Development of mathematical model of decision making based on analysis of values of stakeholders
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2017.93461Keywords:
stakeholder value of the project, objective function of decision-making, project artifactsAbstract
The values are one of the key concepts used in modern project management methodologies. Decision-making in the project without the participation and attention to the values of stakeholders leads to a failure in the projects.
The study describes the value of an interested party of the project as a set of indicators to assess its condition. The mathematical description of stakeholder relations to values is proposed. Based on the description of the relationship to the values, the objective function of maximizing the degree of security of the entire set of stakeholder values is proposed. Tangible and intangible assets owned or wanted to own by the interested party are presented as artifacts affecting the degree of security of stakeholder values. A formula is proposed for evaluating priority of artifacts resulting from stakeholder participation in projects.
An approach to the assessment of the current degree of security stakeholder values is proposed. The mathematical description is proposed for the portfolio of projects and programs, which involved stakeholders in order to maximize the level of security of their valuables. A description of the project is made as a process of transformation of artifacts owned by the interested party in the artifacts that it would like to own. The target decision-making function is given to change the portfolio in order to obtain the maximum level to ensure stakeholder value.
Recommendations for project leaders on the formation of values are given. Decomposing the project taking into account the priority of the artifacts, project manager provides the support of key stakeholders.
References
- A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide). Ed. 5. (2013). Project Management Institute, 590.
- P2M «Program & Project Management for Enterprise Innovation». (2016). Project Management Association of Japan. Available: http://www.pmaj.or.jp/ENG/p2m/p2m_guide/p2m_guide.html
- The Standard for Portfolio Management. Ed. 3. (2013). Project Management Institute, 189.
- The Standard for Program Management. Ed. 3. (2013). Project Management Institute, 176.
- Yaroshenko, N. (2012). System «shared values» as a community project intergrator. Management of Development of Complex Systems, 10, 83–86.
- Chimshir, V. (2016). Numerical evaluation of the value of project activity product. Management of Development of Complex Systems, 25, 80–85.
- Grigorian, T. G., Shatkovskij, L. Y. (2016). Models of making decision processes at the value-oriented requirements management in IТ-projects. Project management and development of production, 2 (58), 81–98.
- Bushuyev, S., Bushueva, N., Yaroshenko, F. (2012). Harmonization models property development programme in turbulence environment. Management of Development of Complex Systems, 10, 9–13.
- Bushuyev, S., Haritonov, D. (2010). Tsennostnyi podhod v upravlenii razvitiem slozhnyh sistem. Management of Development of Complex Systems, 1, 10–15.
- Yaroshenko, R., Yaroshenko, T. (2012). Core values formation in development program of financial institutions. Management of Development of Complex Systems, 10, 102–105.
- Muller, R., Zhai, L., Wang, A. (2017). Governance and governmentality in projects: Profiles and relationships with success. International Journal of Project Management. Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263786317300583. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.01.007
- Maheswari, J. U., Charlesraj, V. P. C., Goyal, A., Mujumdar, P. (2015). Application of Relationship Diagramming Method (RDM) for Resource-constrained Scheduling of Linear Construction Projects. Procedia Engineering, 123, 308–315. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2015.10.095
- Mok, K. Y., Shen, G. Q., Yang, J. (2015). Stakeholder management studies in mega construction projects: A review and future directions. International Journal of Project Management, 33 (2), 446–457. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.08.007
- Maslow, A. H. (1987). Motivation and Personality. Ed. 3. Longman, 336.
- Kyazimov, V. O. (2014). Determination of components value of goods for human. Historical and social-educational ideas, 5 (27), 161–166.
- Oberemok, I. (2015). Approaches of development of the corporate project management system. Management of Development of Complex Systems, 15, 49–52.
- Oberemok, I. (2014). Flexible approach to the implementation of corporate project management system. Management of Development of Complex Systems, 17, 42–45.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Иван Иванович Оберемок, Наталья Васильевна Оберемок
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.