Innovation cycles as a strategic methodological objectivity of the new technological paradigm of socio-economic development

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2025.331232

Keywords:

innovation cycles, technological paradigm, industrial revolution, strategic management, socio-economic transformation

Abstract

The object of research is the processes of socio-economic development in the context of technological transformation, taking into account innovation cycles. The paper examines the role of innovation cycles as a strategic methodological objectivity that determines the dynamics of socio-economic development in the context of the transition to a new technological paradigm. The relevance of the topic is due to the global challenges of our time: digitalization, digitalization of the economy, development of artificial intelligence, transition to a green economy and the need to formulate adaptive development strategies that can respond to the pace of technological change. Innovation cycles are viewed as a multi-stage process that includes emergent ideas, new technologies, mass adoption of innovations and their impact on the structure of production, employment and institutional models.

On the basis of historical and theoretical analysis, the paper traces the evolution of industrial revolutions from Industry 1.0 to the anticipated Industry 6.0. It is noted that each new phase of industrial development is accompanied by the formation of a new technological paradigm that changes the principles of interaction between technology, capital, labor and knowledge. Industry 6.0, as the expected next stage, is associated with the symbiosis of artificial and biological intelligence, autonomous economies, decentralized management structures and value-oriented innovation development.

The author substantiates the need to understand innovation cycles not only as an empirical phenomenon, but also as a methodological basis for strategic planning. In this context, the paper proposes a conceptual model that provides for the integration of cyclical analysis into the processes of state regulation, forecasting and formation of sustainable growth policies. The conclusions presented are of interdisciplinary importance and can serve as a basis for further research in the fields of economics, sociology, public administration and technological development.

Author Biographies

Viktoriia Prokhorova, Educational and Research institute Ukrainian Engineering Pedagogics Academy V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor

Department of Economics and Management

Svitlana Mushnykova, Educational and Research Institute Dnipro Metallurgical Institute of the Ukrainian State University of Science and Technology

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor

Department of Financial Management, Accounting Analytics and Business Monitoring

Iryna Abernikhina, Educational and Research Institute Dnipro Metallurgical Institute of the Ukrainian State University of Science and Technology

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Financial Management, Accounting Analytics and Business Monitoring

Yaryna Yukhman, National University "Lviv Polytechnic"

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Enterprise and Investment Economics

Institute of Economics and Management

Olena Makovoz, Educational and Research institute Ukrainian Engineering Pedagogics Academy V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Economics and Management

Krystyna Slastianykova, Educational and Research institute Ukrainian Engineering Pedagogics Academy V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

Assistant

Department of Economics and Management

References

  1. Dmytrenko, H. V. (2009). Innovatsiinyi rozvytok suspilstva v konteksti tsyklichnoho rozvytku produktyvnykh syl. Politychnyi menedzhment, 2, 136–145. Available at: https://ipiend.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/dmytrenko_innovatsiinyi.pdf
  2. Petrenko, L. A. (2010). Life Cycles of Innovations. Ekonomika ta derzhava, 3, 94–96.
  3. Semenoh, O. M., Kravets, L. V., Stativka, V. I. (2022). Tekst u doslidnytskykh paradyhmakh: teoriia i praktyka. Sumy: SumDPU im. A. S. Makarenka, 248.
  4. Makarchuk, O. V. (2011). Refleksyvnyi potentsial osvitnoi paradyhmy. Visnyk NTUU “KPI”. Filosofiia. Psykholohiia. Pedahohika, 2, 77–80. Available at: https://ela.kpi.ua/bitstream/123456789/4393/1/15-filos-Makarchuk.pdf
  5. Kniazevych, A. O. (2010). Innovatsiinyi lah i yoho rol v innovatsiinomu protsesi. Aktualni problemy ekonomiky, 6, 26–30.
  6. Derevianko, Yu. M., Kontseva, D. S. (2010). Innovatsiini lahy v ekonomitsi. CORE. Available at: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/18593531.pdf
  7. Oriekhova, K. V., Ripka, L. M. (2010). Doslidzhennia klasyfikatsii innovatsii. Naukovi pratsi NAN Ukrainy, 3, 103–107.
  8. Iazliuk, B., Butonov, A., Kostetskyi, V. (2012). Theoretical basis of the essence of innovations and innovative activity. Visnyk TNTU, 6, 49–53. Available at: https://elartu.tntu.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/2278/1/GEB_2012_v39_No6-B_Yazlyuk_A_Butonov_V_Kosteckij-Theoretical_basis_of_the_nature__52.pdf
  9. Prokhorova, V., Mushnykova, S., Kovalenko, D., Koleshchuk, O., Babichev, A. (2023). Convergence of educational technologies as an imperative for the development of innovation cooperation in the context of circular transformation. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4 (13 (124)), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.286183
  10. Prokhorova, V., Abernikhina, I., Mushnykova, S., Bozhanova, O., Toporkova, O. (2024). Risk management based on hedging tools in an export-oriented economy. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2 (13 (128)), 26–34. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2024.299651
  11. Ralko, O. S. (2017). Waves of innovations: theoretical and practical aspects. Naukovyi visnyk Mizhnarodnoho humanitarnoho universytetu. Seriia: Ekonomika i menedzhment, 25 (1), 40–42.
  12. Dutta, S., Lanvin, B., Rivera León, L., Wunsch-Vincent, S. (Eds.) (2024). Global Innovation Index 2024: Unlocking the promise of social entrepreneurship. World Intellectual Property Organization, 326. https://doi.org/10.34667/tind.50062
  13. Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrainy. Available at: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua
  14. Pro priorytetni napriamy innovatsiinoi diialnosti v Ukraini (2011). Zakon Ukrainy No. 3715-VI. 08.09.2011. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3715-17#Text
  15. Stratehiia rozvytku sfery innovatsiinoi diialnosti na period do 2030 roku (2019). Rozporiadzhennia KMU No. 526-r. 10.06.2019. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/526-2019-%D1%80#n12
Innovation cycles as a strategic methodological objectivity of the new technological paradigm of socio-economic development

Downloads

Published

2025-06-02

How to Cite

Prokhorova, V., Mushnykova, S., Abernikhina, I., Yukhman, Y., Makovoz, O., & Slastianykova, K. (2025). Innovation cycles as a strategic methodological objectivity of the new technological paradigm of socio-economic development. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 3(4(83), 100–105. https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2025.331232

Issue

Section

Problems of Macroeconomics and Socio-Economic Development