Community analysis as socio-economic system: space-territorial nature, functions and features

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2018.124678

Keywords:

territorial community, social development, resource support, organizational support, administrative-territorial reform

Abstract

The object of research is society as a socio-economic system, its spatial-territorial nature, functions and characteristics. One of the most problematic places is that often there is inconsistency and lagging of the line ministries from the existing rates of decentralization and their response to specific uncertainties. In addition, the problem is personnel shortage in the newly unified territorial communities, there are not enough skilled workers to successfully advance the communities in development.

In the course of the study, methods were used: logical generalization, analogies, comparative comparison, analysis and synthesis. In particular, these methods have made it possible to identify through which some deficiencies can be eliminated through the legislative regulation of the formation of new communities.

A comprehensive analysis of the spatial-territorial nature and functions of the joint territorial communities is obtained. Recommendations are proposed for improving the legislative regulation of the association of territorial communities. In particular, let’s believe that it would be appropriate and justified to border communities of different regions with similar socio-economic factors to unite in one community. Let’s suggest that in the new Law "On the administrative and territorial structure of Ukraine" there be an article on the possibility of joining territorial units to existing communities, which inhabitants historically, territorially and culturally benefit from the benefits of the corresponding center of the community, but de jure is part of another area.

In comparison with similar well-known studies in the field of administrative-territorial reform and local self-government, this study provides an opportunity to comprehensively analyze society as a socio-economic system. In particular, due to the improvement of legislative regulation, it is possible to achieve a positive social and economic effect in the process of creating new unified territorial communities

Author Biography

Dmytro Savchuk, Ternopil National Economic University, 11, Lvivska str., Ternopil, Ukraine, 46020

