Division model of team-building alternatives for IT-companies

Authors

  • Ольга Григорівна Мельник Educational and Research Institute of Economics and Management, National University "Lviv Polytechnic", 5, Mytropolyta Andreya str., Lvіv, 79046, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8819-1910
  • Юрій Несторович Шпак Educational and Research Institute of Economics and Management, National University "Lviv Polytechnic", 5, Mytropolyta Andreya str., Lvіv, 79046, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3895-4139

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2015.42083

Keywords:

IT-company, division model, selection indicator of IT-team, teamwork phase, teamwork productivity

Abstract

The article argues priority of IT-industry development, the necessity of systematic consecutive team-building processes for IT-companies to maintain a high level of orders. It is established that the most appropriate option of IT-team selection is division- integrated approach using a combination of administrative, loyal indicator and the indicator of maximum benefits for IT-company. The model of gradual selection of personnel, not used in other projects, for IT-project vacancies is presented. The phases taking place in each new created team to achieve a coherent, effective and mutually agreed work with a high level of productivity are discussed. The peculiarities of each stage are characterized and advisability of team-building to facilitate exit from crisis stages is substantiated. 

Author Biographies

Ольга Григорівна Мельник, Educational and Research Institute of Economics and Management, National University "Lviv Polytechnic", 5, Mytropolyta Andreya str., Lvіv, 79046

Doctor of Sciences (Economics), Professor, Head of the Department

Department of Foreign Trade and Customs (FTC), 

Юрій Несторович Шпак, Educational and Research Institute of Economics and Management, National University "Lviv Polytechnic", 5, Mytropolyta Andreya str., Lvіv, 79046

Department of Foreign Trade and Customs (FTC)

References

  1. Blagodatskikh, V. A., Sereda, S. A., Poskakalov, K. F. (2007). Economical-legal Bases of Software Market. Moscow: Finansy i statistika, 240.
  2. McCarthy, J., McCarthy, M. (2002). Software for Your Head. Translated from English. Boston: Addison-Wesley Professional, 464.
  3. McCarthy, J., McCarthy, M. (2006). Dynamics of Software Development. Translated from English. Redmond: Microsoft Press, 199.
  4. Pilone, D., Miles, R. (2008). Head First Software Development. Cambridge: O’Reilly Media, 477.
  5. Skopin, I. N. (2004). Bases of Programming Projects Management. Moscow: INTUIT, 336.
  6. Cherepakha, G. S. (2006). The product-environmental approach to the project team management. Kyiv: National University of Construction and Architecture, 177.
  7. Dyer, W. G. (1994). Team Building: Current Issues and New Alternatives. Ed. 3. Boston: Addison-Wesley, 154.
  8. Brooks, F. P. (1995). The Mythical Man-Month: Essays on Software Engineering. Boston: Addison-Wesley, 336.
  9. Semenyshyn, V., Oleksiv, I. (2013). Theoretical approaches to communications management in IT industry of Ukraine. Econtechmod. An International Quarterly Journal on Economics in Technology, New Technologies and Modelling Processes, Vol. 2, 4, 67-72.
  10. Tuckman, B. W., Jensen, M. A. C. (1977, December 1). Stages of Small-Group Development Revisited. Group & Organization Management, Vol. 2, № 4, 419–427. doi:10.1177/105960117700200404
  11. Yourdon, E. (1997). Death March: The Complete Software Developer's Guide to Surviving "Mission Impossible" Projects. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 218.

Published

2015-05-28

How to Cite

Мельник, О. Г., & Шпак, Ю. Н. (2015). Division model of team-building alternatives for IT-companies. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 3(5(23), 11–15. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2015.42083