Potential GDP and its factors assessment

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2021.245593

Keywords:

potential GDP, production function, labor productivity, capital productivity, total factor productivity

Abstract

The object of the study is the reserves of economic growth in the country on the example of Ukraine. One of the problems of such studies is the calculation of potential GDP, which is not observed, but is calculated on the basis of various methods. Also problematic is the choice of method/methods of calculating potential GDP and potential values of its factors. Any estimate of the potential value of a variable is based on one or more statistical relationships and therefore contains an element of uncertainty. In order to reduce uncertainty, 2 methods were used to determine the potential values of the components of GDP – the growth rate of employment, fixed capital and TFP (total factor productivity).

The study used the methods of one-dimensional statistical filters Hodrick-Prescott and Baxter-King to estimate the potential values of GDP and the model of the production function to calculate potential GDP based on the potential values of its factors. The main reasons for the slowdown in Ukraine's GDP have been identified, the main of which is low capital productivity due to budget constraints. The second place in this ranking was taken by labor productivity, the last third – by TFP. Weak productivity and investment growth reinforced each other. Capital has the highest growth potential in Ukraine. Therefore, measures to stimulate capital investment, including in research and innovation and human capital, are important. Other factors that affect GDP through labor productivity and TFP are population aging, emigration, and tight lending conditions. To neutralize these factors, it is necessary to create new jobs, facilitate the conditions for obtaining loans by enterprises, stimulate advanced training and lifelong learning. The proposed approach to the separate calculation of potential values of GDP factors and their analysis find reserves for GDP growth. This provides the advantages of this method over other approaches.

Author Biography

Tetiana Kvasha, The State Organization «Institute of the Economy and Forecasting of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine»

