Social security research in a context of welfare state priorities: foreign approaches

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2016.72722

Keywords:

social security, social policy, social protection, Copenhagen School, Paris School

Abstract

The issues of social security at the level of individual nation-states and the world community in general were highlighted especially in the beginning of XXI century under the influence of political, economic and military challenges and threats. The article deals with the problem of social security as a welfare state priority in a global world. Author of the article discussed different approaches of social security phenomenon in theoretical aspects. Author of the article try to understand differences between Copenhagen and Paris school approaches on social security problem with connection of indicators of social expenditures and Social Progress Index (SPI). The result of research is the found positive relationship between social expenditures and social progress in different countries. Social security system is more developed in countries with high level of social expenditures and stimulates social progress. The results of research can be useful in discourse of social security progress in a context of social policy and social progress on national and global levels. 

Author Biography

Тетяна Ігорівна Длугопольська, Ternopil National Economic University, Lvivska 11, Ternopil, 46020

Teacher, Ph.D. Student

Department of Financial-Economical Security and Intellectual Property

References

  1. Waever, O., Buzan, B., Kelstrup, M., Lemaitre, P. (1993). Identity, Migration and the New Security Agenda in Europe. New York: St. Martin’s Press. 221.
  2. Buzan, B., Waever, O., Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A New Framework for Analysis. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers. 239.
  3. Buzan, B. (2007). Will the Global War on Terrorism be the New Cold War? International Affairs, 82 (6), 1101–1118. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2006.00590.x
  4. Bigo, D., Walker, R. (2002). Editorial Introduction. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 27 (1), 1–3. doi:10.1177/03043754020270s101
  5. Huysmans, J. (1998). Revisiting Copenhagen. European Journal of International Relations, 4 (4), 479–504. doi:10.1177/1354066198004004004
  6. Balzacq, T. (2005). The Three Faces of Securitization: Political Agency, Audience and Context. European Journal of International Relations, 11 (2), 171–201. doi:10.1177/1354066105052960
  7. Lipschutz, R. D. (1995). On Security. New York: Columbia UP, 233.
  8. Skurativskyi, V., Lyndiuk, O. (2011). Sotsialna bezpeka ukrainskoho suspilstva ta shliakhy yii zabezpechennia. Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii derzhavnoho upravlinnia pry Prezydentovi Ukrainy, 3, 194–204.
  9. In: Horbulin, V. P., Vlasiuk, O. S., Libanova, E. M., Liashenko, O. M. (2015). Donbas i Krym: tsina povernennia. Kyiv: NISD, 474.
  10. Sirota, I. M. (2004). Pravo sotsial'nogo obespecheniia v Ukraine. Kharkiv: Odissei, 384.
  11. McDonald, M. (2008). Securitization and the Construction of Security. European Journal of International Relations, 14 (4), 563–587. doi:10.1177/1354066108097553.
  12. Smith, H. (2000). Bad, Mad, Sad or Rational Actor? Why the Securitization Paradigm Makes for Poor Policy Analysis in North Korea. International Affairs, 76 (3), 593–617. doi: 10.1111/1468-2346.00154
  13. Abrahamsen, R. (2005). Blair’s Africa: The Politics of Securitization and Fear. Alternatives, 30 (1), 55–80.
  14. Emmers, R. (2004). ASEAN and the Securitization of Transnational Crime in Southeast Asia. The Pacific Review, 16 (3), 419–438. doi:10.1080/0951274032000085653
  15. Elbe, S. (2006). Should HIV/AIDS be Securitized? The Ethical Dilemmas of Linking HIV/AIDS and Security. International Studies Quarterly, 50 (1), 119–144. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2006.00395.x
  16. Roe, P. (2004). Securitization and Minority Rights: Conditions of Desecuritization. Security Dialogue, 35 (3), 279–294. doi:10.1177/0967010604047527
  17. Burke, A., Lee-Koo, K., McDonald, M. (2016). An Ethics of Global Security. Journal of Global Security Studies, 1 (1), 1–16. doi:10.1093/jogss/ogv004
  18. MLibrary. Digital Collections. Available: http://quod.lib.umich.edu/
  19. Social Expenditure Database (SOCX). Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Available: http://www.oecd.org/social/expenditure.htm
  20. Social Progress Index. Available: http://www.socialprogressimperative.org/global-index

Published

2016-05-26

How to Cite

Длугопольська, Т. І. (2016). Social security research in a context of welfare state priorities: foreign approaches. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 3(5(29), 48–53. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2016.72722