Improvement of the extruder body design in order to increase reliability and quality of extrusion

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2021.237539

Keywords:

extruder, improvement of the extruder body, finning of the plates, extrusion quality, wear of the extruder body, extruder worm

Abstract

The article highlights one of the ways to improve the design of the extruder body in order to increase the reliability and, at the same time, the quality of extrusion. The object of research is a single-worm extruder. One of the most problematic areas of the extruder is the body. The main disadvantage of the extruder is the wear of the body surfaces due to corrosion or abrasion and requires regular replacement. This is due to the abrasive properties of the polymers and, accordingly, due to the friction of the polymer material against the body and the worm, especially due to contamination in the recycled material. In various sources, the replacement of the extruder worm with a more advanced design is widely covered. And scientists do not pay enough attention to improving the body of the extruder, which indicates the relevance of this study. That is why the problem of increasing the reliability of the extruder body is completely unsolved and urgent. In the course of the study, we used an analysis of the structural features of the extruder body, a literature-patent review of existing methods for improving the body of a single-worm extruder to increase the reliability and, at the same time, the quality of extrusion. As a result of the literature and patent review, the option of improving the extruder body based on the prototype of the split body, which additionally contains an inner surface of steel ribbed plates, was selected. It was found that the ribbing of the plates on the inner surface of the body increases the wear resistance of the body and promotes more intensive advancement of the polymer used material to the extruder head. This is due to the fact that the proposed improved body of the extruder has a number of features: steel ribbed plates rigidly fixed inside it are installed with overlap of the parting line of the extruder body. This makes it possible to increase the wear resistance and, accordingly, the reliability of the extruder body and, additionally, the extrusion quality. Compared with the known one-piece structures of the extruder body, the design of the body is detachable with steel rigidly mounted ribbed plates on the inner surface, which will simplify maintenance during repairs and, at the same time, improve the quality of extrusion.

Author Biography

Iryna Kazak, National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Chemical, Polymer and Silicate Mechanical Engineering

References

  1. Odnoshnekoviy ekstruder (odnochervyachniy ekstruder). Slovar terminov. PlastEkspert – vse o plastikakh i polimerakh. Available at: https://e-plastic.ru/slovar/o/odnoshnekovyi_extruder/
  2. Kushnir, V. G., Gavrilov, N. V., Shkotova, T. V., Borzenkov, A. P. (2019). The extruder improvement. Journal of VNIIMZH, 3 (35), 56–60.
  3. Sivetskyi, V. I., Kurylenko, V. M., Ivitskyi, I. I. (2018). Tekhnolohichne obladnannia vyrobnytstva budivelnykh ta polimernykh vyrobiv – 1. Obladnannia budivelnykh materialiv i vyrobiv. Laboratornyi praktykum z navchalnoi dystsypliny. Kyiv: KPI im. Ihoria Sikorskoho, 45. Available at: https://ela.kpi.ua/handle/123456789/25137
  4. Kostin, V. V., Pogorelskaya, O. I., Simonenko, V. I. (2011). Pat. No. RU 103446 U1. Korpus ekstrudera. MPK: A23 N17/00 (2006.01). No. 2010140649/13; declareted: 10.04.2010. published: 20.04.2011, Bul. No. 11.
  5. Kuzmina, V. O., Mikulonok, I. O., Shved, D. M., Shved, M. P. (2010). Pat. No. 54940 UA. Odnochervnyi ekstruder. MPK: B29 C47/36, B29 B7/34 (2009). No. u201007330; declareted: 14.06.2010; published: 25.11.2010, Bul. No. 22.
  6. Mikulonok, I. O., Sokolskyi, O. L., Sivetskyi, V. I., Radchenko, L. B. (2015). Osnovy proektuvannia odnocherviachnykh ekstruderiv. Kyiv: NTUU «KPI», 2015, 200.
  7. Makdonald, D., Mortazavi, A., Kreyg, D., Ilmonen, R., Gau, D. (2009). Pat. No. RU 2350467 C2. Usovershenstvovanniy ekstruder v sbore. MPK B29C 47/38 (2006.01). No. 2007117929/12; declareted:14.09.2007; published: 27.03.2009, Bul. No. 9.
  8. Feykhtinger, K., Khakl, M. (2016). Pat. No. RU 2577383 C2. Ustroystvo dlya pererabotki polimernogo materiala. MPK: B29B17/04. No. 2014119281/05; declareted: 12.10.2012; published: 20.03.2016, Bul. No. 8.
  9. Sheikh, A. K., Younas, M., Arif, A. F. M., Gasem, Z. (2011). Reliability and performance evaluation of extrusion dies. International Journal of Reliability and Safety, 5 (1), 21. doi: http://doi.org/10.1504/ijrs.2011.037345
  10. Ekstruziia. Available at: https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Екструзія
  11. Goff, J., Whelan, T.; DeLaney, D. (Ed.) (2000). The Dynisco Extrusion Processors. DYNISCO. Available at: https://www.dynisco.com/userfiles/files/27429_Legacy_Txt.pdf
  12. Ekstruziya termoplastov (2012). Available at: http://plastichelper.ru/biblioteka-on-line-about-polimers/52-technology-of-polimers/239-422-ekstruziya-termoplastov

Downloads

Published

2021-07-27

How to Cite

Kazak, I. . . (2021). Improvement of the extruder body design in order to increase reliability and quality of extrusion. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 4(1(60), 15–19. https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2021.237539

Issue

Section

Mechanical Engineering Technology: Reports on Research Projects