Analysis of scientific approaches to research of convergence theories

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2015.47493

Keywords:

scientific and theoretical approaches, convergence theory, territorial economies, rural border areas, convergence of territorial systems, ensuring sustainable development

Abstract

The scientific and theoretical approaches to the study of convergence theories are analyzed and summarized in the article. Feasibility of updating process of territorial convergence of economic systems with differential features of development is outlined. It is proved a necessity of developing a promising concept for the development of rural border areas, which will promote sustainable development based on the consideration of socio-economic, natural and environmental characteristics of the area. In this study the theories and concepts of convergence will enable to detect individual weaknesses and identify the causes affecting the efficiency of providing perspective development of rural border areas. It is proved that in order to ensure convergence processes of rural border areas must be considered above all productivity of land resources, because the land is an important part of rural development. It is proved a necessity of implementation of new approaches to the management of economic development that will promote regional convergence systems.

Author Biography

Леся Михайлівна Газуда, SHEI "Uzhhorod National University", st. University, 14, Uzhgorod, Ukraine, 88000

Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor

Department of Business Economy

References

  1. Smith, A. (2007). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Translated from English. M.: Eksmo, 282.
  2. Ricardo, D. (1995). The Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. Translated from English. M.: Ekonomika, 680.
  3. Hеckscher, E. F. (1919). The Effect of Foreign Trade on Distribution of Income. Blakiston Series of Republished Articles on Economics, 4, 386.
  4. Ohlin, B. (1933). Interregional and International Trade. Cambridge Mass: Harvard University Press, 174–187.
  5. Stolper, W. F., Samuelson, P. A. (1941, November 1). Protection and Real Wages. The Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 9, № 1, 58–73. doi:10.2307/2967638
  6. Leont'ev, V. (1997). Mezhotraslevaia ekonomika. M.: Ekonomika, 44–95.
  7. Solow, R. M. (1956, February). A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 70, № 1, 65–94.doi:10.2307/1884513
  8. Wicksell, K., Clark, J. B., Hobson, J. A. (1902). The Distribution of Wealth. A Theory of Wages, Interest and Profits. Ekonomisk Tidskrift, Vol. 4, 85–90. doi:10.2307/3437091
  9. Halchynskyi, A. S. (2014). Konverhentnyi rynok – metodolohiia perspektyvy. Ekonomika Ukrainy, 1 (626), 4–20.
  10. Dorohuntsov, S. I., Zaiats, T. A., Pitiurenko, Yu. I. et al.; In: Dorohuntsov, S. I. (2005). Rozmishchennia produktyvnykh syl i rehionalna ekonomika. K.: KNEU, 988.
  11. Siebert, H. (1969). Regional Economic Growth Theory and Policy. Scranton, 1223.
  12. Hamel, G., Prahalad, C. K. (1994). Competing for the Future. Harvard Business Publishing. Available: https://hbr.org/1994/07/competing-for-the-future
  13. Porter, M.; Translated from English: Shchetinin, V. D. (1993). International competition. M.: Mezhdunar. otnosheniia, 896.
  14. Porter, M. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: The Free Press, 592.
  15. Gordon, I. R. (1985, April). The cyclical sensitivity of regional employment and unemployment differentials. Regional Studies, Vol. 19, № 2, 95–110. doi:10.1080/09595238500185111
  16. Storonianska, I. (2009). Mizhrehionalni intehratsiini protsesy v Ukraini: tendentsii ta perspektyvy rozvytku. Lviv: IRD NAN Ukrainy, 392.
  17. Shnypko, O. S. (2003). Natsionalna konkurentospromozhnist: sutnist, problemy, mekhanizmy realizatsii. K.: Nauk. dumka, 334.
  18. Panchyshyn, S. M. (2004). Makroekonomichnyi analiz tovarnoi formy vyrobnytstva. Lviv: LNU im. I. Franka, 380.
  19. Miuller-Armak, A. (1999). Printsipy sotsial'nogo rynochnogo hoziaistva. Sotsial'noe rynochnoe hoziaistvo. Teoriia i etika ekonomicheskogo poriadka v Rossii i Germanii. SPb.: Ekonomicheskaia shkola, 368.
  20. Miuller-Armak, A. (1996). O svobode i sotsial'noi spravedlivosti. Predlozheniia po osushchestvleniiu sotsial'noi rynochnoi ekonomiki. Sotsial'noe rynochnoe hoziaistvo. Politekonom, 1, 57.
  21. Zvieriakov, M. I. (2013). U poshukakh vykhodu z kryzy. Ekonomika Ukrainy, 8 (621), 4–21.
  22. Slovar' sovremennoi ekonomicheskoi teorii Makmillana. (1997). M.: INFRA – M., 607.
  23. Zverev, D. V., Kolomak, E. A. (2010). Subfederal'naia fiskal'naia politika v Rossii: mezhregional'nye razlichiia i sviazi. Nauchnye doklady: nezavisimyi ekonomicheskii analiz, 209, 102.
  24. Nureev, R. (2000). Teorii razvitiia: novye modeli ekonomicheskogo rosta (vklad chelovecheskogo kapitala). Voprosy ekonomiki, 9, 126–145.
  25. Vakhovych, I. M., Ropotan, I. V. (2014). Rehionalna konverhentsiia finansovoho zabezpechennia staloho rozvytku Ukrainy. Lutsk: Volynpolihraftm, 219.
  26. Kholod, N. M. (2009). Rozpodil dokhodiv ta bidnist u perekhidnykh ekonomikakh. Lviv: Vydavnychyi tsentr LNTU im. I. Franka, 442.
  27. Martin, R. (2001, January 1). EMU versus the regions? Regional convergence and divergence in Euroland. Journal of Economic Geography, Vol. 1, № 1, 51–80. doi:10.1093/jeg/1.1.51

Published

2015-07-23

How to Cite

Газуда, Л. М. (2015). Analysis of scientific approaches to research of convergence theories. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 4(5(24), 75–79. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2015.47493