The graph theoretic formulation of the team formation problem based on the factor of competition

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2024.310570

Keywords:

teamwork, pareto set, multi-criteria objective functions, graph, multi-criteria optimization, competition

Abstract

The object of the research is to increase the level of productivity of teamwork due to the effective selection of participants who demonstrate the highest level of productivity in cooperation. The presented research is aimed at the mathematical formalization of the problem of team formation based on the results of a series of competitions using graph-theoretic approaches. Each competition in this series involves teams with the same number of participants. The composition of the team necessarily changes for each subsequent competition. After the competitive series, the obtained information about the teams' composition and their results is evaluated for the success of the interaction of the participants, which can be used in the formation of successful teams. A graph-theoretic formalization of the team formation problem on a complete undirected weighted graph has been developed. The set of vertices of this graph corresponds to the set of potential participants. Each edge is weighted with a number that reflects the quality of the interaction between the two participants. A valid solution is to cover the graph with cliques, the size of which is determined by the number of team members. A mathematical model of a two-criterion problem with MAXSUM and MAXMIN criteria was built, where the first criterion evaluates the overall success of the created teams, the second criterion evaluates the «weakest link», allowing to choose the option that maximizes the minimum edge weights for each clique. A two-criterion objective function defines a Pareto set consisting of all Pareto optima in the set of admissible solutions. The algorithmic problem of finding the complete set of alternatives, which is a subset of the Pareto set of minimum power when the condition of equality of the objective functions for the complete set of alternatives and the Pareto set is fulfilled, is considered. The weight of the edges of the graph is calculated using the scores obtained during the series of competitions. In practice, the research results can be used as a basis for the development of team building techniques.

Author Biographies

Anton Riabenko, National University «Zaporizhzhia Polytechnic»

PhD

Department of System Analysis and Computational Mathematics

Elina Tereschenko, National University «Zaporizhzhia Polytechnic»

PhD

Department of System Analysis and Computational Mathematics

Anna Bakurova, National University «Zaporizhzhia Polytechnic»

Doctor of Economic Sciences

Department of System Analysis and Computational Mathematics

Andrii Pyrozhok, National University «Zaporizhzhia Polytechnic»

PhD

Department of Electric Drive and Commercial Plant Automation

Olexiy Kuzkin, National University «Zaporizhzhia Polytechnic»

Doctor of Technical Sciences

Department of Transportation Technologies

References

  1. Kozlowski, S. W. J., Ilgen, D. R. (2006). Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7 (3), 77–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00030.x
  2. Acosta Mejía, C., Cambra Carrizo, G. I., Martinez-Carrasco, J., Cerda, M., Kang, M., Villalba, H., Yépez, C. (2024). Unveiling the IDB’s Project Executing Units: Performance Indicators, Results-Based Management, and Demand for Knowledge. Inter-American Development Bank. https://doi.org/10.18235/0013040
  3. Sa’diyah, K. (2024). Occupational Health and Safety, Training, and Teamwork for Hospital Medical Performance. Safety and Health for Medical Workers, 1 (1), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.69725/ehxp3d73
  4. Poth, A., Kottke, M., Riel, A.; Yilmaz, M., Clarke, P., Messnarz, R., Reiner, M. (Eds.) (2021). Orchestrating Agile IT Quality Management for Complex Solution Development Through Topic-Specific Partnerships in Large Enterprises – An Example on the EFIS Framework. Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement. EuroSPI 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science. Vol. 1442. Cham: Springer, 88–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85521-5_7
  5. Pasupa, T., Suzuki, S. (2022). Two-Stage Adaptive Large Neighbourhood Search for Team Formation and Worker Assignment Problems in Cellular Manufacturing Systems. Applied Sciences, 12 (16), 8323. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12168323
  6. Yang, W. Z. (2024). Teamwork triumphs: fostering student development through cooperative learning in university physical education. International Journal of Current Educational Practice, 12 (2), 114–120. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10954880
  7. Hebles, M., Jara, M., Alvarez de E, C. Y. (2020). Teamwork competence and collaborative learning in entrepreneurship training. European J. of International Management, 20 (2), 238–255. https://doi.org/10.1504/ejim.2020.10022225
  8. Sangadji, H. (2023). The Influence of Emotional Intelligence, Teamwork, And Organizational Citizenship Behavior on Performance Agricultural Extension Workers in Banten Province. IJHCM (International Journal of Human Capital Management), 7 (1), 141–157. https://doi.org/10.21009/ijhcm.07.01.11
  9. Feitosa, J., Grossman, R., Kramer, W. S., Salas, E. (2020). Measuring team trust: A critical and meta‐analytical review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 41 (5), 479–501. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2436
  10. Delfgaauw, J., Dur, R., Onemu, O., Sol, J. (2022). Team Incentives, Social Cohesion, and Performance: A Natural Field Experiment. Management Science, 68 (1), 230–256. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3901
  11. Makanda, I. L. D., Jiang, P., Yang, M., Shi, H. (2023). Emergence of collective intelligence in industrial cyber-physical-social systems for collaborative task allocation and defect detection. Computers in Industry, 152, 104006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2023.104006
  12. Ai, W., Chen, Y., Mei, Q., Ye, J., Zhang, L. (2023). Putting Teams into the Gig Economy: A Field Experiment at a Ride-Sharing Platform. Management Science, 69 (9), 5336–5353. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4624
  13. Ertac, S., Gümren, M., Koçkesen, L. (2019). Strategic feedback in teams: Theory and experimental evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 162, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2019.04.005
  14. Fischer, M., Rilke, R. M., Yurtoglu, B. B. (2023). When, and why, do teams benefit from self-selection? Experimental Economics, 26 (4), 749–774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-023-09800-2
  15. Zhao, M., Eadeh, F. R., Nguyen, T.-N., Gupta, P., Admoni, H., Gonzalez, C., Woolley, A. W. (2023). Teaching agents to understand teamwork: Evaluating and predicting collective intelligence as a latent variable via Hidden Markov Models. Computers in Human Behavior, 139, 107524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107524
  16. Mansour, T. (2012). Combinatorics of Set Partitions. Chapman and Hall/CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/b12691
  17. Perepelitsa, V. A., Tereschenko, E. V. (2018). On Complete and Quasi-Complete Two-Criteria Optimization Problems on Graphs. Cybernetics and Systems Analysis, 54 (3), 385–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10559-018-0040-1
  18. Ohirko, O. I., Halayko, N. V. (2017). Teoriya ymovirnostey ta matematychna statystyka. Lviv: LʹvDUVS, 292.
The graph theoretic formulation of the team formation problem based on the factor of competition

Downloads

Published

2024-08-30

How to Cite

Riabenko, A., Tereschenko, E., Bakurova, A., Pyrozhok, A., & Kuzkin, O. (2024). The graph theoretic formulation of the team formation problem based on the factor of competition. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 4(4(78), 25–30. https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2024.310570