Comparative analysis of methods and information models of structuring information in educational process

Authors

  • Виктор Анатольевич Крисилов Odessa national polytechnic university, 1, Shevchenko avenue, Odessa, Ukraine, 65044, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6095-8355
  • Станислав Юрьевич Марулин Odessa national polytechnic university, 1, Shevchenko avenue, Odessa, Ukraine, 65044, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0755-0104
  • Салех Ал Асвад Odessa national polytechnic university, 1, Shevchenko avenue, Odessa, Ukraine, 65044, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2015.37613

Keywords:

quality of education, model and method of structuring information, granule of information

Abstract

In this work comparative analysis of methods and information models of structuring information in educational process was carried out.

Presented analysis describes the advantages and disadvantages of existing models and methods in preparation of elementary educational units - modules.

As a result of this review three criteria for models of educational material presentation were established: the complexity of structuring the full amount of educational material, the number of units of the model, the effect of the absence of several elements of the model on system general operation.

It is shown that none of the models and methods do not allow to determine the  indicator of volume and repetition time, it is important for recovery in the memory of previously studied material and  activation of mental abilities of students.

Author Biographies

Виктор Анатольевич Крисилов, Odessa national polytechnic university, 1, Shevchenko avenue, Odessa, Ukraine, 65044

Doctor of Engineering, Professor

System Software Department

Станислав Юрьевич Марулин, Odessa national polytechnic university, 1, Shevchenko avenue, Odessa, Ukraine, 65044

Candidate of Technical Science, Senior Lecturer

System software department

Салех Ал Асвад, Odessa national polytechnic university, 1, Shevchenko avenue, Odessa, Ukraine, 65044

PhD student

System software department

References

  1. Krisilov, V. A., Poberezhnik, S. M., Tarasenko, R. A. (1998). Sravnitel'nyi analiz modelei predstavleniia znanii v intellektual'nyh sistemah. Trudy Odesskogo politehnicheskogo universiteta, 2, 45-49.
  2. Goroshko, E. I. (2001). Integrativnaia model' svobodnogo assotsiativnogo eksperimenta. H.; M.: RA – Karavella, 320.
  3. Mitchell, C. J., De Houwer, J., Lovibond, P. F. (2009, April). The propositional nature of human associative learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 32, № 02, 183-198. doi:10.1017/s0140525x09000855
  4. Farrand, P., Hussain, F., Hennessy, E. (2002, May). The efficacy of the `mind map’ study technique. Medical Education, Vol. 36, № 5, 426–431. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01205.x
  5. Makarova, M. V. (2009). Realizatsiia kreditno-modul'noi sistemy prepodavaniia v vuze s ispol'zovaniem Internet-tehnologii. Upravliaiushchie sistemy i mashiny: informatsionnye tehnologii, 2, 88-91.
  6. Morozov, V. P., Tihomirov, V. P., Hrustalev, E. Yu. (1997). Giperteksty v ekonomike. Informatsionnaia tehnologiia modelirovaniia. М.: Finansy i statistika, 256.
  7. Kaplan, C., Fenwick, J., Chen, J. (1993, September). Adaptive hypertext navigation based on user goals and context. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, Vol. 3, № 3, 193–220. doi:10.1007/bf01257889
  8. Lee, K., Lee, Y. K., Berra, P. B. (1997). Management of Multi-structured Hypermedia Documents: A Data Model, Query Language, and Indexing Scheme. Multimedia Database Management Systems. Springer US, 107–131. doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-6149-1_6
  9. Jonassen, D. H., Wang, S. (1993). Acquiring structural knowledge from semantically structured hypertext. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 20(1), 1-8.
  10. Krisilov, V. A., Alasvad, S. (2013). Trehurovnevaia model' informatsionnogo uchebnogo protsessa. Holodil'na tehnіka і tehnologіia, 4(144), 99-102.
  11. Kovaleva, S. V., Shabanova, I. A., Chirkova, S. E. (2011). O podgotovke nauchnoi informatsii k uchebnomu protsessu. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, 2, 70–73.
  12. Charles, J. F., Collin, F. B. (2001). Frame semantics for text understanding. In Proc of the NAACL-01 Workshop on WordNet and Other Lexical Resources. Available: http://www.ccs.neu.edu/course/csg224/resources/framenet/framenet.pdf

Downloads

Published

2015-01-29

How to Cite

Крисилов, В. А., Марулин, С. Ю., & Ал Асвад, С. (2015). Comparative analysis of methods and information models of structuring information in educational process. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 1(2(21), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2015.37613

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 2(21) (2015): Information technology

Section

Information Technologies: Original Research

License

Copyright (c) 2016 Виктор Анатольевич Крисилов, Станислав Юрьевич Марулин, Салех Ал Асвад

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.