Usage of «level of insecurity risk» indicator as criterion of decision making in department of enterprise economic security

Authors

  • Олена Вікторівна Ілляшенко Institute of Chemical Technologies of East Ukraine Volodymyr Dahl National University, Sovetskiy Avenue, 59A, Severodonetsk, 93406, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0691-9731

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2016.66003

Keywords:

enterprise, economic security, department of economic security, recommendations, security, insecurity, «level of insecurity risk» indicator

Abstract

System support of economic security is possible only in case of existence of economic security system at the enterprise. Form of objectification of such system is subdivision of enterprise economic security (department or division). Criteria of decision making in providing security for enterprise activity are important instruments among others instruments of department of enterprise economic security. One of such criteria is indicator «insecurity level». Its content is shown using antonymous notions «security» and «insecurity». Indicator «level of insecurity risk» should be calculated not only for objects of enterprise economic security system but in the process of making important managerial decisions by top management and owners of enterprise concerning enterprise activity. Applying method of profiling is considered to use suggested indicator «level of insecurity risk» in providing enterprise economic security. Methods of fuzzy logic are suggested to calculate value of insecurity risk levels. Algorithm of insecurity risk evaluation is shown using making profile of insecurity risk for supplier of material goods.

Author Biography

Олена Вікторівна Ілляшенко, Institute of Chemical Technologies of East Ukraine Volodymyr Dahl National University, Sovetskiy Avenue, 59A, Severodonetsk, 93406

Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor

Department of business economics and applied statistics

References

  1. Mak-Mak, V. P. (2003). Enterprise Security as a subject of private law enforcement. Moscow: Company «Sputnik+», 220.
  2. Syvolap, L. A. (2014). Sluzhba bezpeky pidpryyemstva yak chynnyk yoho ekonomichnoyi bezpeky. Teoretychni i praktychni aspekty ekonomiky ta intelektual'noyi vlasnosti, 2, 121‑125.
  3. Korolev, M. I. (2011). Sistema ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti predpriyatia. Moscow: Maska, 352.
  4. Kavun, S. V. (2014). Ekonomichna bezpeka pidpryyemstva: informatsiynyy aspekt. Kharkiv: TOV «Shchedra sadyba plyus», 312.
  5. Nashynets-Naumova, A. Yu. (2012). Pytannia zabezpechennia informatsiinoi bezpeky pidpryiemstva. Yurydychnyi visnyk, 3 (24), 58‑62.
  6. Hrydzhuk, H. S. (2009). Systematyzatsiia metodiv informatsiinoi bezpeky pidpryiemstva. Visnyk Natsionalnoho transportnoho universytetu, Vol. 19, Part 1, 1–4. Available: http://www.nbuv.gov.ua/old_jrn/natural/Vntu/2009_19_1/pdf/64.pdf. Last accessed: 18.03.2016.
  7. Anilovska, H. Ya. (2008). Informatsiina bezpeka pidpryiemstva v umovakh vykorystannia suchasnykh informatsiinykh tekhnolohii. Naukovyi visnyk NLTU Ukrainy, Vol. 18.9, 270–273. Available: http://www.nbuv.gov.ua/old_jrn/chem_biol/nvnltu/18_9/270_Anilowska_18_9.pdf. Last accessed: 18.03.2016.
  8. Lydon, J. C. (1987). The Deterrent Effect of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act. Journal of the Patent & Trademark Office Society, 69, 427‑444.
  9. Jager, M. F. (1997). A comparison of trade secret laws in Asia7. LES Nouvelles, 32 (2), 54‑59.
  10. Zaplatynskyi, V. (2012). Novoe opredelenie termina «opasnost'». PRACE NAUKOWE Akademii im. Jana Długosza w Cz SERIA: Edukacja Techniczna, Vol. VII. Available: http://www.pneti.ajd.czest.pl/docs/tom7/art/vz_a.pdf
  11. Kozachenko, H. V., Shulzhenko, L. E. (2014). Ekosesent: zmist, predmet ta struktura. Business Inform, 2, 8‑12.
  12. Illiashenko, O. (2015). Systema ekonomichnoyi bezpeky pidpryyemstva: zmist ta vlastyvosti. Virtus, 3, 125–129.
  13. Korzeniowski, L., Peplonski, A. (2005). Wywiad gospodarczy, historia i współczesność. Krakow: EAS, 244.
  14. Świniarski, J. (1997). O naturze bezpieczeństwa. Prolegomena do zagadnień ogólnych. Warszawa: Pruszków, 314.

Downloads

Published

2016-03-29

How to Cite

Ілляшенко, О. В. (2016). Usage of «level of insecurity risk» indicator as criterion of decision making in department of enterprise economic security. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 2(5(28), 42–48. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2016.66003

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 5(28) (2016): Technology transfer in the economics. Economics and management of enterprise

Section

Economics and Enterprise Management: Original Research

License

Copyright (c) 2016 Олена Вікторівна Ілляшенко

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.