Kyrpychova str., Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61002

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Economics and Marketing

Svitlana Kuchina, National Technical University «Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute», 2, Kyrpychova str., Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61002

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Economics and Marketing

References

  1. Stutzman, S. A. (2018). Differences across farm typologies in capital investment during 1996-2013. Agricultural Finance Review, 78 (1), 41–64. doi: http://doi.org/10.1108/afr-01-2017-0002
  2. Beshun, O., Achkevych, V., Chuba, S. (2018). Analysis of the development sectors of agricultural machinery agricultural machinery. Pratsi Tavriiskoho Derzhavnoho Ahrotekhnolohichnoho Universytetu, 18 (2), 237–246. doi: http://doi.org/10.31388/2078-0877-18-2-237-246
  3. Duan, Y. P., Pan, H., Zhang, Y., Li, T. H. (2014). Research on the Investment Management of Agricultural Machinery Based SPSS. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 687-691, 5177–5180. doi: http://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.687-691.5177
  4. Wieliczko, B. (2015). Investment in machinery, equipment and means of transport in Polish agriculture, 2009-2012: example of FADN region 785 (Pomorze i Mazury). Studies in Agricultural Economics, 117 (1), 43–49. doi: http://doi.org/10.7896/j.1506
  5. Lisa, S., Perrine, T., Jacky, M., James, O. (2013). Impacts of Fiscal Reforms on Country Attractiveness. Investment Claims. doi: http://doi.org/10.1093/law-iic/9780199983025.016.0008
  6. C. Hadrich, J., Larsen, R., E. Olson, F. (2013). Impact of the Section 179 tax deduction on machinery investment. Agricultural Finance Review, 73 (3), 458–468. doi: http://doi.org/10.1108/afr-07-2012-0035
  7. Myniv, R. M. (2019). Methodical approaches to the assessment of investment attractiveness of agricultural enterprises. Scientific Messenger of LNU of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies, 21 (93), 63–69. doi: http://doi.org/10.32718/nvlvet-e9313
  8. Vinichenko, I., Shutko, T. (2019). The matrix model for assessing the investment attractiveness of agricultural enterprises. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 5 (3), 9. doi: http://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2019-5-3-9-16
  9. Kolesnik, Y., Dobrovolska, O., Malyuta, I., Petrova, A., Shulyak, S. (2019). The investment model of fixed assets renovation in the agricultural industry: case of Ukraine. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 16 (4), 229–239. doi: http://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.16(4).2019.20
  10. Akram, N., Akram, M. W., Hongshu, W. (2020). Study on the Socioeconomic Factors Affecting Adoption of Agricultural Machinery. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 11 (3). doi: http://doi.org/10.7176/jesd/11-3-07
  11. Galizia, F. (2017). The Equity-Financed Enterprise: Sharing Uncertainty to Support Investment. doi: http://doi.org/10.18235/0000693
  12. Iz ystoryy otechestvennoho traktorostroenyia. Available at: http://www.avtomash.ru/katalog/histori/muzei_t/index.html
  13. Naumenko, V. O., Naumenko, I. V. (2013). Otsinka suchasnoho stanu zabezpechenosti silskohospodarskykh pidpryiemstv Kharkivskoi oblasti materialno-tekhnichnymy resursamy. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho ahrarnoho universytetu im. V.V. Dokuchaieva. Seriia: Ekonomichni nauky, 6, 139–145.
  14. Verner, I. Ye. (Ed.) (2018). Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrainy. Ukraina u tsyfrakh u 2017 rotsi statystychnyi zbirnyk. Kyiv: Vyd-vo «Konsultant», 240.
  15. Stepanushko, L. (2018). Kruhoobih tekhniky. Available at: https://www.pressreader.com/ukraine/landlord/20180131/281578061254179
  16. 5 novyn u sferi ahropromyslovoï tekhniky v Ukraiini (2017). Baker Tilly. Available at: http://www.bakertilly.ua/news/id1228
  17. Hrytsyshyn, M., Perepelytsia, N. (2017). Rynok traktoriv v Ukraini. Propozytsiia. Suchasna tekhnika dlia suchasnoho ahrariia, 4–6.
  18. Radchenko, O. D. (2017). Mekhanizm ta instrumenty pidtrymky silskoho hospodarstva zghidno z biudzhetom na 2017 rik. Ahrobiznes sohodni. Available at: http://agro-business.com.ua/agro/pytannia-bukhhalterii/item/1774-mekhanizm-ta-instrumenty-pidtrymky-silskoho-hospodarstva-zhidno-z-biudzhetom-na-2017-rik.html
  19. GOST 4.40-84. Traktory sel'skohozyajstvennye. Nomenklatura pokazatelei. Vved. 13.01.1984 (1984). Moscow: Izd-vo standartov, 8.
  20. GOST 4.373-85. Traktory promyshlennye i lesopromyshlennye. Nomenklatura pokazatelij. Vved. 19.12.1985 (1986). Moscow: Izd-vo standartov, 11.
  21. GOST 27155-86. Traktory sel'skohozyajstvennye i lesohozyajstvennye. Terminy i opredeleniya vidov. Vved. 01.07.1987 (1987). Moscow: Izd-vo standartov, 3.
  22. Borovikov. V. P. (2001). Programma STATISTICA dlya studentov i inzhenerov. Moscow: Komp'yuter-Press, 302.

Published

2019-12-24

How to Cite

Kitchenko, O., & Kuchina, S. (2019). Decision making on the direction of investment in the development of separate parameters of agricultural equipment. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 1(4(51), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2020.198866

Issue

Section

Economics and Enterprise Management: Original Research