Process and activities of the «unit of activity» - two forms of the organized whole

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2014.28079

Keywords:

system, whole, activity, integrity, category, concept, mechanism, motion, management, correspondence

Abstract

The problem of studying the form of relations among the categories of “process” and activities of the “unit of activity” was considered. To comprehend the form of these relationships, it was proposed to consider the contents of these categories using the general methodological (philosophical) categories, introduced by B. Spinoza and G. Hegel in their logical methods.

Based on this approach, the contents of the categories of “process” and activities of the “unit of activity” as physical and organized (having purposeful behavior) wholes, as well as the principle of the relationship among the parts of the specified wholes - the principle of the dialectical unity of the “common” and “single” were identified. Also, the contents of the implementation mechanisms of these relations, namely the motion implementation mechanism for the category of “process” and the “correspondence” realization mechanism for the category of the “unit of activity” were investigated.

Based on this approach, the principle of the relationship among the process implementation results and activities of the “unit of activity” - the principle of dialectical unity – “single” and “general” was also disclosed.

To study the activities of targeted systems, the content of their performance indicators is important. It was proposed to include the following parameters - strategy, goals, objectives and result indicators for a specified time (or time period) in the category of “future result project” for the activities of the “unit of activity”. This ensures the unambiguity of their definition, and therefore implementation.

The research results are of interest to specialists in the field of systems theory and systems analysis. Disclosure of the contents of the categories of “process” and activities of the “unit of activity” as wholes, consisting of parts, and motion and correspondence ensuring mechanisms allows to use functional systems theory results for the activity model development in the general enterprise theory.

Author Biography

Сергей Ильич Доценко, Kharkiv Petro Vasylenko National Technical University of Agriculture

Ph.D., Associate Professor Department of power and energy management

References

  1. Dotsenko, S. (2014). On the issue of system methodology crisis and ways to overcome it. Technology Audit And Production Reserves, 4(1(18)), 12-17. DOI:10.15587/2312-8372.2014.26230.

  2. Mesarovich, M., Takahara, Ya.; Translation from English Nappel'baum, Ye. L.; In: Emel'ianov, S. V. (1978). Obschaia teoriia sistem matematicheskie osnovy. M.: Mir, 311.

  3. Gegel', G. V. F. (1997). Nauka logiki. Pervaia chast' Obiektivnaia logika. Vtoraia chast' Subiektivnaia logika. Sankt-Peterburg: Nauka, 800.

  4. Bir, S. (1965). Kibernetika i upravlenie proizvodstvom. M.: Nauka, 392.

  5. Anohin, P. K. (1975). Printsipial'nye voprosy obschey teorii funktsional'nyh sistem. Ocherki po fiziologii funktsional'nyh sistem. M.: Meditsina, 448.

  6. Sudakov, K. V. (1997). Sistemokvanty fiziologicheskih protsessov. M.: Mezhdunarodnyy gumanitarnyy fond armenovedeniia im. akademika Ts. P. Agaiana, 152.

  7. Chechkin, A. V., Pirogov, M. V. (2009). Intellektualizatsiia slozhnoy sistemy kak sredstvo obespecheniia eio informatsionno-sistemnoy bezopasnosti. Fundamental'naia i prikladnaia matematika. Tsentr novyh informatsionnyh tehnologiy MGU, Izdatel'skiy dom «Otkrytye sistemy». Tom 15, №3, 225-239.

  8. Akoff, R. L., Iemeri, F. I.; Translation from English Rubal'skiy, G. B.; In: Ushakov, I. A. (1974). O tseleustremlennyh sistemah. M.: Sovetskoe radio, 272.

  9. Dotsenko, S. I. (2011). Metodolohiia dekompozytsii zmistu orhanizatsiinykh zadach enerhetychnoi diialnosti pidpryiemstv. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho tekhnichnoho universytetu silskoho hospodarstva imeni Petra Vasylenka, Vyp. 117, T. 2, 3-5.

  10. Dotsenko, S. I., Kukharenko, O. S., Levchenko, A. O. (2011). Obgruntuvannia skladu ta zmistu protsesnykh faktoriv orhanizatsiinoi diialnosti systemy enerhetychnoho menedzhmentu pidpryiemstv. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho tekhnichnoho universytetu silskoho hospodarstva imeni Petra Vasylenka, Vyp. 117, T. 2, 9-10.

Published

2014-10-02

How to Cite

Доценко, С. И. (2014). Process and activities of the «unit of activity» - two forms of the organized whole. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 5(1(19), 9–12. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2014.28079

Issue

Section

Technology audit