Development of a risk management method for development projects of providers of housing and utility services

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2022.269494

Keywords:

project approach, development projects, providers of housing and utility services, anti-risk management, integrated assessment

Abstract

The object of research in the work is the processes of anti-risk management of projects for the development of providers of housing and utility services (PHUS). Particular attention is required to limit the management of the activities of the PHUS, related to the specifics of the housing and utility services sector. They have a significant impact on the need for the PHUS to constantly adjust the direction of efforts. They force companies to constantly monitor the progress of their projects and redirect resources. The priority should be development projects with the highest and fastest financial results with minimal risks. An essential lever for improving the effectiveness of anti-risk management in the projects for the development of PHUS is the possibility of adjusting the priorities for the implementation of these projects as much as possible in real time.

This study developed a method of anti-risk management of development projects for housing and utility services providers, which consists in integrating such approaches into a single process, such as the implementation of management automation and decision-making algorithms. As well as the implementation of a process approach in risk management and decision making; implementation of benchmarking; and building a dynamic organizational structure for managing development projects

The scheme of the method of anti-risk management of projects for the development of housing and utility services providers includes the following steps:

– formation of a register of projects for the development of providers of housing and utility services;

– identification of limitations of projects for the development of providers of housing and utility services;

– implementation of automation of management and algorithmization of decision-making in the management of projects for the PHUS development;

– application of a process approach in risk management and decision-making in the management of projects for the PHUS development;

– building a dynamic organizational structure for managing development projects;

– implementation of benchmarking in the management of projects for the PHUS development;

– adjusting the PHUS priorities for the implementation of development projects in real time;

– increasing the effectiveness of anti-risk management by directing the main resources to the PHUS development projects with minimal risks and the most significant economic result.

The integration of all the above blocks into the anti-risk management of PHUS development projects makes it possible to increase the efficiency of managing these projects by directing the main resources to them with minimal risks and the most significant economic result. This, in turn, will improve the performance of providers of housing and utility services in terms of increasing income and reducing costs.

Author Biographies

Yuri Chernenko, MASTERGAZ LLC

Chairman of the Board of Directors

Oksana Haidaienko, Admiral Makarov National University of Shipbuilding

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Information Management Systems and Technologies

Valentyn Tkachenko, Cherkasy State Technological University

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Electrical Systems

References

  1. Chernenko, Yu. V., Semko, I. B. (2017). Osoblyvosti upravlinnia proektamy rozvytku v inzhynirynhovykh kompaniiakh enerhorozpodilchoi haluzi. Visnyk Cherkaskoho derzhavnoho tekhnolohichnoho universytetu, 3, 52–56.
  2. Chernenko, Yu. V., Danchenko, O. B., Melenchuk, V. M. (2022). Kontseptualna model protyryzykovoho upravlinnia v proiektakh rozvytku provaideriv zhytlovo-komunalnykh posluh. Upravlinnia rozvytkom skladnykh system, 51.
  3. Chernenko, Yu. V., Danchenko, O. B., Melenchuk, V. M., Mysnyk, L. D. (2022). Models of risk management in development projects for housing and utility service providers. Applied Aspects of Information Technology, 5 (3), 208–216.
  4. Teslenko, P., Bedrii, D., Antoshchuk, S., Lytvynchenko, H. (2018). 3-Level Approach to the Projects Planning. 2018 IEEE 13th International Scientific and Technical Conference on Computer Sciences and Information Technologies (CSIT), 195–198. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/stc-csit.2018.8526643
  5. Ahmed, R., Shaheen, S., Philbin, S. P. (2022). The role of big data analytics and decision-making in achieving project success. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 65, 101697. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2022.101697
  6. Sytnyk, V. A., Teslenko, P. O., Bedrii, D. I., Sherstiuk, O. I. (2018). Upravlinnia prototypuvanniam ta ryzykamy IT-proiektiv z vidkrytym kodom. Upravlinnia proiektamy ta rozvytok vyrobnytstva, 3 (67), 116–128.
  7. Kang, B., Crilly, N., Ning, W., Kristensson, P. O. (2023). Prototyping to elicit user requirements for product development: Using head-mounted augmented reality when designing interactive devices. Design Studies, 84, 101147. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2022.101147
  8. A/B-testuvannia: shcho tse take ta chomu vam varto yoho vykorystovuvaty (2022). HOSTiQ.ua. Available at: https://hostiq.ua/blog/ukr/ab-testing/ Last accessed: 20.11.2022
  9. Perevireno na liudiakh, abo yak i dlia choho pochynaty A/B-testuvannia (2020). DOU.ua. Available at: https://dou.ua/lenta/articles/what-is-a-b-testing/ Last accessed: 20.11.2022
  10. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) (2021). PMI.
  11. Singh, N. P., Hong, P. C. (2020). Impact of strategic and operational risk management practices on firm performance: An empirical investigation. European Management Journal, 38 (5), 723–735. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2020.03.003
  12. Seek Ali, M., Danchenko, O. (2019). Analysis of sources of risk of construction projects in the plane of value-oriented management. CEUR Workshop Proceedingsthis link is disabled, 2856, 52–55. Available at: https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2856/paper11.pdf
  13. Qiu, J., Lin, Z. (2011). A framework for exploring organizational structure in dynamic social networks. Decision Support Systems, 51 (4), 760–771. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2011.01.011
  14. Chernenko, Yu. V. (2022). Dynamichna orhstruktura upravlinnia proiektamy rozvytku provaideriv zhytlovo-komunalnykh posluh. Project, Program, Portfolio Management. Odesa: Odeska politekhnika.
  15. Мorschenok, Т. S. (2017). Benchmarking as an instrument of increase of business structures competitiveness. Ekonomika i suspilstvo, 9, 533–540.
  16. Bredael, D., Vanhoucke, M. (2022). Multi-project scheduling: A benchmark analysis of metaheuristic algorithms on various optimisation criteria and due dates. European Journal of Operational Research. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2022.11.009
  17. Bedrii, D. (2020). Development of a model of integrated risk and conflict management of scientific project stakeholders under conditions of behavioral economy. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 3 (2 (53)), 9–14. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2020.207086
  18. Prodius, I. P., Pristupa, N. F. (2012). Improvement of the organizational structure of management of the industrial enterprise. ECONOMICS: time realities, 3-4 (4-5), 17–22. Available at: http://economics.opu.ua/files/archive/2012/n4-5.html Last accessed: 11.11.2022
  19. Kozhukhivska, R. B., Parubok, N. V. (2018). Improvement of the organizational structure of management hospitality companies. Economy and Society, 17, 258–264. doi: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2018-17-37
  20. Tin, Ch. (2022). Metodyka partnerskoho benchmarkinhu pry rozrobtsi mizhnarodnykh spilnykh navchalnykh proiektiv na bazi metodolohii Agile. Upravlinnia rozvytkom skladnykh system, 50, 93–101.
Development of a risk management method for development projects of providers of housing and utility services

Downloads

Published

2022-12-21

How to Cite

Chernenko, Y., Haidaienko, O., & Tkachenko, V. (2022). Development of a risk management method for development projects of providers of housing and utility services. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 6(2(68), 22–28. https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2022.269494

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 2(68) (2022): Information and control systems

Section

Systems and Control Processes

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Yuri Chernenko, Oksana Haidaienko, Valentyn Tkachenko

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.