Study of quality models used by logistics operators in Argentina and South America

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2023.289735

Keywords:

quality models, management systems, logistics operators, national quality awards

Abstract

This research aims to gather information on the use of Excellence models (such as the Quality Awards) by Logistics Operators in Argentina and neighboring countries. Therefore, the object of the research is the quality models used by logistics operators.

In general, these organizations, and mainly those where Logistics is their main service, have begun applying quality standards later than other types of organizations, like those in the manufacture or services industries. This is because their practice is not deemed an added-value activity by the customer.

This study found that, at the regional level, these companies are in the process of applying Quality, Environmental, Road Safety and other Management Systems from the ISO suite (ISO 9001, ISO 14001, ISO 39001, etc.), but the use of Excellence models is only present in some, mainly in Argentina-based companies. Remarkably, this behavior does not replicate in other countries of the region (Brazil, Chile, Uruguay), where the aforementioned standards are more widely applied. On the other hand, some countries have their own standards (Argentina, Brazil) for Freight activities developed by their local chambers, but these are mainly focused on the operational aspect of their activity.

In this study, information was collected regarding the methodology related to quality and excellence of 109 companies, belonging to Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia and Peru. At the regional level, the ISO 9001 management model is adopted by 68 % of the organizations studied, followed by ISO 14001 adopted by 30 % of the organizations and ISO 45001 adopted by 15 % of the organizations. Based on the conclusions of this work, there is an opportunity to create specific policy around Quality Models for this industry that will support the creation of new standards and the improvement of existing ones. This paper can serve as a starting point for analyzing the scenario in other regions within a framework of similar geographical characteristics.

Author Biographies

Lucas Kadener, Universidad Nacional de Tres de Febrero

Professor

Instituto de Ciencia y Tecnología – IcyTec

Horacio Andrés Repetto, Universidad Nacional de Tres de Febrero

Professor

Instituto de Ciencia y Tecnología – IcyTec

Ana María Lopez Libertella, Universidad Nacional de Tres de Febrero

Professor

Instituto de Ciencia y Tecnología – IcyTec

Constanza Moltedo, Universidad Nacional de Tres de Febrero

Postgraduate Student

Instituto de Ciencia y Tecnología – IcyTec

References

  1. Santandreu, J. P., García, D. S. (2004). Calidad Total y Logística. Editorial Marge Books, 160.
  2. Vázquez, R., Josefina, N. et al. (2012). Logística y calidad. Memorias. Jornada Científica de Ingeniería Industrial. México: ITSON.
  3. Ulla, L. et al. (2021). Logística sustentable en Argentina. Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires: Cámara Empresaria de Operadores Logísticos.
  4. Cambios y mirada prospectiva de las Operaciones Logísticas. Cámara Empresaria de Operadores Logísticos CEDOL (2020). Cámara Empresaria de Operadores Logísticos. Buenos Aires.
  5. Eroglu, C., Kurt, A. C., Elwakil, O. S. (2016). Stock Market Reaction to Quality, Safety, and Sustainability Awards in Logistics. Journal of Business Logistics, 37 (4), 329–345. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12145
  6. Nae, I., Severin, I. (2018). Performance management model for third party logistics companies. UPB Scientific Bulletin, Series D: Mechanical Engineering, 80, 279–286.
  7. Ghafoor, L. (2023). A Review of Study on Quality Assurance Models. OSF Preprints eg7v2. Center for Open Science. doi: https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/eg7v2
  8. Beltrán, J., Muñuzuri, J., Rivas, M. Á., Martín, E. (2010). Modelo de evaluación de la gestión logística en empresas. XIV Congreso Ingeniería de Organización. Donostia-San Sebastián.España, 1129–1137
  9. Pejić, V., Lisec, A. (2016) Combining Lean and green in logistics: a survey of logistics companies in Slovenia. Acomplishing goals of tertiary environmental education by using debate as an educational method, 531–552.
  10. Rodrigues, H. S., Alves, W., Silva, Â. (2020). The impact of lean and green practices on logistics performance: a structural equation modelling. Production, 30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.20190072
  11. Informe sobre Operadores Logísticos 2020. Resultados de la Encuesta Técnica (2020). Logísticas Cámara Empresaria de Operadores Logísticos CEDOL. Buenos Aires.
  12. Relatório de Mercado de Condomínios Logísticos 4to trimestre 2022, ABOL (Associacao Brasilera de Operadores Logísticos) (2023). Associacao Brasilera de Operadores Logísticos. Sao Paulo.
  13. Relatório de Mercado de Condomínios Logísticos 3er trimestre 2022, ABOL (Associacao Brasilera de Operadores Logísticos) (2022). Associacao Brasilera de Operadores Logísticos. Sao Paulo.
  14. Relatório de Mercado de Condomínios Logísticos 2do trimestre 2022, ABOL (Associacao Brasilera de Operadores Logísticos) (2022). Associacao Brasilera de Operadores Logísticos. Sao Paulo.
  15. Relatório de Mercado de Condomínios Logísticos 1er trimestre 2022, ABOL (Associacao Brasilera de Operadores Logísticos) (2022). Associacao Brasilera de Operadores Logísticos. Sao Paulo.
  16. Modelo para una gestión de Excelencia Empresas Edición 2019 (2019). Fundación Premio Nacional a la Calidad.
  17. Modelo Iberoamericano de Excelencia en la Gestión V2019 (2019). Fundación Iberoamericana para la Gestión de la Calidad.
  18. Trigoso Vergaray, J. (2021). Relación entre gestión logística y calidad de servicio del cliente interno de la Unidad Logística del INCN, 2020. Available at: https://renati.sunedu.gob.pe/handle/sunedu/3078358
  19. Innovación y Productividad en las Operaciones Logísticas. Cambios y mirada prospectiva de las Operaciones Logísticas (2016). Cámara Empresaria de Operadores Logísticos CEDOL. Buenos Aires.
  20. Pinheiro de Lima, O., Breval Santiago, S., Rodríguez Taboada, C. M., Follmann, N. (2017). Una nueva definición de la logística interna y forma de evaluar la misma. Ingeniare. Revista Chilena de Ingeniería, 25 (2), 264–276. doi: https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-33052017000200264
  21. Mohedano Torres, E. de J., Echeverría Ríos, O. M., Martínez Hernández, M., Lezama León, M. H. (2023). Modelo SERVQUAL para medir la calidad en el servicio en operadores logísticos. Revista CEA, 9 (19), e2234. doi: https://doi.org/10.22430/24223182.2234
  22. Francés, D. S., Saura, I. G., Blasco, M. F. (2009). La influencia de la calidad de servicio logístico en la lealtad. Un análisis del papel moderador de las TIC. Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 15 (3), 33–54.
Study of quality models used by logistics operators in Argentina and South America

Downloads

Published

2023-10-26

How to Cite

Kadener, L., Repetto, H. A., Libertella, A. M. L., & Moltedo, C. (2023). Study of quality models used by logistics operators in Argentina and South America. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 5(2(73), 27–33. https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2023.289735

Issue

Section

Systems and Control Processes