Economic assessment of intellectual and innovative technologies in the context of sustainable development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2025.323977Keywords:
intellectualisation of technologies, intellectual and innovative technologies, business sustainability, assessment of intellectual technologiesAbstract
The object of research is the processes of economic evaluation of intellectual and innovative technologies in the context of sustainable development. The problem of economic evaluation of such technologies is caused by the insufficiency of the current methodological framework, which is substantiated with the use of the VosViewer bibliometric toolkit.
The paper identifies the need to implement intellectual and innovative technologies aimed at achieving the goals of sustainable development, as well as their projects, using the example of the Golden Ducat Jewellery Company (Ukraine). To substantiate the choice of intellectual and innovative technologies, a methodological approach has been developed based on a system of parameters for expert assessment of the level of intellectualisation of technologies (autonomy, adaptability, machine learning, interactivity, integration). The author's approach is proposed to be implemented with the help of a mathematical model based on matrices, using the methods of fuzzy set theory.
The practical results of applying the model have shown that the most intellectualised technology is the interactive jewellery design studio, which corresponds to the system of parameters by 73.43 %. Other technologies have lower degrees of compliance: 3D visualisation and virtual fitting – 47.16 %, integration of online platforms – 40.50 %, interactive learning services – 34.09 %, and eco-design of products – 23.35 %. The article compares the parameters of intellectualisation of technologies with the expected economic performance of a company due to the implementation of these technologies. It is found that the parameters of ‘autonomy’ and ‘machine learning’ have the greatest impact on the level of intellectualisation. Accordingly, the most effective technologies are an interactive jewellery design studio (ROI – 64.19 %, payback period – 7.3 months) and eco-design of products (ROI – 69.47 %, payback period – 7.2 months). It is found that for a reasonable choice of intellectual and innovative technologies it is important to take into account factors such as market demand, long-term trends and business specifics.
References
- Spending on digital transformation technologies and services worldwide from 2017 to 2027 (in trillion U.S. dollars) (2024). Statista. Available at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/870924/worldwide-digital-transformation-market-size/
- PwC. Available at: https://www.pwc.com/ua/uk/about.html
- Our Research. McKinsey Global Institute. Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/mgi/our-research/all-research
- Za rezultatamy doslidzhennia Deloitte 2024 Global Human Capital Trends naiaktualnishymy pytanniamy u sviti ye dovira ta stalyi rozvytok liudskoho kapitalu (2024). Deloitte. Available at: https://www2.deloitte.com/ua/uk/pages/press-room/press-release/2024/human-capital-trends.html
- Pererva, P., Kuchynskyi, V., Kobielieva, T., Kosenko, A., Maslak, O. (2021). Economic substantiation of outsourcing the information technologies and logistic services in the intellectual and innovative activities of an enterprise. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4 (13 (112)), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.239164
- Prokhorova, V., Mrykhina, O., Koleshchuk, O., Stepura, T., Zaitseva, A., Slastianykova, K. (2024). Assessment of digital culture in sustainable university development systems. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6 (13 (132)), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2024.317063
- Mrykhina, O., Lisovska, L. (2020). Methodical Approach to Pricing of R&D Products During their Transfer from Universities to Business Environment. 2020 IEEE 15th International Conference on Computer Sciences and Information Technologies (CSIT), 241–246. https://doi.org/10.1109/csit49958.2020.9321884
- Prokhorova, V., Yemelyanov, O., Koleshchuk, O., Us, Y. (2024). Innovative approaches to evaluating energy efficiency potential at enterprises. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, 6, 178–185. https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2024-6/178
