Improvement of the essence of professional judgment in accounting of Ukraine

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2017.98277

Keywords:

International Financial Reporting Standards, International Standards on Auditing, professional accountant judgment, uncertainty condition

Abstract

The article analyzes the approaches to defining the essence of professional judgment on the basis of international and Ukrainian legislation in the field of accounting. Classification of scientific approaches for judgment of an accountant is defined, in particular: situational, targeted and professional. The main aim of the article is to provide practical recommendations on the author's definition of the essence of the professional judgment of an accountant and its implementation in the Law of Ukraine «On Accounting and Financial Reporting in Ukraine» and National Accounting Standards. Using the methods of induction and deduction, analysis and synthesis, the method of consistency, the article proposes, under the professional judgment of an accountant, to understand the formed judgment in the conditions of uncertainty based on the professional knowledge and skills of the accountant, which is proposed in the absence of a legislative and normative document that will describe the accounting methodology of the corresponding accounting object, the availability of methodological alternatives for its management or direct indication of the application of such judgment in the formation of credibility reporting that will be used by stakeholders to make informed decisions.

Author Biography

Ivan Derun, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 90 A, Vasylkivska str., Kyiv, Ukraine, 03022

PhD, Assistant Professor

Department of Accounting and Audit

References

  1. International Accounting Standard 1. Presentation of Financial Statements. (2011, February 18). Available: http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/accounting/docs/consolidated/ias1_en.pdf. Last accessed: 26.02.2017.
  2. IAS 8. Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors. (2012, January 1). Available: http://www.ifrs.org/Documents/IAS8.pdf. Last accessed: 26.02.2017.
  3. Conceptual Framework of Financial Reporting. (2015, October 26). Available: http://www.ifrs.org/Current-Projects/IASB-Projects/Conceptual-Framework/Documents/May%202015/ED_CF_MAY%202015.pdf. Last accessed: 26.02.2017.
  4. Handbook of International Quality Control, Auditing, Review, Other Assurance, and Related Services Pronouncements. (2015). International Federation of Accountants. Available: https://www.ifac.org/publications-resources/2015-handbook-international-quality-control-auditing-review-other-assurance. Last accessed: 26.02.2017.
  5. Pro bukhhalterskyi oblik ta finansovu zvitnist v Ukraini. Law of Ukraine from 16.07.1999 № 996-XIV. Available: http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/996-14. Last accessed: 26.02.2017.
  6. Pro zatverdzhennia Metodychnykh rekomendatsii shchodo oblikovoi polityky pidpryiemstva ta vnesennia zmin do deiakykh nakaziv Ministerstva finansiv Ukrainy. Order of the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine on June 27, 2013 № 635. Available: http://www.minfin.gov.ua/control/uk/publish/article%3Fart_id=364675&cat_id=36349. Last accessed: 26.02.2017.
  7. Dai, X. (2010). Study on Relative Problems about the Accountant Professional Judgment Ability. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 2 (3), 72–75. doi:10.5539/ijef.v2n3p72
  8. Flanagan, J., Clarke, K. (2007). Beyond a Code of Professional Ethics: A Holistic Model of Ethical Decision-Making for Accountants. Abacus, 43 (4), 488–518. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6281.2007.00242.x
  9. Kulikova, L. I., Grigoryeva, L. L., Gubaidullina, A. R. (2014). The Interrelation between the Professional Judgment of the Accountant and the Quality of Financial Reporting. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5 (24), 61–64. doi:10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n24p61
  10. Kulikova, L. I., Gubaidullina, A. R. (2015). Professional'noe suzhdenie buhgaltera kak instrument formirovaniia finansovoi otchetnosti. Moscow: Prospekt, 128.
  11. Petrova, I., Piskunova, N. (2012). Vplyv profesiinoho sudzhennia bukhhaltera na oblikovu polityku pidpryiemstva. Bulletin of Student Scientific Society, 2 (4), 267–271.
  12. Pushkar, M. S., Shchyrba, M. T. (2009). Teoriia i praktyka formuvannia oblikovoi polityky. Ternopil: Kart-blansh, 260.
  13. Synytsia, T. V. (2013). Neobkhidnist ta ymovirni ryzyky zastosuvannia profesiinoho sudzhennia bukhhaltera v oblikovii praktytsi. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu im. S. H. Skovorody. Ekonomika, 13, 208–212.
  14. Smirnova, E. A. (2012). Accountant’s professional opinion: concept, matter and content. Theory and practice of social development, 10, 291–294.
  15. Stafievskaya, M. V. (2014). Risk accounting in commercial organizations. International Accounting, 35 (329), 16–29.
  16. Tuyakova, Z. S., Satalkina, E. V. (2010). Classification of professional opinion as a modern instrument of accounting. Bulletin of the State University Orenburg, 1 (107), 90–97.
  17. Yukhymenko-Nazarchuk, I. A. (2014). Osoblyvosti zastosuvannia profesiinoho sudzhennia bukhhaltera v umovakh formuvannia oblikovoi polityky pidpryiemstva: instytutsiinyi aspekt. Problemy teorii ta metodolohii bukhhalterskoho obliku, kontroliu i analizu. Ser.: Bukhhalterskyi oblik, kontrol i analiz, 2 (29), 195–206.
  18. Boyko, K., Derun, I. (2016). Disclosure of Non-Financial Information in Corporate Social Reporting as a Strategy for Improving Management Effectiveness. Journal of International Studies, 9 (3), 159–177.
  19. Derun, I. (2016). Risk identification in the company’s accounting system. Economic Annals-ХХI, 159 (5-6), 97–100. doi:10.21003/ea.v159-21
  20. G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines. Available: https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRIG4-Part1-Reporting-Principles-and-Standard-Disclosures.pdf. Last accessed: 26.02.2017.

Downloads

Published

2017-03-30

How to Cite

Derun, I. (2017). Improvement of the essence of professional judgment in accounting of Ukraine. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 2(4(34), 25–29. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2017.98277

Issue

Section

Economics and Enterprise Management: Original Research