Development of the combined approach to the valuation of intellectual property objects

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2022.253472

Keywords:

industrial property, valuation of intellectual property, combined approach to valuation

Abstract

The object of this research is a combined approach to the valuation of intellectual property. The paper compares the traditional approaches to valuation: profitable, market and cost, and identified the shortcomings of each. During the work the methods of analysis and synthesis of scientific literature were used to highlight the disadvantages and advantages of traditional approaches, statistical and comparative methods for estimating the value of patents in one industry. Mathematical modeling was also used to develop the formula of the combined approach. Researchers raised the issue of determining the pricing factors that are taken into account when determining the calculation parameters and dependent coefficients of adjustment of the value of intellectual property. Researchers presented methodological recommendations for calculating the integrated coefficient of influence of qualitative and quantitative factors, taking into account the type of object and the features of standardized approaches to evaluation.

As a result of the analysis of approaches the improvement of the combined approach for definition of cost of object of intellectual property is offered. The development takes into account the purpose of the assessment and the availability of complete, reliable and objective information, as well as the affiliation of the intellectual property to a particular industry and the impact of technological development of this industry. On the basis of the proposed coefficients of adjustment of the value of intellectual property objects, the value of industrial property according to the patent of Ukraine UA85101 and some inventions of the power engineering industry of enterprises of Kharkiv region (Ukraine) was calculated. The best result for the patent owner of JSC «Ukrainian Energy Machines» are the calculations obtained on the basis of the combined approach, taking into account the traditional profit approach and the integrated coefficient. According to the studied model, the value of industrial property UA85101 is 26930 USD. These calculations assume the best economic effect of using the rights to this patent in the company, or obtaining income from the sale of a license for this patent using a lump sum or royalty. The practical applicability of the study allows industrial enterprises to assess the possibility of improving the efficiency of intellectual property management, which provides maximum benefit from the commercialization of innovations.

Author Biography

Nataliia Svishchova, National Technical University «Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute»

Postgraduate Student, Assistant

Department of Business Economics and International Economic Relations

References

  1. Orliuk, O. P., Butnik-Siverskyi, O. B., Fedchenko, L. Yu., Androshchuk, H. O. et. al. (2011). Teoretychni ta metodychni zasady otsinky vartosti intelektualnoi vlasnosti. Kyiv: TOV «Lazuryt-Polihraf», 726.
  2. Ksenofontova, M. M. (2014). Intelektualna vlasnist: u skhemakh i tablytsiakh. Sumy: Vyd-vo SumDPU imeni A. S. Makarenka, 292.
  3. Kato, M., Onishi, K., Honjo, Y. (2021). Does patenting always help new firm survival? Understanding heterogeneity among exit routes. Small Business Economics. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00481-w
  4. 엄성희, Dek, C. Y. (2016). A Study on the direction of patent valuation of IP financial. Dankook Law Riview, 40 (2), 329–352. doi: http://doi.org/10.17252/dlr.2016.40.2.013
  5. Butnik-Siverskyi, O. (2020). Theoretical and methodical problems of the development of the valuation of intellectual property rights. Theory and Practice of Intellectual Property, 2, 55–70. doi: http://doi.org/10.33731/22020.208278
  6. Elokhova, I. V., Nazarova, L. A. (2012). Otsenka intellektualnoi sobstvennosti kak faktor povysheniia stoimosti innovatsionnogo predpriiatiia. Vestnik PGU. Seriia: Ekonomika, 1, 93–101.
  7. Lekarkina, N. K. (2017). Primenenie metodov dokhodnogo podkhoda dlia otsenki intellektualnoi sobstvennosti. Otsenka investitsii, 1, 21–34.
  8. Larchenko, A. P. (2008). Otsenka biznesa. Podkhody i metody. Saint Petersburg: RIATeash, 59.
  9. Poltorak, A. I., Lerner, P. J. (2004). Essentials of Licensing Intellectual Property. Front Cover. Law John Wiley & Sons, 236.
  10. Tkachov, M. M., Vydria, Ye. V., Pererva, P. H. (2021). Tendentsii zhyttievoho tsyklu innovatsii. Upravlinska diialnist: dosvid, tendentsii ta perspektyvy. Kharkiv: KhNUBA, 122–124.
  11. Svishchova, N., Pererva, P. (2021). Development of approaches to the valuation of intellectual property objects influenced by Industry 4.0. International Marketing and Management of Innovations: Global Sci, 6, 10.
  12. Rudyka, V. I., Pererva, P. H.; Doroshenko, O. F. et. al. (Eds.) (2021). Teoretyko-metodolohichna sutnist transferu intelektualno-innovatsiinykh tekhnolohii. Pytannia intelektualnoi vlasnosti u sferi transferu tekhnolohii. Kyiv: NDIIV NAPrN Ukrainy, 243–249.
  13. Myroshnyk, T. O., Pererva, P. H.; Orliuk, O. P. (Ed.) (2021). Kumuliatyvnyi pidkhid do vartisnoi otsinky obiektiv intelektualnoi vlasnosti. Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy u sferi intelektualnoi vlasnosti ta yoho pravozastosuvannia: natsionalni, yevropeiski ta mizhnarodni vymiry. Kyiv: Kyiv. nats. un-t im. T. Shevchenka, 243–248.
  14. Pererva, P. H., Maslak, O. I., Kobielieva, T. O., Kuchynskyi, V. A., Illiashenko, S. M. (2021). Efficiency of information technologies in intellectual property management of industrial enterprise. Bulletin of the National Technical University «KhPI», 1, 53–58.
  15. Urazova, N. G. (2014). Osnovnye podkhody k otsenke obektov intellektualnoi sobstvennosti. Vestnik IrGTU, 12 (95), 375–382.
  16. Tkachov, M. M., Pererva, P. H., Prykhodko, Ye. H. (2020). Ekonomichni problemy pravovlasnykiv vykliuchnykh prav. Problemy ta perspektyvy rozvytku suchasnoi nauky. Ch. 1. Rivne: Nats. un-t vod. hosp-va ta pryrodokorystuvannia, 519–522.
  17. Besprozvannykh, O. O., Pererva, P. H. (2020). Osoblyvosti finansuvannia vytrat na innovatsii. Upravlinska diialnist: dosvid, tendentsii ta perspektyvy. Kharkiv: KhNUBA, 8–10.
  18. Pererva, P. H., Kosenko, O. P., Tkachov, M. M. (2014). Rozvytok metodiv vartisnoi otsinky nematerialnykh aktyviv ta obiektiv intelektualnoi vlasnosti. Nauchnie trudy DonNTU. Seryia ekonomycheskaia, 4, 57–66.
  19. Rodionova, E. M. (2009). Kompleksnaia otsenka kommercheskogo potentsiala innovatsionnogo produkta vuza. Vestnik Cheliabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika, 19 (157), 147–155.
  20. JSC «Ukrainian Energy Machines». Available at: https://ukrenergymachines.com/
  21. HELZ. Available at: https://helz.ua/
  22. JSC «Electrotyazhmash». Available at: http://spetm.com.ua/index.php/ua/
  23. YouControl – povne dosie na kozhnu kompaniiu Ukrainy. Available at: https://youcontrol.com.ua

Downloads

Published

2022-02-28

How to Cite

Svishchova, N. (2022). Development of the combined approach to the valuation of intellectual property objects. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 1(4(63), 16–23. https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2022.253472

Issue

Section

Economics and Enterprise Management: Reports on Research Projects