- Alami, H., Lehoux, P., Auclair, Y., de Guise, M., Gagnon, M.-P., Shaw, J. et al. (2020). Artificial Intelligence and Health Technology Assessment: Anticipating a New Level of Complexity. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22 (7), e17707. https://doi.org/10.2196/17707
- Li, X., Nosheen, S., Haq, N. U., Gao, X. (2021). Value creation during fourth industrial revolution: Use of intellectual capital by most innovative companies of the world. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 163, 120479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120479
- Bilan, Y., Mishchuk, H., Roshchyk, I., Kmecova, I. (2020). An Analysis of Intellecutal Potential and its Impact on the Social and Economic Development of European Countries. Journal of Competitiveness, 12 (1), 22–38. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2020.01.02
- Kang, Y. (2023). Research on intellectual property financing mode of technology-based small and medium-sized enterprises. Financial Engineering and Risk Management, 6 (1). https://doi.org/10.23977/ferm.2023.060106
- Farzaneh, M., Wilden, R., Afshari, L., Mehralian, G. (2022). Dynamic capabilities and innovation ambidexterity: The roles of intellectual capital and innovation orientation. Journal of Business Research, 148, 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.030
- Secundo, G., Ndou, V., Vecchio, P. D., De Pascale, G. (2020). Sustainable development, intellectual capital and technology policies: A structured literature review and future research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 153, 119917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119917
- Bai, C., Dallasega, P., Orzes, G., Sarkis, J. (2020). Industry 4.0 technologies assessment: A sustainability perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 229, 107776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107776
- Gross-Gołacka, E., Kusterka-Jefmańska, M., Jefmański, B. (2020). Can Elements of Intellectual Capital Improve Business Sustainability? – The Perspective of Managers of SMEs in Poland. Sustainability, 12 (4), 1545. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041545
- Miranda, J., Ponce, P., Molina, A., Wright, P. (2019). Sensing, smart and sustainable technologies for Agri-Food 4.0. Computers in Industry, 108, 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2019.02.002
- Oláh, J., Aburumman, N., Popp, J., Khan, M. A., Haddad, H., Kitukutha, N. (2020). Impact of Industry 4.0 on Environmental Sustainability. Sustainability, 12 (11), 4674. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114674
- What Are Customer Expectations, and How Have They Changed? Salesforce. Available at: https://www.salesforce.com/resources/articles/customer-expectations/
- Consumer Trends Index 2023. Available at: https://www.cheetahdigital.com/wp-content/uploads/0323_MG_CTI_Infographic_Global-4.pdf
- Shoda, A. (2024). The Power of Personalization: How Tailored Customer Experiences Fuel Business Growth. Doola. Available at: https://www.doola.com/blog/the-power-of-personalization-how-tailored-customer-experiences-fuel-business-growth/
- Asotsiatsiia riteileriv Ukrainy (2024). Available at: https://rau.ua/dosvid/personalizatsiyu-na-sajti-retail/
- How To Create a Customer-Centric Experience (2022). Salesforce. Available at: https://www.salesforce.com/blog/how-to-create-a-customer-centric-experience/
- Statista. Available at: https://www.statista.com/
- McKinsey & Company. Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/
- Deloitte. Available at: https://www2.deloitte.com/ua/uk.html
- Sorokina, L. V., Hoiko, A. F. (2017). Rozdil 1.5.2. Ekspertna otsinka efektyvnosti proektnykh rishen na osnovi teoriyi nechitkykh mnozhyn. Ekonometrychnyi instrumentariy upravlinnia finansovoiu bezpekoiu pidpryiemstv budivnytstva. Kyiv: FOP Cherniavskyi D.O., 51–57.
- Rotshtein, O. P. (1999). Intelektualni tekhnolohiy identyfikatsiyi: nechitki mnozhyny, henetychni alhorytmy, neironni merezhi. Vinnytsia: Universum-Vinnytsia, 323.
- Prokhorova, V., Mrykhina, O., Koleshchuk, O., Demianenko, T. (2024). Assessing the effectiveness of implementing immersive technologies within university sustainable development systems. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5 (13 (131)), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2024.314232
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Viktoriia Prokhorova, Oleksandra Mrykhina, Orest Koleshchuk , Anatoliy Babichev, Iuliia Dudnieva, Krystyna Slastianykova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.
