Formation of an ESG management system based on digital analytics

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2026.357883

Keywords:

sustainable development, agricultural sector, ESG management, digital analytics, CSRD

Abstract

The object of research is the process of forming an ESG management system based on digital analytics (DA). The research addresses the issue of implementing value-based sustainable development guidelines in the agricultural sector through ESG-oriented resource management mechanisms using DA tools. The theoretical and applied parts of the research are based on a combination of a systemic vision of the problem under study, analytical procedures, comparative analysis, and economic-mathematical tools. The empirical basis of the research was formed through the analysis of data for 2020–2024. The research incorporates reports of agri-food companies, materials from international institutions, as well as EU documents regulating digitalization in food supply chains. On this basis, an economic and statistical analysis was conducted to assess the role of DA in shaping the ESG management system in the agricultural sector. Economic and mathematical modeling was applied to identify relationships between the efficiency of resource use by enterprises and their performance according to ESG criteria. The obtained results made it possible to establish that, in the process of forming ESG-oriented management, DA can serve as an important tool for transforming primary information on the use of natural resources into a system of measurable ESG indicators. Such indicators can be used both in internal enterprise management and during auditing or comparison of performance results across different periods. The model developed in the research was tested using data from the agricultural sector of Ukraine. The results of its application confirmed the existence of a stable relationship between the level of resource efficiency in production, economic performance, and environmental parameters included in the ESG framework.

Author Biographies

Oleh Kniaz, Lviv Polytechnic National University

PhD

Department of Entrepreneurship and Environmental Expertise of Goods

Petro Pererva, National Technical University “Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute”

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor

Department of Business Economics and International Economic Relations

Nelli Heorhiadi, Lviv Polytechnic National University

Doctor of Economics, Professor

Department of Management and International Entrepreneurship

Roksolana Vilhutska, Lviv Polytechnic National University

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Management and International Entrepreneurship

Khrystyna Peredalo, Lviv Polytechnic National University

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Foreign Economic and Customs Activities

