Mathematical modelling of industrial enterprise logistics with different options of basic information

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2014.28067

Keywords:

information system, logistics, mathematical models, compensated and an uncompensated deficit optimization

Abstract

The reasons of the low effectiveness of warehousing models with deficit and their construction are investigated and analyzed. It is not taken into account that the cost of delivery and storage, as well as penalties of shortages related to different moments in time in determining the function form of the general costs in models with a deficit The deficit size and the financial losses from its inception is incorrectly defined. The combination of these observations is one of the main factors affecting the adequacy of mathematical models of inventory management with a deficit.

Mathematical models based on the principle of incoming and outgoing financial flows reduction to one moment of time led to the following conclusions: non-compensable deficit allowing is economically inefficient; for "large" penalties from a deficit the compensated deficit allow economically inefficient; the compensated deficit is planned for"small" penalties from a deficit. The planning results differ significantly from the results obtained using the existing model.

Using the developed mathematical models will help make the best decisions in warehouse logistics. Remarks on the model construction with a deficit can be used for other models of inventory management that will create an effective information logistics system.

Author Biography

Александр Васильевич Несторенко, Berdyansk State Pedagogical University, Str. Schmidt, 4, Berdyansk, Ukraine, 71118

Associate Professor, Candidate of Economics

Department of business economics and economic theory

References

  1. Grinberg, R. S., Rubinshtein, A. Y. (2010). Teoriya, innovatsii i konturi buduschey ekonomiki v dialoge s Kennetom Errou. Voprosi ekonomiki, 10, 9–10.

    Alesinskaya, T. V. (2002). Ekonomiko-matematicheskie metody i modeli. Taganrog: Izdatelstvo TRTU, 153.

    Lotfi, V., Pegels, C. C. (1991). Decision support systems for production and operations management (DSSPOM). Boston: Richard D. Irwin, Inc., 359.

    Dzuba S. A. (2011). Upravlenie zapasami: verna li formula Wilsona? Menedzchment v Rossii i za rubezchom, 4, 3–12.

    Sterligova, A. N. (2005). O suguboi praktichnosti formuli Wilsona. Logistik & sistema, 4, 42–52.

    Sterligova, A. N. (2005). O suguboi praktichnosti formuli Wilsona. Logistik & sistema, 5, 56–61.

    Wilson, R. H. (1934). A Scientific Routine for Stock Control. Harvard Business Review, 13, 116–128.

    Tektov, D. A. (2003). Dinamicheskie I statisticheskie modeli upravleniya zapasami v roznichnoi torgovle. Sankt-Peterburzchskii gosudarstveniy universitet, 159.

    Avtonomov, V. S. (2013). Abstraktsii v ekonomicheskoy nauke. Zhurnal novoy ekonomicheskoy assotsiatsii, 1 (17), 160–162.

    Gamkrelidze, L. I., Gamkrelidze, E. L. (2009). Logistika. Teoriya i praktika. Мoscow: MGIU, 279.

    Solyanik, L. G. (2006). Optimizatsiya parametriv upravlinnya tovarno-materialnimi zapasami na promislovomu pidpriemstvi. The Economic Messenger of the NMU, 1, 16–24.

    Sterligova, A. N. (2005). Optimalniy razmer partii ili Zagadochnaya formula Wilsona. Logistik & sistema, 2, 64–69.

    Meschankin, А. (2005). Umeete li vi primenyat formulu Wilsona? Logistik & sistema, 2, 37–42.

    Lukinskiy, V. S., Tsvirinko, I. A. (2001). Varianti resheniya logisticheskoy zadachi opredeleniya optimalnogo razmera zakaza. Organizatsiya mezhdunarodnih i vnutrennih perevozok s primeneniem printsipov logistiki. SPb. : SPbGIEU, 228.

    Kotlyarova, V. G. (2010). Razrabotka modeli opredelrniya optimalnoy partii postavok v usloviyah neprepyvnogo proizvodstva (na primere koksohimicheskoy podotrasli). Ekonomika rozvitku. Kharkiv : KHNEU, 1 (53), 96–99.

    Kozhamkulova, Zh. Zh. (2012). Rozrobka modeli i metodov informatsionnoy sistemi analiza i prinyatiya resheniy v agrobiznese. Informatsionnie sistemi. Almati, 97.

    Kravchenko, V. N. (2010). Modeli protsesov upravleniya zapasami gotovoy produktsii na predpriyatii. Ekonomika i organizatsiya upravlinnya, 1 (7), 10–21.

    Mur, D., Uederford L. R. (2004). Ekonomicheskoe modelirovanie v Microsoft Excel. Мoscow: Izdatelskiy dom «Wilyams», 2021.

    Mandel, A. S. (2014). O vibore kriteriev v zadachah upravleniya zapasami v usloviyah neopredelennosti. Мoscow: IPU RAN, 4212–4218.

    Eddous, M., Stensfild, R. (1997). Metody prinyatiya reshenii. Moscow: Audit, UNITI, 590.

    Nestorenko, A. V. (2007). Alternativniy podhod k postroeniyu EOQ modeli upravleniya zapasami. Upravlinnya ekonomikoyu rekreaciynih teritoriy, galuzey i pidpriemstv. Donetsk: OOO „Yugo-Vostok, Ltd”, 270–276.

Downloads

Published

2014-10-02

How to Cite

Несторенко, А. В. (2014). Mathematical modelling of industrial enterprise logistics with different options of basic information. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 5(1(19), 69–75. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2014.28067

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 1(19) (2014): Technology audit

Section

Technology audit

License

Copyright (c) 2016 Александр Васильевич Несторенко

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.