Reproduction management of soil fertility for innovative approach in agromelioration of Ukraine

Authors

  • Yevhenii Ulko State Biotechnological University; National Scientific Center «Institute for Soil Science and Agrochemistry Research named after O. N. Sokolovsky», Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1626-410X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2022.265575

Keywords:

Monte Carlo method, managing the reproduction of soil fertility, innovation in the branch of agromelioration, ecological and economic effect

Abstract

The object of research is managing reproduction of soil fertility using innovations in the field of agromelioration. One of the most problematic places is actualization the role and impact of innovations in agromelioration to ensure their effective management for the reproduction of soil fertility, increase land productivity and the sustainability of their use. Issues that raise in research are essential for the agricultural economy, but not always achieve goals for this reason, including natural and climatic factors. The set of such causes is not always possible to predict and to consider it especially at macro level.

In the course of the study, the modeling approaches of the economic processes in land agromelioration on the basis of widespread use of random numbers (Monte Carlo), according to the received series production studies of changes in crop yields by crop rotation. Separately were used methods the Economic and Statistical – with the determination of the processes of validization and evaluation of the obtained results, Balance – when calculating the indicators of aggregated states, Planned and Calculated according to the development of targets and measurement of economic and ecological effects, etc.

The results of the studies allow general condition of land resources in which there is a need for agromelioration measures due to disturbance of the soil environment and deviation of the pH value from the permissible level. It’s noted that in Ukraine due to the existing unbalanced land use there is a further acidification of soils, at the same time there are significant areas of land that need desalination and/or desalinization. We carried out an in-depth analysis and substantiation of the transition to innovations in land agromelioration technologies, which are not inferior to the best world standards and are modern resource-saving due to the use of land agromelioration. The ecological and economic efficiency of the use of calcium-iron sludge (CIS) in relation to the desalination action in comparison with other agromelioration measures is revealed. We proposed to improve scientific and methodological approaches to estimation the effectiveness of management the reproduction of soil fertility by randomness (uncertainty) conditions the based on production approbation, using a variety of agromeliorative techniques (variances).

Author Biography

Yevhenii Ulko, State Biotechnological University; National Scientific Center «Institute for Soil Science and Agrochemistry Research named after O. N. Sokolovsky»

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Economics and Business

Senior Scientific Researcher

Department of Innovative Economics, External Relations and Informatization of Scientific Research

