Justification the choice of import substitution strategy direction on maching building enterprises

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2015.38554

Keywords:

product group, mechanism of strategy management, BCG matrix, method Saaty, Sharpe coefficient, Beta coefficient

Abstract

Mechanical engineering is a very important sector for Ukraine budget formation. But in recent years the national producers lose the volume of internal market. It is connected with the low competitiveness of enterprises. The negative influence of outside factors, outdated manufacturing equipment and inefficient management system determine the position of producers in the industry.

Therefore, the issue of import substitution becomes urgent with each year. In this article, the authors propose a scientific organization and economic scheme of a process control strategy of import substitution at the enterprise. Based on the efficiency analysis of company product policy the stages of analyzing of the suitability of implementing the strategy of import substitution are proposed. Economic analysis allows to determine the most advantageous direction of implementing the strategy of import substitution. In order to increase competitiveness in internal and foreign markets product policy and enterprise as a whole has to be effectively managed. The result of this article is a defined direction and product group for implementation of the import substitution strategy.

Author Biographies

Юлія Сергіївна Шипуліна, Sumy State University, Rimsky-Korsakov Str., 2, Sumy, Ukraine, 40030

Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor

Department of marketing and management of innovative activity

Тетяна Володимирівна Ващенко, Sumy State University, Rimsky-Korsakov Str., 2, Sumy, Ukraine, 40030

Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor

Department of marketing and management of innovative activity

References

  1. Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrainy. Available: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/
  2. Pro osnovy natsionalnoi bezpeky Ukrainy. (19.06.2003). Zakon Ukrainy № 964-IV. Available: http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/964-15
  3. Mazaraki, A., Melnyk, T. (2012). Import ta perspektyvy importozamishchennia v Ukraini. Visnyk KNTEU, 6, 5-15.
  4. Mel'nik, T. (2011). Regulirovanie importa v usloviiah ekonomicheskogo krizisa. Zhurnal evropeiskoi ekonomiki, 10 (3), 273–291.
  5. Yakubovskyi, M. M. (2011). Restrukturyzatsiia promyslovosti yak zasib podolannia importnoi zalezhnosti ekonomiky Ukrainy. Natsionalne hospodarstvo Ukrainy: teoriia ta praktyka upravlinnia, 100–112.
  6. Fedulova, L. (2009, January). Tendentsii rozvytku vysokotekhnolohichnoho sektoru ekonomiky Ukrainy. Ekonomist, 1, 34–41.
  7. Kindzerskyi, Yu. V., Yakubovskyi, M. M., Halytsia, I. O. et al.; In: Kindzerskyi, Yu. V.; Institute of Economics and Forecasting of NAS of Ukraine. (2009). Potentsial natsionalnoi promyslovosti: tsili ta mekhanizmy efektyvnoho rozvytku. К., 928.
  8. Enei, Ya. I.; In: Besedin, V. F., Muzychenk, A. S. (2013). Polityka importozamishchennia yak peredumova innovatsiinoho rozvytku ekonomiky Ukrainy. Innovatsiina skladova suchasnoi ekonomichnoi dynamiky. Uman: FOP Zhovtyi O.O., 362. Available: http://dspace.udpu.org.ua:8080/jspui/handle/6789/652
  9. Ahentstvo z rozvytku infrastruktury fondovoho rynku Ukrainy. Available: http://smida.gov.ua/
  10. Rybal'chenko, I. (09.08.1999). Prakticheskie metody razrabotki i analiza tovarnoi strategii predpriiatiia na osnove vnutrennei vtorichnoi informatsii. Available: http://www.cfin.ru/marketing/quasi_bcg.shtml
  11. Saati, T.; Translation from English: Vachnadze, R. G. (1993). Priniatie reshenii: Metod analiza ierarhii. M.: Radio i sviaz', 93.
  12. Vitkovskyi, O. (2006). Zastosuvannia portfelnykh teorii dlia otsinky efektyvnosti dyversyfikatsii diialnosti pidpryiemstva. Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo, 9, 166-168.
  13. Stat'i, knigi foreks, indikatory foreks, sovetniki foreks i soft dlia treiderov. Available: http://forexaw.com.
  14. Finansovyi portal Minfin. Znacheniia uchetnoi stavki NBU v Ukraine s 2001 po 2015 gody. Available: http://index.minfin.com.ua/

Downloads

Published

2015-01-29

How to Cite

Шипуліна, Ю. С., & Ващенко, Т. В. (2015). Justification the choice of import substitution strategy direction on maching building enterprises. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 1(6(21), 37–42. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2015.38554

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 6(21) (2015): Economics and management of enterprise (by the type of economic activity)

Section

Economics and management of enterprise (by the type of economic activity)

License

Copyright (c) 2016 Юлія Сергіївна Шипуліна, Тетяна Володимирівна Ващенко

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.