Analysis of scientific approaches to research of convergence theories
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2015.47493Keywords:
scientific and theoretical approaches, convergence theory, territorial economies, rural border areas, convergence of territorial systems, ensuring sustainable developmentAbstract
The scientific and theoretical approaches to the study of convergence theories are analyzed and summarized in the article. Feasibility of updating process of territorial convergence of economic systems with differential features of development is outlined. It is proved a necessity of developing a promising concept for the development of rural border areas, which will promote sustainable development based on the consideration of socio-economic, natural and environmental characteristics of the area. In this study the theories and concepts of convergence will enable to detect individual weaknesses and identify the causes affecting the efficiency of providing perspective development of rural border areas. It is proved that in order to ensure convergence processes of rural border areas must be considered above all productivity of land resources, because the land is an important part of rural development. It is proved a necessity of implementation of new approaches to the management of economic development that will promote regional convergence systems.
References
- Smith, A. (2007). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Translated from English. M.: Eksmo, 282.
- Ricardo, D. (1995). The Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. Translated from English. M.: Ekonomika, 680.
- Hеckscher, E. F. (1919). The Effect of Foreign Trade on Distribution of Income. Blakiston Series of Republished Articles on Economics, 4, 386.
- Ohlin, B. (1933). Interregional and International Trade. Cambridge Mass: Harvard University Press, 174–187.
- Stolper, W. F., Samuelson, P. A. (1941, November 1). Protection and Real Wages. The Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 9, № 1, 58–73. doi:10.2307/2967638
- Leont'ev, V. (1997). Mezhotraslevaia ekonomika. M.: Ekonomika, 44–95.
- Solow, R. M. (1956, February). A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 70, № 1, 65–94.doi:10.2307/1884513
- Wicksell, K., Clark, J. B., Hobson, J. A. (1902). The Distribution of Wealth. A Theory of Wages, Interest and Profits. Ekonomisk Tidskrift, Vol. 4, 85–90. doi:10.2307/3437091
- Halchynskyi, A. S. (2014). Konverhentnyi rynok – metodolohiia perspektyvy. Ekonomika Ukrainy, 1 (626), 4–20.
- Dorohuntsov, S. I., Zaiats, T. A., Pitiurenko, Yu. I. et al.; In: Dorohuntsov, S. I. (2005). Rozmishchennia produktyvnykh syl i rehionalna ekonomika. K.: KNEU, 988.
- Siebert, H. (1969). Regional Economic Growth Theory and Policy. Scranton, 1223.
- Hamel, G., Prahalad, C. K. (1994). Competing for the Future. Harvard Business Publishing. Available: https://hbr.org/1994/07/competing-for-the-future
- Porter, M.; Translated from English: Shchetinin, V. D. (1993). International competition. M.: Mezhdunar. otnosheniia, 896.
- Porter, M. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: The Free Press, 592.
- Gordon, I. R. (1985, April). The cyclical sensitivity of regional employment and unemployment differentials. Regional Studies, Vol. 19, № 2, 95–110. doi:10.1080/09595238500185111
- Storonianska, I. (2009). Mizhrehionalni intehratsiini protsesy v Ukraini: tendentsii ta perspektyvy rozvytku. Lviv: IRD NAN Ukrainy, 392.
- Shnypko, O. S. (2003). Natsionalna konkurentospromozhnist: sutnist, problemy, mekhanizmy realizatsii. K.: Nauk. dumka, 334.
- Panchyshyn, S. M. (2004). Makroekonomichnyi analiz tovarnoi formy vyrobnytstva. Lviv: LNU im. I. Franka, 380.
- Miuller-Armak, A. (1999). Printsipy sotsial'nogo rynochnogo hoziaistva. Sotsial'noe rynochnoe hoziaistvo. Teoriia i etika ekonomicheskogo poriadka v Rossii i Germanii. SPb.: Ekonomicheskaia shkola, 368.
- Miuller-Armak, A. (1996). O svobode i sotsial'noi spravedlivosti. Predlozheniia po osushchestvleniiu sotsial'noi rynochnoi ekonomiki. Sotsial'noe rynochnoe hoziaistvo. Politekonom, 1, 57.
- Zvieriakov, M. I. (2013). U poshukakh vykhodu z kryzy. Ekonomika Ukrainy, 8 (621), 4–21.
- Slovar' sovremennoi ekonomicheskoi teorii Makmillana. (1997). M.: INFRA – M., 607.
- Zverev, D. V., Kolomak, E. A. (2010). Subfederal'naia fiskal'naia politika v Rossii: mezhregional'nye razlichiia i sviazi. Nauchnye doklady: nezavisimyi ekonomicheskii analiz, 209, 102.
- Nureev, R. (2000). Teorii razvitiia: novye modeli ekonomicheskogo rosta (vklad chelovecheskogo kapitala). Voprosy ekonomiki, 9, 126–145.
- Vakhovych, I. M., Ropotan, I. V. (2014). Rehionalna konverhentsiia finansovoho zabezpechennia staloho rozvytku Ukrainy. Lutsk: Volynpolihraftm, 219.
- Kholod, N. M. (2009). Rozpodil dokhodiv ta bidnist u perekhidnykh ekonomikakh. Lviv: Vydavnychyi tsentr LNTU im. I. Franka, 442.
- Martin, R. (2001, January 1). EMU versus the regions? Regional convergence and divergence in Euroland. Journal of Economic Geography, Vol. 1, № 1, 51–80. doi:10.1093/jeg/1.1.51
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Леся Михайлівна Газуда
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.