Postgraduate Student

Department of Management and Public Administration

References

  1. Moroz, O. Yu. (2008). Terytorialna hromada: sutnist, stanovlennia ta suchasni ukrainski realii. Naukovyi visnyk «Demokratychne vriaduvannia», 2. Available at: http://lvivacademy.com/vidavnitstvo_1/visnik2/fail/Moroz.pdf
  2. Rozenfeld, Yu. N. (2004). Problemy udoskonalennia pravovoho rehuliuvannia mistsevoho samovriaduvannia v Ukraini. Kharkiv: In-t derzhavnoho budivnytstva ta mistsevoho samovriaduvannia APrN Ukrainy, 121–122.
  3. Mykhailyshyn, L. M. (2005). Mistseve samovriaduvannia v Ukraini: vynyknennia, rozvytok ta suchasni problem. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats LRIDU NADU. Efektyvnist derzhavnoho upravlinnia, 9, 391.
  4. Paneiko, Yu. I. (2002). Teoretychni osnovy samovriaduvannia. Lviv: Litopys, 196.
  5. Batanov, O. V., Voloshyn, Yu. O., Malikov, S. V. (2004). Statut terytorialnoi hromady: problemy teorii i praktyky. Kyiv: Instytut derzhavy i prava im. V. M. Koretskoho NANU; Mariupolskyi humanit. instytut, 17–18.
  6. Kovalenko, A. A. (2002). Teoriia i praktyka mistsevoho samovriaduvannia v Ukraini. Kyiv: Instytut derzhavy i prava im. V. M. Koretskoho NANU, 512.
  7. Evdokimov, V., Startsev, Ya. (2001). Mestnye organy vlasti zarubezhnykh stran: pravovye aspekty. Moscow: Spark, 251.
  8. Yarichevska, L. V. (2011). Mistseve samovriaduvannia v umovakh demokratii (porivnialnyi aspekt). Kharkiv: Pravo, 8.
  9. Barabashev, G. V. (1992). Mestnoe samoupravlenie – trudnoe ditya Rossii. Segodnya, 1, 7.
  10. Nehoda, V. A. (2015, December 3). Detsentralizatsiia vlady.Tsoho roku Ukraina vidkryla realni mozhlyvosti dlia rozbudovy mistsevoho samovriaduvannia. Available at: http://decentralization.gov.ua/news/item/id/1006. Last accessed: 20.01.2018.
  11. Midgley, J., Livermore, M. (1998). Social Capital and Local Economic Development: Implications for Community Social Work Practice. Journal of Community Practice, 5 (1–2), 29–40. doi:10.1300/j125v05n01_03
  12. Jaramillo Molina, M. E. (2015). The Effects of Economic Crises on Social Inequality. The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social and Community Studies, 9 (2), 13–31. doi:10.18848/2324-7576/cgp/v09i02/53533
  13. Bennett, N. J., Lemelin, R. H. (2013). Situating the eco-social economy: conservation initiatives and environmental organizations as catalysts for social and economic development. Community Development Journal, 49 (1), 69–84. doi:10.1093/cdj/bst017
  14. De Mello, L. (2012). Fiscal decentralization and public investment. Decentralization and Reform in Latin America, 112–139. doi:10.4337/9781781006269.00011
  15. Lublin, D. (2014). Ethnic Decentralization. Minority Rules, 271–291. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199948826.003.0009
  16. Eunjeong, K. (2015). A community approach for establishing the effective social care system. Korean Journal of Social Welfare Studies, 46 (2), 153–176. doi:10.16999/kasws.2015.46.2.153
  17. Lee, A., Kyonne, J. (2015). The Impact of Social Welfare System on Life Satisfaction. The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social and Community Studies, 9 (2), 13–20. doi:10.18848/2324-7576/cgp/v10i02/53476
  18. Faguet, J.-P., Poschl, C. (2015). Is Decentralization Good For Development? 1–28. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198737506.003.0001
  19. Sushynskyi, O. I. (2003). Mistseve samovriaduvannia v Ukraini: kontseptualni zasady statusu ta diialnosti vykonavchykh orhaniv. Lviv: PTVF «AFIShA», 176.
  20. Kovalenko, A. I. (2002). Rozvytok vykonavchoi vlady v Ukraini na suchasnomu etapi: teoriia i praktyka. Kyiv: Instytut derzhavy i prava im. V. M. Koretskoho, 512.
  21. Hanushchak, Yu. I.; Kuibidy, V. S. (Ed.) (2013). Terytorialna orhanizatsiia vlady: napriamky zmin. Lviv: Astroliabiia, 166.
  22. Pohorilko, V. F., Frytskyi, O. F. (2006). Munitsypalne pravo Ukrainy. Kyiv, 592.
  23. Pohorilko, V. F. (2010). Funktsii i povnovazhennia terytorialnykh hromad. Available at: pidruchniki.com/15660212/pravo/funktsiyi_povnovazhennya_teritorialnih_gromad
  24. Konstytutsiia Ukrainy. (1996, June 28). Zakon No. 254к/96-ВР. Verkhovna rada Ukrainy. Baza danykh «Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy». Available at: http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254к/96-вр. Last accessed: 20.01.2018.
  25. Konstytutsiini terytorialni hromady. (2016). Available at: http://terhromady.info/home/povnovazhennya-terytorialnoyi-hromady. Last accessed: 20.01.2018.
  26. Funktsii ta povnovazhennia. Tsentr perepidhotovky ta pidvyshchennia kvalifikatsii. (2015). Available at: www.cppk.cv.ua/i/2044348.doc. Last accessed: 20.01.2018.
  27. Batanov, O. V. (2008). Terytorialna hromada – pervynnyi subiekt munitsypalnoi vlady v Ukraini: poniattia ta oznaky. Visnyk Tsentralnoi vyborchoi komisii, 2 (12), 51–57.
  28. Pukhtynskyi, M. O., Tolkovanov, V. V. (2003). Yevropeiska khartiia mistsevoho samovriaduvannia ta rozvytok mistsevoi i rehionalnoi demokratii v Ukraini. Kyiv, 400.
  29. Pro zatverdzhennia Metodyky formuvannia spromozhnykh terytorialnykh hromad. (2015, April 8). Postanova Kabinety Ministriv Ukrainy No. 214. Baza danykh «Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy». Available at: http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/214-2015-п

Downloads

Published

2017-12-28

How to Cite

Savchuk, D. (2017). Community analysis as socio-economic system: space-territorial nature, functions and features. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 1(5(39), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2018.124678

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 5(39) (2018): Macroeconomics

Section

Development of Productive Forces and Regional Economy: Original Research

License

Copyright (c) 2018 Dmytro Savchuk

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.