References

  1. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman. Available at: https://archive.org/details/strategicmanagem00free
  2. Our common future (1987). World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 383. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/10711693/Our_common_future_By_World_commission_on_environment_and_development_London_Oxford_University_Press_1987_pp_383_5_95_
  3. Porter, M. E., Linde, C. (1995). Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9 (4), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.97
  4. Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford: Capstone. Available at: https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2092269
  5. Sustainability reporting guidelines (2000). Global Reporting Initiative. Available at: https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/gri-standards-download-center
  6. Porter, M. E., Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89 (1–2), 62–77. Available at: https://hbr.org/2011/01/the-big-idea-creating-shared-value
  7. Kniaz, S., Kosovska, V., Shayda, O., Novosad, Z., Yaremko, L., Fedyuk, V. (2021). Method of Selection of Indicators in the Context of Information and Analytical Support of Evaluation of Development of Foreign Economic Activity of Enterprises. 2021 11th International Conference on Advanced Computer Information Technologies (ACIT). Deggendorf: IEEE, 389–392. https://doi.org/10.1109/acit52158.2021.9548613
  8. Mysiuk, R. V., Yuzevych, V. M., Yasinskyi, M. F., Kniaz, S. V., Duriagina, Z. A., Kulyk, V. V. (2022). Determination of conditions for loss of bearing capacity of underground ammonia pipelines based on the monitoring data and flexible search algorithms. Archives of Materials Science and Engineering, 115 (1), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0016.0671
  9. Kniaz, S., Brych, V., Marhasova, V., Tyrkalo, Y., Skrynkovskyy, R., Sumets, A. (2022). Modeling of the Information System of Environmental Risk Management of an Enterprise. 2022 12th International Conference on Advanced Computer Information Technologies (ACIT). Ruzomberok: IEEE, 215–218. https://doi.org/10.1109/acit54803.2022.9912743
  10. Yap, C. K., Leow, C. S. (2023). Environment, social and governance in sustainable agricultural practices in developing countries: A short note. Sustainable Social Development, 1 (3). https://doi.org/10.54517/ssd.v1i3.2337
  11. Julkovski, D. J., Sehnem, S., Stenger, E. A. F. (2023). ESG guidelines for agribusiness. Revista Pensamento Contemporâneo Em Administração, 17 (4), 74–89. https://doi.org/10.12712/rpca.v17i4.60261
  12. Kniaz, S., Podolchack, N., Dziurakh, Y., Karkovska, V., Kucher, A. (2023). Development of government regulation on investment activities in agriculture of Ukraine. Economic Studies, 32 (2), 136–150. Available at: https://ideas.repec.org/a/bas/econst/y2023i2p136-150.html
  13. Annosi, M. C., Appio, F. P., Brenes, E. R., Brunetta, F. (2024). Exploring the nexus of digital transformation and sustainability in agribusiness: Advancing a research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 206, 123587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123587
  14. Huseynli, J., Huseynov, Y., Totubaeva, N., Guliyev, M., Azizova, G. (2024). The role of ESG in the adaptation of the agro-industrial sector to climate change. Scientific Horizons, 27 (5), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.48077/scihor5.2024.131
  15. Hopka, M., Kovtun, O. (2024). Features of implementation of ESG management criteria in Ukrainian agriculture in the context of global challenges and EU integration. Biological Systems: Theory and Innovation, 15 (3), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.31548/economics/3.2024.87
  16. Yap, C. K., Al-Mutairi, K. A. (2024). A Conceptual Model Relationship between Industry 4.0 – Food-Agriculture Nexus and Agroecosystem: A Literature Review and Knowledge Gaps. Foods, 13 (1), 150. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13010150
  17. Kniaz, S., Brych, V., Heorhiadi, N., Shevchenko, S., Dzvonyk, R., Skrynkovskyy, R. (2024). Enhancing the Informativeness of Managing Mentoring Activities based on Simulation Modeling. 2024 14th International Conference on Advanced Computer Information Technologies (ACIT). Ceske Budejovice: IEEE, 8, 384–388. https://doi.org/10.1109/acit62333.2024.10712547
  18. Kniaz, S., Brych, V., Heorhiadi, N., Shevchenko, S., Dzvonyk, R., Skrynkovskyy, R. (2024). Informational-Reflective Management of Mentoring Activities Development in the Enterprise. 2024 14th International Conference on Advanced Computer Information Technologies (ACIT). Ceske Budejovice: IEEE, 13, 389–392. https://doi.org/10.1109/acit62333.2024.10712601
  19. Witt, N., Thorsøe, M. H., Graversgaard, M. (2025). ESG reporting meets farmer – implications of the European corporate sustainability reporting directive for the agrifood sector. British Food Journal, 127 (13), 264–283. https://doi.org/10.1108/bfj-01-2024-0110
  20. Mutswiri, P. (2025). ESG integration and sustainability in African agribusiness: A review of challenges, practices and impacts. The Dyke, 19 (1), 667–687. https://doi.org/10.64754/thedyke.v19i1.490
  21. Alsanhani, A. N., Al-Shayaa, M. S., Dabiah, A. T., Alfridi, J. S. (2025). Advancing Sustainable Agriculture Through Digital Technology: The Role of the Agricultural Guide App in Improving Olive Farming Practices in Saudi Arabia. Sustainability, 17 (6), 2340. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17062340
  22. Greenhouse gas emissions from agrifood systems: Global, regional and country trends 2000–2022 (2024). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available at: https://www.fao.org/statistics/highlights-archive/highlights-detail/greenhouse-gas-emissions-from-agrifood-systems.-global--regional-and-country-trends--2000-2022/en
  23. Deforestation Regulation implementation: Traceability and geolocation of commodities subject to EUDR (2024). European Commission. Available at: https://green-forum.ec.europa.eu/nature-and-biodiversity/deforestation-regulation-implementation/traceability-and-geolocation-commodities-subject-eudr_en
  24. Strategy Report: Annual Report 2021 (2021). Olam Group Limited. Available at: https://www.olamgroup.com/content/dam/olamgroup/investor-relations/ir-library/annual-reports/annual-reports-pdfs/2021/olam_strategy_report_2021.pdf
  25. Impact Report 2024 (2024). Cargill. Available at: https://www.cargill.com/sustainability/doc/1432271051366/2024-impact-report-summary.pdf
  26. Bayer Sustainability Report 2022 (2023). Bayer. Available at: https://www.bayer.com/sites/default/files/2023-02/Bayer-Sustainability-Report-2022.pdf
  27. DATA-DRIVEN DIGITAL AGRICULTURE. (2021). World Bank. Available at: https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/1a163904ccb86646bf2e5d3d6f427f3d-0090012023/related/WB-DDAG-FA-web.pdf
  28. Use of inorganic and organic fertilizers, use of pesticides (1990–2024). (2024). State Statistics Service of Ukraine. Available at: https://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/operativ/operativ2021/sg/vmod90_20ue.xls
  29. Agricultural productionin in 2016 constant prices 2022. (2022). State Statistics Service of Ukraine. Available at: https://ukrstat.gov.ua/operativ/operativ2022/sg/psg_pc/pcg_pc_22_ue.xlsx
  30. Agricultural production at constant prices. (2024). State Statistics Service of Ukraine. Available at: https://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/operativ/operativ2017/sg/pro_sg/arch_pro_sg_p_e.htm
  31. Indices of agricultural production (1991–2024). (2024). State Statistics Service of Ukraine. Available at: https://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/operativ/operativ2020/sg/sg_rik/arch_iosv_e.htm
  32. Indices of agricultural production. (2024). State Statistics Service of Ukraine. https://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/operativ/operativ2020/sg/ivp/arch_ivp20e.htm
  33. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAOSTAT. Available at: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/RFN
  34. Common agricultural policy overview. European Commission. Available at: https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/common-agricultural-policy/cap-overview_en
  35. Indeksy silʹsʹkohospodarsʹkoyi produktsiyi (2010–2024). Holovne upravlinnya statystyky u Kharkivsʹkiy oblasti. Available at: https://kh.ukrstat.gov.ua/indeksy-obsiahu-silskohospodarskoho-vyrobnytstva
Formation of an ESG management system based on digital analytics

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

Kniaz, O. ., Pererva, P. ., Heorhiadi, N., Vilhutska, R. ., & Peredalo, K. (2026). Formation of an ESG management system based on digital analytics. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 2(4(88), 98–111. https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2026.357883