Technology audit of the Nigerian agricultural sector: towards food security

Authors

  • Rachael Aderonke Ayo-Lawal Obafemi Awolowo University, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2024.299274

Keywords:

technology audit, agriculture sector, economic development, sustainable agriculture, innovative agricultural growth

Abstract

Technology-driven innovation has been generally believed to play a key role in the building of a sustainable economy. The object of the research is the audit of agricultural technology for businesses in Nigeria. This research aimed to audit the existing technologies for agricultural businesses in Nigeria, in a bid to determine the technological strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and needs that are required to transform the sector to an enviable status.

The methodology involved the use of a well-structured questionnaire for data collection from 133 randomly selected agriculture-based firms, spread across the country. The instrument inquired about the technology use, needs, and prospective technological potentials. Issues relating to effective utilization, technology diffusion, and factors affecting the firms were also assessed.

The results of the technology audit of the Nigerian agriculture sector revealed the prevalence of medium and low-classed technologies among the surveyed firms, while a majority desired the technologies in the medium-to-high category. Firms scarcely (4.4 %) deploy high technologies, and effective diffusion of available technologies is due largely to human/technical factors. A good percentage of respondents affirmed competency and continuous training as critical factors for the effective utilization of technologies. Finances are critical not only to acquire, but also to run, maintain, hire experts, and perform other necessary activities that would enhance effective use of technologies.

The present results revealed that most firms do not opt for high technologies mainly because of a huge capital base, and unavailability of basic infrastructures such as power, and space which many of the surveyed firms considered unsurmountable. Thus, a lot is required technology-wise for Nigeria to achieve sustainable and innovative agricultural growth.

Supporting Agency

  • The project received financial support from the Nigerian Government through the Federal Ministry of Science and Technology.

