Submissions

Login or Register to make a submission.

Submission Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.
  • All requirements for the technical design of the text, including requirements for tables, figures, formulas, references in the text of the article, preparation of the list of references, provision of full information about the authors, etc., according to the rules for the author guidelines, have been met.
  • All requirements for the substantive part of the article, including compliance with the structure of the manuscript and its content according to the rules for the author guidelines, have been met.
  • The manuscript is not under consideration in any other journal, conference, etc.
  • The material of the manuscript is unique and has not been published previously in whole or in part in the language in which the manuscript is sent to the editorial office of the "Technology audit and production reserves", as well as in any other language.
  • All authors of the manuscript have read its content. No copyrights have been violated. All authors of the article meet the authorship criteria.
  • Any conflict of interest is indicated in the text of the manuscript in the appropriate section.
  • Artificial intelligence was not used to write any of the substantive parts of the manuscript. Any use of artificial intelligence for technical tasks (e.g., grammar checking, etc.) was additionally checked by a human from among the authors of the manuscript and indicated in the appropriate section of the manuscript text.
  • Any use of artificial intelligence is indicated in the text of the manuscript in the appropriate section.
  • The authors of the manuscript have read the publisher's policy and these terms and conditions, which are listed on the "General Terms and Conditions" page.
  • The authors have read the terms and conditions of payment for publication.

Author Guidelines

Basic conditions

The manuscript can be sent to the editorial office of the journal only if the following conditions are met:

  • the research was conducted with the highest standards of care and conscientiousness;
  • the manuscript is original and has not been published anywhere else, including by the authors of the manuscript;
  • the work has not been submitted anywhere else and is not reviewed with any other publication;
  • the work does not contain defamatory, discreditable or illegal statements;
  • allowed to use any third-party materials;
  • confirmation of consent has been obtained from all specified persons or organizations;
  • authorship was agreed prior to submission, and no one was “gifted” with authorship or refused to be credited as an author (ghostly authorship);
  • The author(s) has/have read and agrees to the General Terms and Conditions of the Terms of Publication

If your research is published and we find that any of these conditions have not been met, we may take action in accordance with COPE guidelines, which may result in one of the correction notices, or we may remove or revoke the article.

Additions and additional materials

If there are figures in the article, the authors must choose the main figure that reflects the results obtained. This figure will be placed at the title of the article in the archive of the journal.
Drawing requirements:

  • format .jpg, .jpeg, .png
  • resolution not less than 300 dpi
  • size no more than 5 Mb

Also, electronic additional materials for the article at the request of the authors (Excel files, audio and video files) can be published.

 

Requirements for the text

Font – Times New Roman
Font size – 14
Interval – 1
Margins of the document – 20 mm
Number of pages – min 12
Article language: English.
Ukrainian authors can submit their manuscripts for consideration in both English and Ukrainian. After acceptance of the article by the reviewers, authors of Ukrainian articles are given time to translate the article into English or can use the translation service provided by the editorial office.

 

I. REQUIRMENTS FOR ARTICLES

Required manuscript structure:

UDC for articles of technical and economic sciences

JEL Classification for economic science articles only

Title of the article in English

First name Last name in English

Summary

Keywords

  1. Introduction
  2. Material and Method
  3. Results and Discussion
  4. Conclusions

Acknowledgments (optional)

Conflict of interest

It is necessary to indicate the absence or presence of a conflict of interest. If there is a conflict of interest, it must be specified.
When there is no conflict of interest, it is necessary to specify the phrase:
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest in relation to this research, whether financial, personal, authorship or otherwise, that could affect the research and its results presented in this paper. 

Financing

Sources of funding must be indicated. If there is no funding, it is necessary to indicate:
The study was performed without financial support.

Data availability

Choose one of the options and indicate it in the text of the manuscript:

  • Manuscript has associated data in a data repository.
  • Manuscript has data included as electronic supplementary material.
  • Data will be made available on reasonable request.
  • Data cannot be made available for reasons disclosed in the data availability statement.
  • Manuscript has no associated data.

Use of artificial intelligence

Choose one of the options and indicate it in the text of the manuscript:

  1. If AI was not used, indicate the phrase: The authors confirm that they did not use artificial intelligence technologies in creating the submitted work.
  2. If AI was used, it must be declared in accordance with the editorial policy according to the scheme:
    – model and number of AI,
    – where exactly it was used (in which section of the article),
    – what exactly was done using AI tools (specific description),
    – how the authors checked the results provided by AI tools,
    – how the result provided by the AI tool influenced the conclusions of the study.

Authors' contributions

Indicate the author's contribution according to CRediT (Author Role Taxonomy) in the format:
Author1 first name last name: contribution1, contribution2, contribution3; Author2 first name last name: contribution1, contribution2, contribution3

References (at least 10 sources of literature)

The percentage of self-citation should not exceed 30% (i.e. if you used 10 references, no more than 3 of them can be to your work)

 

Sections of the article: Recommendation

Sections of the article

Recommendation

Summary

The Summary must contain 1800–1900 characters and should be based on the following scheme:

  • Object of research.
  • The problem to be solved.
  • The essence of the results.
  • What explains these results.
  • Under what conditions they can be used in practice.
Keywords

Keywords should be informative in terms of the possibility of identifying this article by search and indexing resources.

