Evaluation of the performance of data classification models for aerial imagery under resource constraints

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2025.323322

Keywords:

neural networks, machine learning, image processing, classification, convolutional neural networks, unmanned aerial vehicles

Abstract

The object of the study is the process of aerial imagery data processing under limited computational resources, particularly onboard unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) using classification models.

One of the most challenging issues is the adaptation of classification models to scale variations and perspective distortions that occur during UAV maneuvers. Additionally, the high computational complexity of traditional methods, such as sliding window approaches, significantly limits their applicability on resource-constrained devices.

The study utilized state-of-the-art neural network classifiers, including ResNet50v2, DenseNet121, and MobileNetV2, which were fine-tuned on a specialized aerial imagery dataset.

An experimental evaluation of the proposed neural network classifiers was conducted on Raspberry Pi 4 Model B and OrangePi 5 Pro platforms with limited computational power, simulating the constrained resources of UAV systems. To optimize performance, a stripe-based processing approach was proposed for streaming video, ensuring a balance between processing speed and the amount of analyzed data for surveillance applications. Specific execution time evaluations were obtained for different types of classifiers running on single-board computers suitable for UAV deployment.

This approach enables real-time aerial imagery processing, significantly enhancing UAV system autonomy. Compared to traditional methods, the proposed solutions offer advantages such as reduced power consumption, accelerated computations, and improved classification accuracy. These results demonstrate high potential for implementation in various fields, including military operations, reconnaissance, search-and-rescue missions, and agricultural technology applications.

Author Biographies

Pylyp Prystavka, State Non-Profit Enterprise “Kyiv Aviation Institute”

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Head of Department

Department of Applied Mathematics

Olha Cholyshkina, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Intelligent Systems

Valerii Zivakin, State Non-Profit Enterprise “Kyiv Aviation Institute”

PhD, Senior Lecturer

Department of Applied Mathematics

Borys Stetsenko, State Non-Profit Enterprise “Kyiv Aviation Institute”

Department of Applied Mathematics

References

  1. Chyrkov, A., Prystavka, P.; Hu, Z., Petoukhov, S., Dychka, I., He, M. (Eds.) (2018). Suspicious Object Search in Airborne Camera Video Stream. ICCSEEA 2018. Advances in Computer Science for Engineering and Education, 340–348. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91008-6_34
  2. Prystavka, P., Shevchenko, A., Rokitianska, I. (2024). Comparative Analysis of Detector-Tracker Architecture for Object Tracking Based on SBC for UAV. 2024 IEEE 7th International Conference on Actual Problems of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Development (APUAVD), 175–178. https://doi.org/10.1109/apuavd64488.2024.10765890
  3. Prystavka, P., Chyrkov, A., Sorokopud, V., Kovtun, V. (2019). Automated Complex for Aerial Reconnaissance Tasks in Modern Armed Conflicts. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2588, 57–66.
  4. Prystavka, P., Cholyshkina, O., Dolgikh, S., Karpenko, D. (2020). Automated Object Recognition System based on Convolutional Autoencoder. 2020 10th International Conference on Advanced Computer Information Technologies (ACIT), 830–833. https://doi.org/10.1109/acit49673.2020.9208945
  5. Redmon, J., Farhadi, A. (2017). YOLO9000: Better, Faster, Stronger. 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 6517–6525. https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2017.690
  6. Tian, Y., Wang, S., Li, E., Yang, G., Liang, Z., Tan, M. (2023). MD-YOLO: Multi-scale Dense YOLO for small target pest detection. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 213, 108233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2023.108233
  7. Fedus, W., Zoph, B., Shazeer, N. (2022). Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsity. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 23. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2101.03961
  8. Shaw, A., Hunter, D., Landola, F., Sidhu, S. (2019). SqueezeNAS: Fast Neural Architecture Search for Faster Semantic Segmentation. 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision Workshop (ICCVW), 2014–2024. https://doi.org/10.1109/iccvw.2019.00251
  9. Wu, B., Wan, A., Iandola, F., Jin, P. H., Keutzer, K. (2017). SqueezeDet: Unified, Small, Low Power Fully Convolutional Neural Networks for Real-Time Object Detection for Autonomous Driving. 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), 446–454. https://doi.org/10.1109/cvprw.2017.60
  10. Bello, I., Fedus, W., Du, X., Cubuk, E. D., Shlens, J., Zoph, B. et al. (2021). Revisiting ResNets: Improved Training and Scaling Strategies. Advances in Neural. Information Processing Systems, 27, 22614–22627. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2103.07579
  11. Tomasello, P., Sidhu, S., Shen, A., Moskewicz, M. W., Redmon, N., Joshi, G. et al. (2019). DSCnet: Replicating Lidar Point Clouds With Deep Sensor Cloning. 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), 1317–1325. https://doi.org/10.1109/cvprw.2019.00171
  12. Qin, D., Leichner, C., Delakis, M., Fornoni, M., Luo, S., Yang, F. et al. (2024). MobileNetV4: Universal Models for the Mobile Ecosystem. Computer Vision – ECCV 2024, 78–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-73661-2_5
  13. Orange Pi 5 vs Raspberry Pi 4 Model B Rev 1.2. Available at: https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/compare/19357188?baseline=19357599&utm_source=chatgpt.com
  14. Zivakin, V., Kozachuk, O., Prystavka, P., Cholyshkina, O. (2022). Training set AERIAL SURVEY for Data Recognition Systems From Aerial Surveillance Cameras. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 3347, 246–255.
Evaluation of the performance of data classification models for aerial imagery under resource constraints

Downloads

Published

2025-02-24

How to Cite

Prystavka, P., Cholyshkina, O., Zivakin, V., & Stetsenko, B. (2025). Evaluation of the performance of data classification models for aerial imagery under resource constraints. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 1(2(81), 43–48. https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2025.323322

Issue

Section

Systems and Control Processes