Author Biography

Rachael Aderonke Ayo-Lawal, Obafemi Awolowo University

PhD, Research Officer

Department of Science, Policy Research and Innovation Studies

National Centre for Technology Management

References

  1. CBN (1980). Central Bank of Nigeria Statistical Bulletin. Lagos
  2. Anyaehie, M. C., Areji, A. C. (2015). Economic Diversification for Sustainable Development in Nigeria. Open Journal of Political Science, 5 (2), 87–94. doi: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojps.2015.52010
  3. Ogochukwu, O. N. (2016). The Oil Price Fall and the Impact on the Nigerian Economy: A Call for Diversification. Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization, 48 (11), 84–93.
  4. The role of science, technology and innovation in ensuring food security by 2030 (2017). United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. UNCTD, 9–25.
  5. Muhammad-Lawal, A., Atte, O. A. (2006). An analysis of agricultural production in Nigeria. African Journal of General Agriculture, 2.
  6. FAO assesses food security in Africa (2017). Food and Agricultural Organisation. Available at: http://sdg.iisd.org/news/fao-2017
  7. Leta, G., Stellmacher, T., Kelboro, G., Van Assche, K., Hornidge, A.-K. (2018). Social learning in smallholder agriculture: the struggle against systemic inequalities. Journal of Workplace Learning, 30 (6), 469–487. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/jwl-12-2017-0115
  8. Shahzad, A., Abbas, M. (2022). The impact of technology audit on technology capabilities in Pakistani training institutes. Journal of Engineering Management and Competitiveness, 12 (2), 151–164. doi: https://doi.org/10.5937/jemc2202151s
  9. Nwankpa, N. (2017). Sustainable agricultural development in Nigeria: a way out of hunger and poverty. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 6 (4), 175–184. doi: https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2017.v6n4p175
  10. Olajumoke, O. I., Oluwagbemiga, O. (2017). Effect of Industrial Waste Management on Workers Health in Selected Industries in Nigeria. International Journal of Waste Resources, 7 (2). doi: https://doi.org/10.4172/2252-5211.1000278
  11. Economic Recovery and Growth Plan (2017–2020). Federal Republic of Nigeria, Ministry of Budget and National Planning (2017). FRN. Abuja.
  12. Mgbenka, R. N., Mbah, E. N., Ezeano, C. I. (2015). A Review of Small holder Farming in Nigeria: Need for Transformation. Agricultural Engineering Research Journal, 5 (2), 19–26.
  13. Sabo, B. B., Isah, S. D., Chamo, A. M., Rabiu, M. A. (2017). Role of smallholder farmers in Nigeria’s food security. Scholarly Journal of Agricultural Science, 7 (1), 1–5.
  14. Global financial development report 2019/2020: Bank regulation and supervision a decade after the global financial crisis (2019). The World Bank.
  15. Nigeria Digital Economy Diagnostic Report (No. 140845). (2019). World Bank, 96.
  16. Kassie, M., Shiferaw, B., Muricho, G. (2011). Agricultural Technology, Crop Income, and Poverty Alleviation in Uganda. World Development, 39 (10), 1784–1795. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.04.023
  17. Maertens, A., Barrett, C. B. (2013). Measuring Social Networks’ Effects on Agricultural Technology Adoption. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 0649330, 19. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/39b2/f603961bbdd3134728ed833cd6d19b1cde9a.pdf
  18. Mottaleb, K. A. (2018). Perception and adoption of a new agricultural technology: Evidence from a developing country. Technology in Society, 55, 126–135. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.07.007
  19. Hatzichronoglou, T. (1997). Revision of the High-Technology Sector and Product Classification. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD), 97 (2016). doi: https://doi.org/10.1787/050148678127
  20. Hossain, M. (2010). Shallow Tubewells, Boro Rice, and Their Impact on Food Security in Bangladesh. Proven Successes in Agricultural Development: A Technical Compendium to Millions Fed. Available at: http://www.cosv.org/download/centrodocumentazione/proven successes in agricultural development.pdf#page=258
  21. Uprety, R. (2010). Meshing mechanization with SRI methods for rice cultivation in Nepal. Paper Presented at Rice for Future Generations the Third International Rice Congress IRC 812 November 2010 in Hanoi Vietnam, 1–5.
  22. Truong, T. N. C. (2008). Factors Affecting Technology Adoption Among Rice Farmers in the Mekong Delta Through the Lens of the Local Authorial Managers: An Analysis of Qualitative Data. Omonrice, 16, 107–112. Available at: https://sid.ir/paper/608762/en
  23. Classification of manufacturing industries into categories based on R&D intensities (2011). ISIC REV. 3 Technology Intensity Definition. OECD, 6.
  24. Khalil, T. (2000). Management of technology: The key to competitiveness and wealth creation. Singapore: McGraw-Hill.
  25. Vlok, N. (2003). Technology Auditing as a Means of Ensuring Business Continuity in a Manufacturing Organization. Faculty of Management.
  26. Kovács, G., Stion, Z. (2016). Innovation Audit as a Tool for Boosting Innovation Power of Universities. Zarzadzanie Publiczne, 3 (35), 221–235. doi: https://doi.org/10.4467/20843968ZP.17.018.5520
  27. Naik, S. L., Saunshi, B. (2017). Structural Audit of Rcc Building. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 2395–56.
  28. Pakucs, J., Papanek, G. (Eds.) (2006). Innováció menedzsment kézikönyv, Magyar Innovációs Szövetség, Budapest.
  29. Gordon, S. R., Tarafdar, M. (2010). The IT audit that boosts innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 51 (4), 39–47.
  30. Kelessidis, V. (2000). Technology audit: Report produced for the EC funded project. Thessaloniki Technology Park. Available at: https://www.slideshare.net/jayanne07/innoregio-techn-audits
  31. Bell, B., Pearson, J. (1992). Better learning. International Journal of Science Education, 14 (3), 349–361. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069920140310
  32. Girasoli, A. J., Hannafin, R. D. (2008). Using asynchronous AV communication tools to increase academic self-efficacy. Computers and Education, 51 (4), 1676–1682. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.04.005
  33. Wilden, R., Gudergan, S. P. (2014). The impact of dynamic capabilities on operational marketing and technological capabilities: investigating the role of environmental turbulence. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43 (2), 181–199. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0380-y
  34. Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (Msme) National Survey 2017 Report (2017). Available at: https://www.nigerianstat.gov.ng/pdfuploads/SMEDAN%20REPORT%20Launch%20Presentation%202017.pdf
  35. Mgbenka, R. N., Mbah, E. N., Ezeano, C. I. (2016). A review of smallholder farming in Nigeria: Need for transformation. International Journal of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development Studies, 3 (2), 43–54.
  36. Li, H., Huang, D., Ma, Q., Qi, W., Li, H. (2019). Factors Influencing the Technology Adoption Behaviours of Litchi Farmers in China. Sustainability, 12 (1), 271. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010271
  37. Oyedepo, S. O. (2012). Energy and sustainable development in Nigeria: the way forward. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 2 (1). doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-0567-2-15
  38. Chete, L. N., Adeoti, J. O., Adeyinka, F. M., Ogundele, O. (2014). WIDER Working Paper 2014/019 Industrial development and growth in Nigeria: Lessons and challenges. doi: https://doi.org/10.35188/unu-wider/2014/740-0
  39. Ramachandran, N., Ali AL Yahmadi, H. M. (2019). Challenges Faced by SMEs in Oman. Shanlax International Journal of Arts, Science and Humanities, 7 (1), 15–25. doi: https://doi.org/10.34293/sijash.v7i1.496
  40. Creating markets: Main report (2017). IFC annual report Washington, D.C: World Bank Group. Available at: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/456851507282412413/Main-report
  41. Anyanwu, J. C. (1997). Nigerian Public Finance. Onitsha: Joanne Educational Publishers.
  42. Agwu, A. E. (2007). Adoption of improved oil palm production and processing technologies in Arochukwu local government area of Abia state, Nigeria. Agro-Science, 5 (1), 26–35. doi: https://doi.org/10.4314/as.v5i1.1541
  43. Ohikere, J. Z., Arudi, I. S. (2011). Challenges to the transfer of agricultural technologies in Nigeria. Nigerian Society for Experimental Biology Journal, 11 (1), 29–35.
  44. Ohikere, J. Z., Arudi, I. S. (2019). Challenges to the transfer of agricultural technologies in Nigeria. NISEB Journal, 11 (1).
Technology audit of the Nigerian agricultural sector: towards food security

Downloads

Published

2024-02-29

How to Cite

Ayo-Lawal, R. A. (2024). Technology audit of the Nigerian agricultural sector: towards food security. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 1(4(75), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2024.299274

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 4(75) (2024): Economics of enterprises. Macroeconomics

Section

Development of Productive Forces and Regional Economy

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Rachael Aderonke Ayo-Lawal

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.