1. Introduction

The Introduction should be based on the following scheme:

  • Relevance rationales are arguments that scientific research on a given topic is important for modernity and that the results of such research are important for practice.
  • A critical analysis of the literature should point to an existing problem that has not yet been resolved. From this analysis, the need for the purpose of the author's research should follow.
  • At the end of this section of the article, it is necessary to formulate the aim of the study.

The formulation of the aim consists of two parts: scientific and practical.

The scientific part includes what indicates a solution to the problem: identifying some regularities, identifying the influence of something on something, identifying the mechanism of such and such a process, developing a model (method, etc.), developing application techniques such and such methods for ... etc.

The practical part includes what indicates the expectations from the practical use of the results for example: This will make it possible to…

2. Materials and methods

In this section, it is necessary to say about  object of research and about how the research was carried out: equipment, software (if used), theoretical methods, experimental conditions. That is, this section talks about how exactly the results were obtained. No need to report results.

3. Results and Discussion

Results are given in the form of figures, tables, final formulas.

Discussion should include:

  • Interpretation of the results (what explains the results?)
  • What is their difference from those known from the literature or from practical experience?
  • Practical relevance. It is necessary to indicate exactly how the results obtained during the study can be applied in practice. The scope of application is not limited and independently distinguished by authors based on the characteristics of the study.
  • Research limitations. A limitation is something that, in the conditions of conducting your research, is an objective reality that affects the results obtained.
  • The impact of martial law conditions. It is necessary to indicate exactly how the conditions of martial law in Ukraine influenced the conduct of the study and/or the results obtained. These may be certain restrictions, the impact of changes in the education system, legislative changes, changes in learning conditions (distance education), etc. For authors from other countries, this item is not mandatory but can be indicated if similar conditions are present in the country where the study was conducted.
  • Prospects for further research.
4. Conclusion

Conclusions should contain the following information:

  • What are the results obtained (brief essence)?
  • What explains these results (brief interpretation)?
  • How can these results be useful (theoretically and/or practically)?
  • Quantitative evaluations of results and/or comparative evaluations are desirable if available.

 

Requirements for registration information about the authors

For each author

First name, Last name

Corresponding author

Science degree

Department

University/Work

Work address (university, etc.)

E-mail: ….

Phone: ….

ORCID: …..

 

First name, Last name

Science degree

Department

University/Work

Work address (university, etc.)

E-mail: ….

Phone: ….

ORCID: ….

II. Before submitting a manuscript to the editorial office, authors are requested to check themselves using the checklist.
Download checklist

III. SUBMISSION TO THE EDITOR

Submit a paper to the editors You can of ways
1. Send to e-mail: tapr@entc.com.ua or tarp.nauka@gmail.com
2. Post an article on-line through the platform OJS (Open Journal System)

When submitting a manuscript to the editor, please send a letter to the e-mail: tapr@entc.com.ua or tarp.nauka@gmail.com as follows:

Dear Editors!
 
Please find attached the original research article "______________________________________________________________________" written by authors ____________________________________________________ for your kind consideration for publication.
All authors have read and approved this variant of the paper. No part of it has been published or presented elsewhere. The authors have no conflicts of interest related to the research described in the manuscript. The authors of ______________________________, by submitting the manuscript to the Editorial Office of the «Technology audit and production reserves», agree to all the requirements regarding the design, submission of the manuscript of the paper, payment, General Terms and Conditions,  and are fully responsible in case of violation of these requirements.
 
We look forward to receiving comments from reviewers.
 
On behalf of all the authors of this manuscript,
_____________________________________
(First name, Last name, degree, phone)
This contact person must be specified in clause 10.2. of the License Agreement

The author (team of authors) submitting the manuscript to the editorial office of the «Technology audit and production reserves» journal agrees with all requirements for registration, submission of the manuscript of the article and payment and be responsible in case of violation of these requirements.

IV. REVIEWING*

Deadline 30-40 days
1. Once you submit your article, it will be sent for review. Our editorial staff is practicing a double-blind peer review

* Review procedure involves checking for plagiarism, verification of compliance the article title and content, check the content of the article

2. Get response from reviewers. If there are corrections, it is necessary to take into account all the comments of the reviewers and send the revised article back by e-mail to tapr@entc.com.ua, tarp.nauka@gmail.com.
3. If there are no corrections or all the remarks made by the reviewers are corrected, the article will be accepted for publication in the journal based on the results of double-blind review.

V. PACKAGE OF DOCUMENTS FOR THE ARTICLE

is submitted by the authors to the editorial board after the first stage of verification – compliance of the submitted manuscript with the subject of the journal and verification of the uniqueness of the text (More details...)

Privacy Statement

The editorial board of the «Technology audit and production reserves» journal pay special attention to hold all information in confidence that comes to the editorial board and has not been published yet. The basic principles the editors follow:

  • All reviewers confirm the confidentiality of information with which they work up to the time of the paper publication.
  • If a reviewer needs help or advice of experts about a particular subject matter, the reviewers report to the editorial staff and get permission for such consultation.
  • The information, proposed by the authors to the editors, is not transferred to third parties.
  • All contact information (phone numbers and addresses), which the authors give to the editorial board, is used only by the editors and is not transferred to third parties.