Identification and quantitative expression of valuation uncertainty at the property market

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2016.76290

Keywords:

property market, error concept, uncertainty concept, subjective uncertainty, objective uncertainty

Abstract

The sources of objective, subjective and model valuation uncertainty at the property market are investigated. It is determined that the sources of objective uncertainty are the stochastic nature of the property market, incompleteness and inconsistency of market information. The sources of subjective uncertainty are a low level of analyst qualification and model uncertainty – inadequate valuation model or incorrect of chosen valuation method. It is proved that an approach to valuation of the quality of the results, which is based on the error concept, is deterministic, it is associated with the presence of errors (systematic and random) of measuring instruments and is the frequency interpretation of probability. In approach, which is based on the uncertainty concept, the uncertainty of results is associated exclusively with the measurement process, and not with the measuring instruments. It is a subjective interpretation of probability, which characterizes the degree of confidence. It is proved that the use of more appropriate pricing models makes it possible to understand the complex risks and their impact on management decisions at the property market, but not eliminates an uncertainty.

Author Biography

Uliia Kalynichenko, Lviv Polytechnic National University, Stepana Bandery 12, Lviv, 79013

Candidate of Economic Sciences

Department of cadastre of territories

References

  1. Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit. New York: Harper and Row, 381.
  2. Voronin, V. O., Liantse, E. V., Mamchyn, M. M. (2014). Analityka rynku nerukhomosti: metodolohiia ta pryntsypy suchasnoi otsinky. Lviv: Mahnoliia 2006, 304.
  3. Gribovskii, S. V., Barinov, N. P., Anisimova, I. N. (2002). O povyshchenii dostovernosti otsenki rynochnoi stoimosti metodom sravnitel'nogo analisa. Voprosy otsenki, 1, 2–10.
  4. Anisimova, I. N., Barinov, N. P., Gribovskii, S. V. (2004). Uchet rasnotipnyh tsenoobrasuiushih faktorov v mnogomarnyh regressionnyh modeliah otsenki nedvizhimosti. Voprosy otsenki, 2, 2–15.
  5. Gribovskii, S. V., Sivets, S. A., Levykina, I. A. (2002). Novye vosmozhnosti sravnitel'nogo podhoda pri reshchenii staryh problem. Voprosy otsenki, 4, 22–29.
  6. Sivets, S. A. (2001). Postroenie i prakticheskoe primenenie mnogofaktornoi gibridnoi modeli otsenki dohodnoi nedvizhimosti. Voprosy otsenki, 4, 27–36.
  7. Leifer, L. A. (2013). Harakteristiki tochnosti i neopredelennosti otsenki. Modeli i metody ih opredeleniia. Privolzhskii tsentr finansovogo konsaltinga i otsenki. Available: http://www.appraiser.ru/UserFiles/File/Conference/ROO-06-2013/docs/Leyfer.pdf
  8. Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM): First edition. (1993). Switzerland: ISO, 101.
  9. Puzanka, S. O. (2008). Mizhnarodni standarty otsinky. Ed. 8. Translation from English. Kyiv: ArtEk, 432.
  10. Pro zatverdzhennia Natsionalnoho standartu № 1 «Zahalni zasady otsinky maina i mainovykh prav». Decree of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine from 10.09.2003 № 1440. Available: http://zakon5.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1440-2003-п
  11. Report of the Financial Stability Forum on Enhancing Market and Institutional Resilience. (2008, April 7). Financial Stability Forum. Available: http://www.financialstabilityboard.org/wp-content/uploads/r_0804.pdf?page_moved=1
  12. IFRS 13 – Fair Value Measurement. Deloitte Global Services Limited. Available: http://www.iasplus.com/en/standards/ifrs/ifrs13
  13. Harris, I., Mainelli, M., Onstwedder, J.-P. (2012, July). Confidence accounting: a proposal: A joint paper from ACCA, the Chartered Institute for Securities and Investment and Long Finance. London: ACCA, CISI and Long Finance. Available: http://www.zyen.com/PDF/Confidence%20Accounting1.pdf
  14. Valuation Uncertainty: Discussion Paper. International Valuation Standards Council. Available: https://www.ivsc.org/
  15. JCGM 200:2012 (E/F). International vocabulary of metrology – Basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM). Ed. 3, version with minor corrections. (2008). Available: http://www.bipm.org/utils/common/documents/jcgm/JCGM_200_2012.pdf
  16. Brillouin, L.; In: Kusnetsova, T. A. (2006). Nauchnaia neopredelennost' i informatsiia. Ed. 2. Translation from English. Moscow: KomKniga, 272.
  17. Rehman, U. J.; In: Shchundeev, V. M. (1969). Primenenie statistiki. Translation from English. Moscow: Statistika, 296.
  18. DSTU-N 2681-94. Metrolohiia. Terminy ta vyznachennia. (1994). Kyiv: Derzhstandart Ukrainy, 68.
  19. Ursul, A. D. (1975). Problema informatsii v sovremennoi nauke. Filosofskie ocherki. Moscow: Nauka, 300.
  20. Shchreider, Yu. A. (1966). Nekotorye problemy teorii nauchnoi informatsii. NTI, 6, 16–19.
  21. JCGM 100:2008. Evaluation of measurement data Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM 1995 with minor corrections): First edition. (2008). Switzerland: ISO, 121.

Downloads

Published

2016-07-26

How to Cite

Kalynichenko, U. (2016). Identification and quantitative expression of valuation uncertainty at the property market. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 4(5(30), 13–17. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2016.76290

Issue

Section

Economics and Enterprise Management: Original Research