Analysis of some models of entrepreneurship formation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2020.208941

Keywords:

entrepreneurship theory, entrepreneurship formation, continuous global phenomenon, type of activity, law of force, preferences.

Abstract

The object of research is the process of entrepreneurship formation. The work considered some theoretical foundations of this process, the functioning of entrepreneurship itself as a systemic global phenomenon and as a type of activity. The research methodology is based on theoretical and methodological analysis of scientific literature, comparison of various theories of entrepreneurship and observations of the activities of various entrepreneurs. Description, analysis and modeling, and a combinatorial-logical approach are also applied to building formal models of the functioning of entrepreneurship as a systemic global phenomenon and as a separate type of activity. The results of this study show that entrepreneurship is a systemic global phenomenon characterized by a combination of productive forces and industrial relations, the task of which is to achieve a specific goal, and in turn, entrepreneurship is also a type of activity. In its activities, entrepreneurship depends on the influence of factors and preferences that it has. Various factors, in their specific situation, create boundaries beyond which the development of entrepreneurship should not go, but at the same time preferences create separate advantages, benefits or other benefits that arise in comparison with other factors. If in the process of entrepreneurial activity all factors and preferences are equally valid, then the enterprise develops harmoniously. But, if one of the factors gains more strength, while others lose it, a monopoly arises, which leads to the development of entrepreneurship in the direction of a political, institutional, social or economic direction. In the competition of factors and preferences, the law of force constantly works, according to which one of the factors or preferences always has the greatest influence, while reducing the influence of others. The practical significance of the research lies in the fact that its results can be used as a reference material for entrepreneurship researchers or entrepreneurs themselves to assess their own situation and prospects.

Author Biography

Vitalii Ivanchenko, M. P. Shulgin State Road Research Institute State Enterprise, 57, Peremohy ave., Kyiv, Ukraine, 03113

PhD, Associate Professor

References

  1. Cassis, Y., Minoglou, I. (2005). Entrepreneurship in theory and history: State of the art and new perspectives. Entrepreneurship in theory and history. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 3–21. doi: http://doi.org/10.1057/9780230522633_1
  2. Knight, F. H. (2014). Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Martino Fine Books, 394.
  3. Laplume, A., Yeganegi, S. (2009). Entrepreneurship Theories. Spring. Available at: https://www.entrepreneurshiptheories.com/about/
  4. Davidsson, P.; Katz, J., Shepherd, S. (Eds.) (2003). The Domain of Entrepreneurship Research: Some suggestions. Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth, 6, 315–372. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/s1074-7540(03)06010-0
  5. Mcconnell, C. R., Brue, S. L., Flynn, S. M. (2009). Economics: Principles, problems, and policies. Boston: McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 917.
  6. Fedorenko, V. H., Nikolenko, Yu. V., Didenko, O. M., Denysenko, M. P., Ruzhenskyi, M. M. (2007). Osnovy ekonomichnoi teorii. Kyiv: Alerta, 519.
  7. Halchynskyi, A. S., Yeshchenko, P. S., Palkin, Yu. I. (1995). Osnovy ekonomichnoi teorii. Kyiv: Vyshcha shkola, 471.
  8. Kirzner, I. M. (1999). Creativity and/or alertness: A reconsideration of the Schumpeterian entrepreneur. The review of Austrian economics, 11 (1-2), 5–17. doi: http://doi.org/10.1023/a:1007719905868
  9. Schumpeter, J. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper and Roe Publishers, 82.
  10. Baumol, W. J. (1968). Entrepreneurship in economic theory. The American economic review, 58 (2), 64–71.
  11. Baumol, W. J. (1996). Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive, and destructive. Journal of Business Venturing, 11 (1), 3–22. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(94)00014-x
  12. Mayer, C., Baumol, W. J. (1996). Entrepreneurship, Management, and the Structure of Payoffs. The Economic Journal, 106 (434), 219. doi: http://doi.org/10.2307/2234945

Downloads

Published

2020-08-31

How to Cite

Ivanchenko, V. (2020). Analysis of some models of entrepreneurship formation. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 4(4(54), 30–33. https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2020.208941

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 4(54) (2020): Economics of enterprises. Macroeconomics

Section

Reports on research projects

License

Copyright (c) 2020 Vitalii Ivanchenko

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.