References

  1. Khvesyk, M. A. (2007). Instytutsionalna model pryrodokorystuvannia: postradianskyi format. Kyiv: Kondor, 788.
  2. Shkuratov, O. (2018). Assessment of influence of environmental factors on economic indexes of agrarian production. Visnyk Agrarnoi Nauky, 96 (3), 51–55. doi: https://doi.org/10.31073/agrovisnyk201803-09
  3. Vorotyntseva, L. I. (2019). Naukovi osnovy staloho upravlinnia gruntovymy resursamy Stepu Ukrainy v umovakh zroshennia. Kharkiv, 517.
  4. Vozhehova, R. A. (2017). Stratehiia rozvytku system zemlerobstva Pivdennoho Stepu do zmin rehionalnoho klimatu. Zroshuvane zemlerobstvo, 68, 5–9.
  5. Water for a sustainable World (2015). The United Nations World Water Development Report, 140. Available at: https://catalogue.unccd.int/597_231823E.pdf
  6. Zhou, J., Cheng, G., Li, X., Hu, B. X., Wang, G. (2012). Numerical Modeling of Wheat Irrigation using Coupled HYDRUS and WOFOST Models. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 76 (2), 648–662. doi: https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2010.0467
  7. Hospodarenko, H. M. (2010). Ahrokhimiia. Kyiv, 410.
  8. Yatsuk, I. R. (Ed.). (2018). Periodychna dopovid pro stan gruntiv na zemliakh silskohospodarskoho pryznachennia Ukrainy. Pidhotovleno za rezultatamy Kh turu (2011–2015 rr.) ahrokhimichnoho obstezhennia zemel silskohospodarskoho pryznachennia. Kyiv.
  9. Kucher, A. V., Anisimova, O. V., Ulko, Ye. M.; Kucher, A. V. (Ed.) (2017). Efektyvnist innovatsii dlia ratsionalnoho vykorystannia gruntiv: teoriia, metodyka, analiz. Kharkiv: FOP Brovin O.V., 275.
  10. Baliuk, S. A., Truskavetskyi, R. S. (2018). Modeli systemnoho upravlinnia potentsialom rodiuchosti gruntiv (na prykladi Kharkivskoi i Volynskoi oblastei). Kharkiv: Stylna typohrafiia, 116.
  11. Baliuk, S. A., Kucher, A. V. (Eds.) (2018). SWOT-analiz systemy okhorony gruntiv i normatyvno-pravove zabezpechennia rehuliuvannia vidtvorennia rodiuchosti. Kharkiv: FOP Brovin O. V., 44.
  12. Baliuk, S. A., Truskavetskyi, R. S., Tsapko, Yu. L. (Eds.) (2012). Khimichna melioratsiia gruntiv (kontseptsiia innovatsiinoho rozvytku). Kharkiv: Miskdruk, 129.
  13. Tsapko, Yu. L. (2017). Innovative Technologies of Local Soil Amelioration Needs Proper Technical Equipment. Inzheneriia pryrodokorystuvannia, 1 (7), 54–57. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Iprk_2017_1_11
  14. Baliuk, S., Medvedev, V., Miroshnichenko, M., Skrylnik, Ye., Timchenko, D., Fatieev, A., Khristenko, A., Tsapko, Yu. (2012). Environmental state of soils in Ukraine. Ukrainskyi heohrafichnyi zhurnal, 2, 38–42. Available at: https://ukrgeojournal.org.ua/sites/default/files/UGJ-2012-2-38_0.pdf
  15. Baliuk, S., Medvediev, V., Vorotyntseva, L., Shymel’, V. (2017). Productivity of grain of early hybrids of corn of different strain changings. Visnyk Agrarnoi Nauky, 35 (8), 5–11. doi: https://doi.org/10.31073/agrovisnyk201708-01
  16. Kucher, A. V., Ulko, Ye. M., Anisimova, O. V.; Kucher, A. V. (Ed.) (2021). Naukovo-metodolohichni zasady vyznachennia ekonomichnoi efektyvnosti zastosuvannia innovatsii u sferi okhorony y ratsionalnoho vykorystannia gruntovykh resursiv. Kharkiv: FOP Brovin O. V., 312.
  17. Ulko, Ye. M. (2019). Evaluation of economic efficiency of innovations in organic agriculture. Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, 5 (3), 118–141. doi: https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.293989
  18. Vorotyntseva, L. (2018). Scientific and methodological approaches to the sustainable management of soil resources of the Steppe of Ukraine in irrigation. Visnyk Agrarnoi Nauky, 96 (12), 71–77. doi: https://doi.org/10.31073/agrovisnyk201812-11
  19. Lobell, D. B., Cassman, K. G., Field, C. B. (2009). Crop Yield Gaps: Their Importance, Magnitudes, and Causes. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 34 (1), 179–204. doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.environ.041008.093740
  20. Raychaudhuri, S. (2008). Introduction to Monte Carlo simulation. 2008 Winter Simulation Conference. Miami. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/wsc.2008.4736059
  21. Aderibigbe, A., Samuel, I., Adetokun, B., Tobi, S. (2017). Monte Carlo Simulation Approach to Soil Layer Resistivity Modelling for Grounding System Design. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 12, 13759–13766. Available at: https://www.ripublication.com/ijaer17/ijaerv12n23_94.pdf
  22. Bukvić, I. B. (2019). Significance of Monte Carlo Simulation in Prediction of Economic Projections: A Critical Review. 38th International Scientific Conference on Economic and Social Development. Rabat, 221–230.
  23. Brandimarte, P.; Tsay, R. S. (Ed.) (2014). Handbook in Monte Carlo simulation: applications in financial engineering, risk management, and economics. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, 688. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118593264
  24. Kucher, A. V., Anisimova, O. V., Ulko, Ye. M.; Baliuk, S. A. (Ed.) (2020). Metodolohiia otsiniuvannia ekonomichnoi efektyvnosti melioratsii gruntiv i melioratyvnykh proiektiv. Gruntovi resursy Ukrainy: prohnoz i zbalansovane vykorystannia. Kharkiv: Stylna typohrafiia, 349–387.
  25. Kucher, L., Drokin, S., Ulko, Y. (2020). Ecological-economic efficiency of irrigation projects in the context of climate change. Agricultural and Resource Economics, 6 (2), 57–77. doi: https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2020.06.02.04
  26. Shavva, K. Y. (2004). Metodyka opredelenyia taryfov na vodu, naddavaemuiu dlia oroshenyia selskokhoziaistvennikh kultur yz poverkhnostnikh vodoystochnykov. Visnyk ODABA, 13, 215–220. Available at: http://mx.ogasa.org.ua/handle/123456789/768
  27. Vorotyntseva, L. I. (2015). Application of calcium-iron production waste for irrigated by mineral waters and technologically contaminated soils improving. Ahrokhimiia i gruntoznavstvo, 83, 67–73. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/agrohimigrn_2015_83_12
  28. Ulko, Y., Kucher, A., Salkova, I., Priamukhina, N. (2019). Management of Soil Fertility Based on Improvement Methodological Approach to Evaluation of Arable Land: Case of Ukraine. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 9 (7), 1559. doi: http://doi.org/10.14505//jemt.9.7(31).18

Downloads

Published

2022-08-31

How to Cite

Ulko, Y. (2022). Reproduction management of soil fertility for innovative approach in agromelioration of Ukraine. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 4(4(66), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2022.265575

Issue

Section

Development of Productive Forces and Regional Economy: Original Research