Creativity formation as the basis for development of intellectual potential of economic systems

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2016.65798

Keywords:

creativity, creative thinking, heuristics, ideas, ideas generation, trend analysis, expert and multivariate methods

Abstract

The concept of creativity is studied in the article as the ability to be creative in terms of cognitive and behavioral characteristics of individuals and a factor of forming intellectual potential of the enterprise. Special attention to the concept of individual creativity is determined by the stage of generating ideas about formation of intellectual property. Generating ideas appears as an "ideas funnel", which clearly reflects the generation, identification and evaluation of ideas. Factors of creative thinking that lead to the generation of ideas are identified. Attention is focused on basic concepts of heuristics science that studies the artistic and creative thinking. Models of ideas selection techniques for their generation in terms of statistics and expert opinion are given. Graphical relationship between the number of generated ideas and the value of spending on the process of identification and generation is shown as the final stage of research.

Author Biographies

Наталя Ігорівна Козьмук, Lviv Educational and Scientific Institute of SHEE «Banking University», 79005, Ukraine, Lviv, Shevchenko ave. 9

Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor

Department of Finance and the Financial and Economic Security

Оксана Ігорівна Кліпкова, Lviv Academy of Commerce, st. Tugan-Baranovskу 10, Lviv, Ukraine, 79005

PhD student

Department of Economic Theory

References

  1. Guilford, J. P. (1967). The Nature of Human Intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill, 538.
  2. Torrance, E. P. (1965). Rewarding creative behavior. Prentice-Hall, 353.
  3. Luk, A. N. (1978). Psykholohyia tvorchestva. Moscow: Nauka, 540.
  4. Maslow, A. (2006). Motyvatsyia y lychnost. Ed. 3. Saint Petersburg: Pyter, 352.
  5. Torrance, E. P.; In: Stemberg, R., Tardif, T. (1988). The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. The nature of creativity. Tufts University, 43–75.
  6. Korkosz-Gębska, J. (2014). Wybrane działania wspierające współpracę naukowców z przedsiębiorstwami jako przykład wzmocnienia powiązań nauka-biznes na Mazowszu. Przedsiębiorstwo we współczesnej gospodarce-teoria i praktyka, 2, 29–40.
  7. Yvyn, A. A., Nykyforov, A. (1997). Slovar po lohyke. Moscow: Tumanyt, VLADOS, 384.
  8. Klipkova, O. I. (2015). Kreatyvnist ta innovatsiinist yak osnovni skladovi novoho vektora v upravlinnia pidpryiemstvom. Naukoviy Visnyk Mukachivskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Seria Ekonomika, 2 (4), Part 2, 76–80.
  9. Rothwell, R. (1992). Successful industrial innovation: critical factors for the 1990s. R&D Management, 22 (3), 221–240. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.1992.tb00812.x
  10. Major, E. (2003). Technology transfer and innovation initiatives in strategic management: generating an alternative perspective. Industry and Higher Education, 17 (1), 21–27. doi:10.5367/000000003101296639
  11. Volot, O. I. (2012). Oblik yak osnova informatsiinoho zabezpechennia upravlinnia pidpryiemstvamy. Naukovyi visnyk Chernihivskoho derzhavnoho instytutu ekonomiky i upravlinnia. Seriia Ekonomika, 1, 214–217.
  12. Kardash, V. Ya., Pavlenko, I. A., Shafaliuk, O. K. (2002). Tovarna innovatsiina polityka. Kyiv: KNEU, 266.
  13. Barron, F.; In: Stemberg, R., Tardif, T. (1988). Putting creativity to work. The nature of creativity. Tufts University, 76–98.

Published

2016-03-29

How to Cite

Козьмук, Н. І., & Кліпкова, О. І. (2016). Creativity formation as the basis for development of intellectual potential of economic systems. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 2(5(28), 10–13. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2016.65798

Issue

Section

Economics and Enterprise Management: Original Research