Modeling the participant's behavior in projects of erp implementation
Keywords:behavioral theories, ERP implementation projects, games theory
This article presents an analysis of modern studies of behavioral theories that allow to find the solutions of complex problems of implementing innovative projects in organizations. The main purpose of this study is to develop the approaches to improve the effectiveness of the participant’s activities in ERP implementation projects. The "human" factor is one of the main causes of failure or low efficiency of such projects realization. People resist innovations and do not want to do extra work to get new opportunities. The methods of game theory can provide the solutions. The proposed approach allows to find optimal variants to stimulate the participants of the project, as well as to determine the conditions to create coalition of different participant’s categories to maximize of project effectiveness at minimum cost. The results can be used as a basis for the optimal solutions in the organization of ERP-systems implementation projects.
1. Maheshwari, S. P., Singh, P., Tripathi, L. K. (2011, January). ERP Implementation in Educational Institutions: Challenges and Opportunities. Eighth AIMS International Conference on Management, 1-4.
2. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman, Cambridge University Press, 273.
3. Plouffe, C. R., Hulland, J. S., Vandenbosch, M. (2001, June). Research Report: Richness Versus Parsimony in Modeling Technology Adoption Decisions—Understanding Merchant Adoption of a Smart Card-Based Payment System. Information Systems Research, Vol. 12, № 2, 208–222. doi:10.1287/isre.188.8.131.5297.
4. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. Ed. 4. New York: Free Press, 518.
5. Fichman, R. G., Kemerer, C. F. (1999, September). The Illusory Diffusion of Innovation: An Examination of Assimilation Gaps. Information Systems Research, Vol. 10, № 3, 255–275. doi:10.1287/isre.10.3.255.
6. Ajzen, I. (1991, December). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 50, № 2, 179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t.
7. Amoako-Gyampah, K., Salam, A. F. (2004, July). An extension of the technology acceptance model in an ERP implementation environment. Information & Management, Vol. 41, № 6, 731–745. doi:10.1016/j.im.2003.08.010.
8. Gefen, D. (2004). What Makes an ERP Implementation Relationship Worthwhile: Linking Trust Mechanisms and ERP Usefulness. Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 21, № 1, 263-288.
9. Lim, E. T. K., Pan, S. L., Tan, C. W. (2005, June). Managing user acceptance towards enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems – understanding the dissonance between user expectations and managerial policies. European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 14, № 2, 135–149. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000531.
10. Kahneman, D., Tversky, A. (1979, March). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, Vol. 47, № 2, 263-292. doi:10.2307/1914185.
11. Sayeed Haider Salih, Ab Razak Che Hussin, Halina Mohamed Dahlan. User Resistance Factors in Post ERP Implementation. Journal of research and innovation in information systems, 19-27. Available: http://seminar.spaceutm.edu.my/ jisri/download/F_FinalPublished/Pub19_UserResistance_PostERP.pdf.
12. Fon Neyman, J., Morgenshtern, O. (1989). Teoriya igr i ekonomicheskoe povedenie. M.: Nauka, 185.
13. Aumann, R. J. (1961, December). Almost Strictly Competitive Games. Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 9, № 4, 544–550. doi:10.1137/0109046.
14. Akerlof, G. A., Stiglitz, J. E. (1969, June). Capital, Wages and Structural Unemployment. The Economic Journal, Vol. 79, № 314, 269-281. doi:10.2307/2230168.
15. Novikov, D. A., Chhartishvili, A. G. (2004). Prikladnyie modeli informatsionnogo upravleniya. M.: IPU RAN, 129.
16. Novikov, D. A., Petrakov, S. N. (1999). Kurs teorii aktivnyih system. M.: SINTEG, 104.
17. Guoyin Jiang, Bin Hu, Youtian Wang. (2010, October 21). Agent-based simulation approach to understanding the interaction between employee behavior and dynamic tasks. SIMULATION, Vol. 87, № 5, 407–422. doi:10.1177/0037549710385745.
18. Dubina, I. N., Oskorbin, N. M. (2010). Modelirovanie povedeniya sub'ektov innovatsionnoy deyatelnosti pri razlichnyih shemah stimulirovaniya. Vestnik NGU. Seriya: Sotsialno-ekonomicheskie nauki, V. 4b, Iss. 10, 74-80.
19. Shapiro, S. A. (2005). Motivatsiya i stimulirovanie personala. M.: GrossMedia, 224.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2016 Наталия Робертовна Полуэктова
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.