Development of assessment and forecasting techniques using fuzzy cognitive maps

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2023.281892

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, analysis objects, complex technical systems, vague cognitive maps, uncertainty

Abstract

Nowadays, no state in the world is able to work on the creation and implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) in isolation from others. AI technologies are used to solve general and highly specialized tasks in various spheres of society. In the process of assessing (identifying) the state of complex objects and objects of management analysis, there is a high degree of a priori uncertainty regarding their state and a small amount of initial data describing them. At the same time, despite the huge amount of information, the degree of non-linearity, illogicality and noisy data is increasing. That is why the issue of improving the efficiency of assessing the condition of components and objects is an important issue. Thus, the objects of analysis were chosen as the research object. The subject of research is the identification and forecasting of the analysis object.

In the research, the evaluation and forecasting method was developed using fuzzy cognitive maps. The features of the proposed method are:

‒ taking into account the degree of uncertainty about the object state while calculating the correction factor;

‒ adding a correction factor for data noise as a result of distortion of information about the object state;

‒ reduction of computing costs while assessing the object state;

‒ creation of a multi-level and interconnected description of hierarchical objects;

‒ correction of the description of the object as a result of a change in its current state using a genetic algorithm;

‒ the possibility of performing calculations with source data that are different in nature and units of measurement.

It is advisable to implement the proposed method in specialized software, which is used to analyze the state of complex technical systems and while making decisions.

Author Biographies

Andrii Shyshatskyi, Taras Shevchenko Kyiv National University

PhD, Senior Researcher

Educational and Scientific Institute of Public Administration and Civil Service

Oleg Sova, Kruty Heroes Military Institute of Telecommunications and Information Technologies

Doctor of Technical Science, Professor, Head of Department

Department of Automated Control Systems

Tetiana Stasiuk, Military Institute of Telecommunications and Information Technologies named after Heroes of Kruty

Lecturer

Cyclic Commission of General Education Disciplines

Sergeant Military College

Vitalii Andronov, Research Institute of Military Intelligence

PhD, Head of Department

Oleksii Nalapko, Central Scientifically-Research Institute of Armaments and Military Equipments of the Armed Forces of Ukraine

PhD, Senior Researcher

Scientific-Research Laboratory of Automation of Scientific Researches

Nadiia Protas, Poltava State Agrarian University

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Information Systems and Technologies

Gennady Pris, Kruty Heroes Military Institute of Telecommunications and Information Technologies

Deputy Head

Scientific Center of Communication and Informatization

Roman Lazuta, Kruty Heroes Military Institute of Telecommunications and Information Technologies

Head of Department

Scientific Research Department

Scientific Center for Communication and Informatization

Illia Kovalenko, Kruty Heroes Military Institute of Telecommunications and Information Technologies

Senior Researcher

Scientific Research Department

Bohdan Kovalchuk, Kruty Heroes Military Institute of Telecommunications and Information Technologies

Junior Researcher

Scientific Research Department

References

  1. Shevchenko, A. I., Baranovskyi, S. V., Bilokobylskyi, O. V., Bodianskyi, Ye. V., Bomba, A. Ya. et al.; Shevchenko, A. I. (Ed.) (2023). Stratehiia rozvytku shtuchnoho intelektu v Ukraini. Kyiv: IPShI, 305.
  2. Shyshatskyi, A. V., Bashkyrov, O. M., Kostyna, O. M. (2015). Rozvytok intehrovanykh system zviazku ta peredachi danykh dlia potreb Zbroinykh Syl. Ozbroiennia ta viiskova tekhnika, 1 (5), 35–40.
  3. Sova, O., Shyshatskyi, A., Salnikova, O., Zhuk, O., Trotsko, O., Hrokholskyi, Y. (2021). Development of a method for assessment and forecasting of the radio electronic environment. EUREKA: Physics and Engineering, 4, 30–40. doi: https://doi.org/10.21303/2461-4262.2021.001940
  4. Shyshatskyi, A., Zvieriev, O., Salnikova, O., Demchenko, Ye., Trotsko, O., Neroznak, Ye. (2020). Complex Methods of Processing Different Data in Intellectual Systems for Decision Support System. International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering, 9 (4), 5583–5590. doi: https://doi.org/10.30534/ijatcse/2020/206942020
  5. Yeromina, N., Kurban, V., Mykus, S., Peredrii, O., Voloshchenko, O., Kosenko, V. et al. (2021). The Creation of the Database for Mobile Robots Navigation under the Conditions of Flexible Change of Flight Assignment. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, 11 (5), 37–44. doi: https://doi.org/10.46338/ijetae0521_05
  6. Rotshtejn, A. P. (1999). Intellektual'nye tekhnologii identifikacii: nechyotkie mnozhestva, geneticheskie algoritmy, nejronnye seti. Vinnica: UNIVERSUM, 320.
  7. Ramaji, I. J., Memari, A. M. (2018). Interpretation of structural analytical models from the coordination view in building information models. Automation in Construction, 90, 117–133. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.02.025
  8. Pérez-González, C. J., Colebrook, M., Roda-García, J. L., Rosa-Remedios, C. B. (2019). Developing a data analytics platform to support decision making in emergency and security management. Expert Systems with Applications, 120, 167–184. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.11.023
  9. Chen, H. (2018). Evaluation of Personalized Service Level for Library Information Management Based on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process. Procedia Computer Science, 131, 952–958. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.04.233
  10. Chan, H. K., Sun, X., Chung, S.-H. (2019). When should fuzzy analytic hierarchy process be used instead of analytic hierarchy process? Decision Support Systems, 125, 113114. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2019.113114
  11. Osman, A. M. S. (2019). A novel big data analytics framework for smart cities. Future Generation Computer Systems, 91, 620–633. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2018.06.046
  12. Gödri, I., Kardos, C., Pfeiffer, A., Váncza, J. (2019). Data analytics-based decision support workflow for high-mix low-volume production systems. CIRP Annals, 68 (1), 471–474. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2019.04.001
  13. Harding, J. L. (2013). Data quality in the integration and analysis of data from multiple sources: some research challenges. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XL-2/W1, 59–63. doi: https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-xl-2-w1-59-2013
  14. Kosko, B. (1986). Fuzzy cognitive maps. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 1, 65–75.
  15. Gorelova, G. V. (2013). Kognitivnyi podhod k imitatsionnomu modelirovaniiu slozhnyh sistem. Izvestiia IUFU. Tekhnicheskie nauki, 3, 239–250.
  16. Orouskhani, M., Orouskhani, Y., Mansouri, M., Teshnehlab, M. (2013). A Novel Cat Swarm Optimization Algorithm for Unconstrained Optimization Problems. International Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science, 5 (11), 32–41. doi: https://doi.org/10.5815/ijitcs.2013.11.04
Development of method for identifying the state of various dynamic objects

Downloads

Published

2023-06-15

How to Cite

Shyshatskyi, A., Sova, O., Stasiuk, T., Andronov, V., Nalapko, O., Protas, N., Pris, G., Lazuta, R., Kovalenko, I., & Kovalchuk, B. (2023). Development of assessment and forecasting techniques using fuzzy cognitive maps. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 3(2(71), 15–19. https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2023.281892

Issue

Section

Systems and Control Processes