Development of mathematical models of mini-hotel project terms that upgraded its competitiveness

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2014.29597

Keywords:

mini-hotel competitiveness, theory of categories, category-functorial model, project management, project

Abstract

After analyzing the situation of the hotel market in Kharkov, it was found that one of the major problems in projecting of mini-hotels is the excess time and on budget, affecting the competitiveness level. In the current market situation for hosting a successful competition mini-hotels it is should update the ACS hotel management and hotel equipment, study the internal and external markets, conduct market research, implement the innovations and technology, notice vulnerabilities of competitors, exert control action on its own competitiveness and identify its main focus.

Market conditions for the Ukrainian mini-hotel functioning require a new strategic approaches to address their competitiveness. The mini-hotel functioning efficiency at market conditions implies an active search and development of each of its unique competitiveness strategy.
In this regard, the need to develop a mathematical model of mini-hotel project terms is
actual. Mathematical model developed in this paper allows any manager of mini-hotels to find the optimal values of continuous operation at the specified deadline for completion of the project, insurance time reserves for each operation, order relations, the upper and lower limits for duration of each work.

The solution to this problem will give a mini-hotel manager to determine the optimal combination of continuous operation at a predetermined duration of the project, which is significantly simplify the progress of the project and minimize the risks, making the project a success and, thereby, increasing its competitiveness.

Author Biographies

Виктор Макарович Левыкин, Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics, Lenina 16, Kharkov, Ukraine, 61166

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Head of Department

Department of information control systems

Валерия Викторовна Дэвон, Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics, Lenina 16, Kharkov, Ukraine, 61166

Department of information control systems

References

  1. Chaynikova, L. N., Chaynikov, V. N. (2007). Konkurentosposobnost predpriyatiya. Tambov: Izd-vo Tamb. gos. tehn. un-ta, 192.
  2. Honarzadeh, M., Hosseini Ezabady, S. J., Zare Mehrjerdi, Y. (2013). A Conceptual Model for Using Identification Technology via Radio Frequency to Improve CRM System in Tourism Industry. The 7th National & 1th International Conference on Electronic Commerce and Economy, April, 2013. Tehran, Iran.
  3. Porter, M. E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: The Free Press, 91. Available: http://kkozak.wz.cz/Porter.pdf
  4. Nyheim, P., McFadden, F., Connolly, D. (2011). Technology strategies for the hospitality industry. Ed. 2. NJ: Pearson Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, 366.
  5. Nietzsche, F.; Translated from the German Polylova, N. (1990). Sumerky ydolov, yly kak fylosofstvuiut molotom. Sochynenyia, T. 2. Moskva: "Mysl". Available: http://philosophy.ru/library/nietzsche/gotzen.html
  6. Latfullyn, H. R., Nykytyn, A. S., Serebrennykov, S. S. (2014). Teoryia menedzhmenta. Ed. 2. SPb: Pyter, 464. ISBN 978-5-496-00576-0
  7. Krugman, P. (1994). Competitiveness: A Dangerous Obsession. Foreign Affairs, Vol. 73, № 2, 28-44. doi:10.2307/20045917
  8. Porter, M.; In: Shchetynyn, V. D. (2004). Mezhdunarodnaya konkurentsiya. M.: Mezhdunarodnyie otnosheniya, 896.
  9. Marks, K.; In: Enhels, F. (1894). Kapytal: krytyka polytycheskoi ekonomii. T. 3, Kn. III, Ch. 1. Available: http://www.esperanto.mv.ru/Marksismo/Kapital3/kapital3-00.html
  10. Hessamaldin, M. S. (2008). Customer Satisfaction in Four Star Isfahan Hotels. An Application of SERVQUAL Model. Lulea University of Technology, 115. Available: http://epubl.ltu.se/1653-0187/2008/059/LTU-PB-EX-08059-SE.pdf
  11. Huggins, R. (2003, February). Creating a UK Competitiveness Index: Regional and Local Benchmarking. Regional Studies, Vol. 37, № 1, 89–96. doi:10.1080/0034340022000033420
  12. Enright, M. J., Newton, J. (2004, December). Tourism destination competitiveness: a quantitative approach. Tourism Management, Vol. 25, № 6, 777–788. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2004.06.008.
  13. Johns, N., Avcí, T., Karatepe, O. M. (2004, May). Measuring service quality of travel agents: evidence from Northern Cyprus. The Service Industries Journal, Vol. 24, № 3, 82–100. doi:10.1080/0264206042000247777
  14. Sureshchandar, G. S., Rajendran, C., Anantharaman, R. N. (2003). Customer perceptions of service quality in the banking sector of a developing economy: a critical analysis. International Journal of Bank Marketing, Vol. 21, № 5, 233–242. doi:10.1108/02652320310488411
  15. Pro zakhyst vid nedobrosovisnoi konkurentsii. (1996). Zakon Ukrainy № 237/96-VR vid 07.06.96. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy (VVR), N 36, st. 164. Available: http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/236/96-вр
  16. Barkalov, S. A., Voropaev, V. Y., Sekletova, H. Y. et al; In: Burkov, V. N. (2005). Matematicheskie osnovyi upravleniya proektami. M.: Vyissh. shk., 423.

Published

2014-12-11

How to Cite

Левыкин, В. М., & Дэвон, В. В. (2014). Development of mathematical models of mini-hotel project terms that upgraded its competitiveness. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 6(2(20), 45–51. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2014.29597