Researcher

References

  1. De Masi, P. (1997). IMF Estimates of Potential Output: Theory and Practice. IMF Working Papers, 97 (177), 1–14. doi: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451974980.001
  2. Saxena, S. C., Cerra, V. (2000). Alternative Methods of Estimating Potential Output and the Output Gap: An Application to Sweden. IMF Working Papers, 00 (59), 1–33. doi: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451847932.001
  3. Demidenko, M., Kuznetsov, A. (2011). Otsenka ravnovesnogo fakticheskogo VVP: fil'tr Khodrika-Preskotta. Bankaŭski vesnik, 1 (510), 19–26. Available at: https://www.nbrb.by/bv/articles/8257.pdf
  4. Jahan, S., Mahmud, A. S. (n.d.). The Output Gap: Veering from Potential. International Monetary Fund (IMF). Available at: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/basics/22_output-gap.htm
  5. Bouthevillain, C., Cour-Thimann, P., Van Den Dool, G., De Cos, P. H., Langenus, G., Mohr, M., Momigliano, S., Tujula, M. (2001). Cyclically adjusted budget balances: an alternative approach. European Central Bank. Working Paper No. 77. Available at: https://www.ecb.europa.eu//pub/pdf/scpwps/ecbwp077.pdf
  6. Asmundson, I., Oner, C. (n.d.). Money: At the Center of Transactions. International Monetary Fund (IMF). Available at: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/basics/26-money.htm
  7. Champagne, J., Poulin-Bellisle, G., Sekkel, R. (2016). The Real-Time Properties of the Bank of Canada’s Staff Output Gap Estimates. Bank of Canada Staff Working Paper 2016-28. Available at: https://www.bankofcanada.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/swp2016-28.pdf
  8. Kamada, K. (2005). Real-time estimation of the output gap in Japan and its usefulness for inflation forecasting and policymaking. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 16 (3), 309–332. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2005.05.004
  9. Dieppe, A. (Ed.) (2020). Global productivity. Trends, Drivers, and Policies. The World Bank Group, 463. Available at: https://www.worldbank.org/en/research/publication/global-productivity
  10. Kim, H.-W., Qureshi, Z. (Eds.). (2020). Growth in a Time of Change: Global and Country Perspectives on a New Agenda. Brookings Institution Press, 374.
  11. Kilic Celik, S., Kose, M. A., Ohnsorge, F. (2020). Subdued Potential Growth: Sources and Remedies. Policy Research Working Paper. No. 9177. Available at: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/33426?locale-attribute=es
  12. Karpowicz, I., Suphaphiphat, N. (2020). Productivity Growth and Value Chains in Four European Countries. IMF Working Papers, 20 (18). doi: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513527918.001
  13. Cerra, V., Lama, R., Hakamada, M. (2021). Financial Crises, Investment Slumps, and Slow Recoveries. IMF Working Papers, 2021 (170), 1–30. doi: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781484325278.001
  14. Adler, G., Duval, R., Furceri, D., Kiliç Çelik, S., Koloskova, K., Poplawski-Ribeiro, M. (2017). Gone with the Headwinds: Global Productivity. Staff Discussion Notes, 17 (04), 1–98. doi: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781475589672.006
  15. Plan priorytetnykh dii Uriadu na 2021 rik: Rozporiadzhennia KMU vid 24 bereznia 2021 r. No. 276-r. Available at: https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.kmu.gov.ua%2Fstorage%2Fapp%2Fuploads%2Fpublic%2F606%2Fc9f%2F2be%2F606c9f2be56d1025204381.doc&wdOrigin=BROWSELINK
  16. Shumska, S. (2017). Growth prospects of Ukrainian economy against the background of global trends. Ekonomìka ì prognozuvannâ, 2017 (3), 7–30. doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/eip2017.03.007
  17. Grui, A., Vdovychenko, A. (2019). Quarterly Projection Model for Ukraine. NBU Working Papers, 3/2019. Kyiv: National Bank of Ukraine. Available at: https://bank.gov.ua/admin_uploads/article/WP_2019_03_Grui_Vdovychenko.pdf
  18. Kvasha, T. (2021). Modeling potential GDP for Ukraine fiscal space calculation. Ekonomika ta derzhava, 11, 120–125. doi: https://doi.org/10.32702/2306-6806.2021.11.120
  19. Skrypnychenko, M., Yatsenko, H. (2018). An instrumental analysis of GDP gap in Ukraine. Ekonomìka ì prognozuvannâ, 2018 (1), 58–78. doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/eip2018.01.058
  20. Crafts, N. (2019). The Fall in Potential Output due to the Financial Crisis: A Much Bigger Estimate for the UK. Comparative Economic Studies, 61 (4), 625–635. doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41294-019-00094-z
  21. Denis, С., Mc. Morrow, K., Werner, R. (2002). Production function approach to calculating potential growth and output gaps – estimates for the EU Member States and the US. European Commission Economic Paper, 176, 1–83. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/pages/publication1706_en.pdf
  22. Alvarez, L. J., Gomez-Loscos, A. (2017). A Menu on Output Gap Estimation Methods. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2973768
  23. Ladiray, D., Mazzi, G. L., Sartori, F. (2003). Statistical Methods for Potential Output Estimation and Cycle Extraction. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 68.
  24. Statistical Publication «National Accounts of Ukraine». (2019). National Accounts. Available at: http://ukrstat.gov.ua/druk/publicat/kat_u/publ3_u.htm
  25. Robocha syla Ukrainy 2020: Statystychnyi zbirnyk. (2021). Kyiv: Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrainy. Available at: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/druk/publicat/kat_u/2021/zb/07/zb_r_s_2020.pdf
  26. External Sector Statistics. Data. National Bank of Ukraine. Available at: https://bank.gov.ua/en/statistic/sector-external/data-sector-external

Downloads

Published

2021-12-23

How to Cite

Kvasha, T. (2021). Potential GDP and its factors assessment. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 6(4(62), 40–45. https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2021.245593

Issue

Section

Problems of Macroeconomics and Socio-Economic Development: Reports on Research Projects